this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
658 points (99.1% liked)

News

23357 readers
4189 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A former Internal Revenue Service contractor, who leaked tax information about Donald Trump and other wealthy individuals to news organizations, got his job to intentionally to spread the confidential records, according to Justice Department prosecutors.

Charles Edward Littlejohn, 38, of Washington, pleaded guilty in October to unauthorized disclosure of tax return and return information. U.S. District Judge Ana Reye scheduled sentencing for Jan. 29. Prosecutors recommended Tuesday he receive the maximum sentence of five years in prison.

“After applying to work as an IRS consultant with the intention of accessing and disclosing tax returns, Defendant weaponized his access to unmasked taxpayer data to further his own personal, political agenda, believing that he was above the law,” wrote prosecutors Corey Amundson, chief of the Justice Department’s public integrity section, Jennifer Clarke and Jonathan Jacobson.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 285 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like Charles Edward Littlejohn is a fucking badass and overall rad dude worth celebrating. Additionally, if he gets the maximum sentence of 5 years, that will be drastically longer than many of the January 6th rioters. I can't change the outcome for him, but I do wish him luck.

[–] CosmicTurtle 81 points 10 months ago (6 children)

He needs to be pardoned or at least have his sentence commuted. But I highly doubt that Biden would do it.

[–] RememberTheApollo 75 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A precedent where your followers break the law in your name can be a dangerous war of escalation between opponents.

[–] grue 90 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Trump already set that precedent when he pardoned Roger Stone.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

"your followers"

More like "those who hate the other guy"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gdog05 251 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't sound to me like he thought he was above the law. He seemed to know the consequences. He just didn't think that Trump should be above the law. Or, at the very least, above presidential decorum.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yet the orange buffoon still walks the streets and continues raising hatred.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoneymouse 142 points 10 months ago

American hero

[–] [email protected] 140 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He knew he wasn't above the law, he just believed the consequences were worth it. I hope he's right.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 10 months ago

Yup. Dude took one for the team.

[–] ChicoSuave 131 points 10 months ago

He held the records up to the light knowing he would be burned by it. Truly the definition of a hero.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 10 months ago

What a fucking hero.

[–] paddirn 62 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Absolute bullshit that this guy is getting the maximum sentence for releasing what Trump himself had said he was going to release years ago and what it's just taken for granted that Presidents will always release (it should be a requirement for the job). MEANWHILE, the list of crimes that Trump has committed makes this seem like a petty crime in comparison and Trump is still walking free. Trump has literally admitted to seeing himself as above the law.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

He's not guaranteed to get the maximum sentence. The prosecutor just asked for the maximum. He hasn't been sentenced yet.

[–] Snapz 56 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is probably one of the hardest things to do in the era we live in - go against our social engineering to sacrifice a relatively comfortable life in defiance of this moment.

Collectively, we're frogs in the pot, especially as we move towards the end of this year and the worldwide elections as an accelerator to societal collapse. It's so hard to know what to do that might make a difference today, at least this person tried, I hope society persists beyond this garbage moment and for long enough to allow history to look back on people like this as heros who at least tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeemsNormal 50 points 10 months ago

Littlejohn… friend of Robinhood?

[–] frickineh 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If he gets jail time, I'll contribute to his commissary account.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Silly as it sounds, this is exactly how to support him. That and writing letters. It means so much to incarcerated folks to have the few things from commissary that make life just a little less miserable, and what to spend it on is a bit of choice and independence in a system designed to take every bit of those things away as a means of grinding inmates down.

Letters are just as important - a lifeline to the outside. Sometimes literally. Guards know who is in regular contact with people outside, and who doesn't have anyone to report abuse to. Being able to communicate things like unmet medical needs so someone can set up a call campaign can be life or death.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lledrtx 36 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Why wasn't he protected as a whistleblower? Or why isn't Biden pardoning him?

[–] Maggoty 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A. Probably because he took the specifically to do this.

B. They don't usually pardon someone before sentencing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

There's often a limits to whistleblower protections, usually you're only protected if you report it internally, and publishing private information is often not protected at all, and whenever there's protections available for publishing it then it's usually only protected if it's limited to what's necessary to inform the public about a sufficiently severe issue (like newsworthy major fraud).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] june 35 points 10 months ago

I suspect he never believed he was above the law, but that the law was broken.

[–] Mediocre_Bard 34 points 10 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] alienanimals 33 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Everyone's taxes should be public information. There are too many rich assholes hiding the fact that they don't pay their fair share.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Fuck Scientology and fuck scientologists though. Especially Tom Cruise. Also fuck the people that pay to watch movies with Tom Cruise in them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 31 points 10 months ago

Prosecutors for the Department of Justice’s “public integrity” section are complete fucking twats. They’ve been 1000% blind to anything trump has done, oh but this guy? Yeah “five years in jail”!

Fuckers. I hope they fear the truth that their lives are being wasted to serve their pinheaded idiot masters.

And we’re not doing the “but it’s against the law” thing when it comes to dealing with trump. The convicted fraudster rapist who stage a coup to stay in power? Motherfucker we’re about to go Thomas Jefferson on that demented greasy fuck if he keeps threatening the Constitution and, well, everybody else. Because the pinheads at the Department of Justice’s “public integrity” unit are busy stuffing their heads up their butts. Time’s up, Merrick. You got shit done.

Hey while we got ya Merrick, you got that unredacted Mueller Report we paid 15 million for? No? Still deciding on that are ya? Fuckhead republiQan stooge.

[–] MisterSteve 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obviously, with a name like "Littlejohn," he's a good guy in league with Robin Hood and Friar Tuck and all the other Merry Men. In his defense, Trump did (repeatedly) promise to disclose his IRS tax returns to the public. The man only helped Trump keep a campaign promise. Littlejohn ought to get an award and an all-expense paid vacation at Mar-a-Lago!

[–] pigup 13 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Tax returns should be public anyways

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

I’d like to remind everyone that Little John is one of the people who fought alongside Robin Hood.

[–] Illuminostro 21 points 10 months ago

The hero we need.

[–] generalpotato 21 points 10 months ago

Littlejohn just pulled a big john in my pants move.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Talk about a real go getter attitude. He had his eye on the prize, followed through, and delivered!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

EDIT II: I am indeed apparently quoting the prosecutors. Whoopsie doodles. Prosecutors are generally ass people, too, of course. Leaving the original for my shame.


Defendant weaponized his access to unmasked taxpayer data to further his own personal, political agenda, believing that he was above the law

Literally no one who does something like this thinks they're above the law when they're just doing to force our elected officials to comply with the law.

Fucking judges man, they're just as shitty as fucking cops. Look at this fucking holier than thou bullshit attitude from this asswipe. The number of judges who equate the law with morality and ethics is too damn high. The number of judges who trust the cops word over anyone else's simply because they're a cop is too damn high.

I got read the riot act by a judge over weed once. I may as well have been dealing with a priest I got so much holier than thou how dangerous you are bullshit over fucking WEED.

AJAB.

EDIT: I mean, hell, you want a real disgusting example of this? Go look at the court history around the prosecution of Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers. Ellsberg got lucky, because he was absolutely treated similarly by the judge, as though he "thought he was above the law" and not that he was trying to correct an injustice. I guess judges only like it when they can "correct" an "injustice."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You quoted the prosecutors, not the judge...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Does he have a go fund me?

[–] Inucune 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He pleaded guilty, but I don't think a jury would have convicted him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague 12 points 10 months ago

He did good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

2nd to the guy who became the university of ohio mascot to beat up the ohio state mascot.

[–] btaf45 9 points 10 months ago

Thank you for your service to the public.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I can't believe the prosecutor is talking about nobody being above the law with a straight face.

load more comments
view more: next ›