this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1077 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

5308 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 221 points 8 months ago (29 children)

My husband and I own a house, but I'd give it up in a second for living in an apartment, if it meant housing for all

I'd wait in longer lines for healthcare, if it meant healthcare for all

I'd eat foods I don't much care for, if it meant food for all

I'd wait at a bus depot or train station, if it meant equitable transportation and saving the planet

It's hard for me to fathom that there are people who wouldn't do the same, who are willing to let others suffer for the tiniest bit of potential luxury

And before someone comes in with "lOoK wHaT a GoOd PeRsOn YoU aRe," I'm really not. It doesn't take a good person to not wish suffering on others.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 8 months ago (4 children)

the irony is that we wouldn’t need to sacrifice much (if at all) for those benefits – in other words, you could be completely selfish and still have a better life

  • US is sitting at 28 vacant homes per homeless person (city of Helsinki saved the country of Finland €15000 per person per year just by buying them a house)
  • healthcare for all (and better quality) would cost us about 2/3 what we’re paying now
  • we produce (and have) plenty of food for everyone but companies would rather throw it away if they can’t make a profit (John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath)
  • better public transit means more convenience for everyone with the added benefits of better air quality, nicer neighborhoods, less wear-and-tear on infrastructure, cheaper commuting – [email protected]
[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but companies would rather throw it away if they can’t make a profit

Not just companies, I feel obliged to point out. The rot goes much deeper - independent farmers did the same at the time. The sickness is in society itself.

Nowadays we just pay farmers not to farm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kallioapina 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

On the Finnish homelesness part: you're spouting misinfo, knowingly or unknowingly. Our system doesnt buy houses or apartments to anyone.

Every homeless person though IS offered a flat in a socially subsidized, very cheap price as part of a social program and/or place in a substance abuse coliving program-type of thing (not sure on the spesifics of those).

Its weird how there's so much misinformation about Finland in Lemmy these days, like were some magical egelitarian happy-land. No, we just pay our taxes and have built up a social security net, though thats actively being dismantled by our right wing government these days.

Source of all of this: I am a finn.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister 6 points 8 months ago

US is sitting at 28 vacant homes per homeless person

This pisses me off so much. There should be an extra tax for unfilled housing.

[–] Rookwood 5 points 8 months ago

Yes, everyone having a better quality of life would elevate everyone who isn't wealthy enough to isolate into a fenced off estate and has servants to do all their domestic tasks.

[–] Rookwood 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This means you're a good person but these trade-offs are false dichotomies. None of it is necessary to provide these services to all. We already have incredibly long wait times for healthcare in our ruthlessly for-profit system. The only thing that keeps those services from everyone is the greed of the extremely wealthy and the stupidity of those who fall for their lies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm well aware, but I'm saying even if it were true that we had to, it would be well worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I’d wait in longer lines for healthcare, if it meant healthcare for all

I don't blame you for it, but this is such a bullshit talking point, at least when it comes to U.S. for-profit healthcare. I had to wait over 6 months to see a neurologist after my old one moved to another city. I had to wait two months to get my gallbladder removed just to find out if it would solve a medical problem it didn't solve. I have to go to the Mayo clinic now. I made an appointment in December. I can get in at the end of March.

On top of that, some evaluations that would have helped my daughter a lot earlier took a year and a half from when we scheduled them and we had to drive to another city an hour and a half away by car.

That's pretty much on par with what I hear from people who live in Canada, if not worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

but this is such a bullshit talking point

Absolutely agree! As I said to a couple others, view my comment as more of a thought experiment, an "even if" type thing (which I should have probably prefaced it with). Even if the talking points were real, it would still be bullshit.

None of the things on my list necessitate sacrificing the other, except for maybe the use of public transportation.

I'm really sorry for what you went through. I went through something similar, and on top of everything else we're adding fuel to the fire by putting ourselves at the mercy of massive private insurance companies.

You're preaching to the choir!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Woah woah woah. That's coMmuNiSM

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Komrad, Do you think we can trick them by calling it Republic+?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The lines are still long with private insurance, you're not getting in for specialty procedures very quickly no matter what payment method you use. I say this as someone who does specialty neurodiagnostic procedures in the US. We don't care if you can pay or you have this insurance or that, there's a line everywhere and unless you're coming in through the ED, you have to wait in it.

[–] lennybird 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Keep in mind, too, that in a single-payer system, preventative care is more heavily emphasized. This shifts the load bearing of the system on the front-end (PCPs, NPs) and in theory problems are identified before they snowball into greater issues that require specialties.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thank you. This is also an important point.

My comment was more of a thought experiment, since none of the things I listed actually require sacrificing the other.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bye 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t do those things, but we shouldn’t have to. We don’t have to give up quality medical care for everyone to have it. Or give up houses for everyone to have a place to live. The resources for these things are held by the ultra wealthy, not by the middle class.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You're right about the healthcare thing, because we can just hire more medical professionals and give them better working conditions (including but not limited to pay).

Housing is different. Single family houses take up a lot of space. Space that necessarily reduces space available for other homes. You need to increase average housing density in order to be able to house everyone at a price that is affordable within a reasonable distance of opportunities for work and social activities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GladiusB 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The problem is the ones that need to care the most are the ones that care the least. The richest people in the world are in pissing contests about big ass clocks and space ships.

Do I think these are intellectually cool? Yes. Do I think it's more important than feeding every kid and giving them shelter and education? No.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, my comment was just a thought experiment since we don't actually need to trade any of these things for the other, and fortunately we can also feed every kid and give them education too (I've already addressed shelter).

Neoliberals be like: We have to decide. No, we don't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only thing I won't settle for is wage slavery. No one should be held hostage to a job that has stolen their sense of wonder.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm so lucky to have a job where I can help people and feel good, at a non-profit that isn't causing harm.

I know not everyone can have this, but we can make it so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's not that nobody deserves a yacht, it's that capitisim gives yachts to the wrong people. My middle school librarian deserves a yacht, my 9th grade science teacher deserves a yacht, Jefferson Bezoar does not deserve a yacht.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not that Bezes doesn't deserve a yacht. It's that he doesn't deserve 176.9 million of them. If all money in the US was distributed equally then everyone in the US could have a small yacht. But of course we can't be ignoring the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If money was distributed equally among adults in the US, everyone would make around $90k/year income. Not enough to afford a yacht. Not even enough to afford a house in some parts of the country. That's kind of mind blowing to me.

[–] CrowAirbrush 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If everyone would make $90k then the economy would be completely different.

I think Lamborghini would be making some budget version of their current supercars, that would never come to exist in a 90k world.

To just name a random item that popped in my head.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NounsAndWords 35 points 8 months ago

I think it's really "why should they get a thing for free that I've been working so hard for?" while they should be asking "why do I have to work so hard just to afford a decent place to live?"

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

"I AM A MILLIONAIRE, I AM A MILLIONAIRE, I AM-"

[smash cut to an apartment like mine that leaks when it rains too hard]

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

an old client always said:

"i'm working on my second million..."

....

"i gave up on the first one."

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

The original quote is "Temporarily embarrassed capitalists," which I think says a lot more about where we are.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Would love to own a yacht but only if I had enough money to pay people to do maintenance. Owning even a much smaller boat is fucking annoying.

[–] RGB3x3 21 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The real cost of a boat is like 90% maintenance costs. It's just a money pit, honestly.

The better use of obscene riches is to charter a yacht that has a full crew when you want to go out. Otherwise, you're just burning cash.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Two happiest days of a boat owner: when buying the boat and when selling it

[–] Smokeydope 7 points 8 months ago

Oh so this is why so many of my yuppie nenighbors have a rotting boat in their yard that hasn't been touched in decades. NGL though, hundredrabbits vlog of sailing across the ocean from canada to japan and back in a yamaha 33 is some really inspirational stuff and I love the idea of doing something adventurous like that once in my life even if its supremely dangerous.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (13 children)

Woah hold on there, it's not like the Bible (that they point to as the source of authority e.g. that is why what Israel does is "good") says "the worker deserves their wages", or "treat the immigrant and poor among you as your own", or "whatsoever you do to the least of these, it's like you are doing it directly to me", or even more foundational basics like "show kindness to people"... right?

The effects of brainwashing are quite strong. We need to find a way to get even stronger if we want to overcome.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›