this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
473 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To be fair, I don't think the gag order included attacking the judge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 166 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Why even issue a gag order that will obviously never be followed if there is no intent to follow through?

[–] farcaster 130 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They just gotta keep up the illusion of consequences for Trump. Fines (which will never be collected). Gag orders (which will never be enforced). Bans from business and finance dealings (which will be reversed). But hey we're doing something!

[–] [email protected] 89 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's infuriating. He gets treated with so much deference and kid gloves, and he's still acting like he's being persecuted. And the worst part is that his base eats it all up.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Someone should sprinkle some drugs on him. Worst case, he has to deal with Eric sniffing him for a day.

[–] NABDad 12 points 9 months ago

We have a rule against cruel and unusual punishment.

[–] Tyfud 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just put black ink in his orange spray tan. For one day, maybe he'll be treated like a minority in America. That should terrify him.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah, he and all of his friends/cronies already did blackface in college.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

I'm surprised they don't just declare that he paid the fine successfully rather than go through all that trouble to lower it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's embarrassing at this point. "Don't make your Trumpanzees send death threats to my clerks." Donald makes his Trumpanzees send death threats to the clerks. "Oh, okay, you can post a much smaller bond and have some more time to get the money."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

“Ope, jeepers gosh, looks like you’re still having trouble with it, we can setcha up with a ~~zero~~ negative-interest payment plan there so once yer done makin’ those payments, you’ll get a li’l reward to getcha back on yer feet”

[–] tacosplease 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The gag orders lately have been leaving out the judge, prosecutors, and their families. Wouldn't want an appearance of bias. What's a few death threats between friends?

[–] Tyfud 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As I understand it, it reduces the chances of an appeal if they don't include themselves in the gag order.

[–] tacosplease 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's definitely what they're going for. It just seems like a huge overcorrection. There is way too high of a chance that somebody gets killed by one of Trump's supporters. What appeals court is going to throw out a conviction because the judge tried to protect themselves and the prosecution from political violence instigated by the defendant?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What appeals court is going to throw out a conviction because the judge tried to protect themselves and the prosecution from political violence instigated by the defendant?

If their luck doesn't hold, and they get another judge whom we know values politics over the law but hasn't been impeached yet, they want to make sure to leave as little to interpretation as possible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I guess if nothing else, it's a paper trail and another thing that can be added to a list.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 4 points 9 months ago

They might be waiting for the people to finally do something about it. The government is infiltrated with members who put the well beings of very few over the majority of the people. We are improperly raging against the machine

[–] Furbag 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Gag orders have narrow definitions so as not to infringe upon 1st amendment speech Trump gets around this by raging at every every person in the periphery of the specific gag order. Can't talk shit about the jurors or the court clerks? Well judge such-and-such, you didn't say I couldn't say anything about you or your daughter! So he spews his vitriol at them and gets away with it. That's why he got slapped with like 3 increasingly more broad gag orders during the NY fraud trial. Telling Trump to shut his mouth is guaranteed to elicit a reaction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Judges have already verbally reprimanded him for violating the gag orders and then do nothing to actually hold him accountable, just issue another toothless gag order. What did those 3 gag orders accomplish when he just kept violating them?

Normal people are put in contempt when they violate judges orders multiple times.

[–] Furbag 3 points 9 months ago

Oh, I agree. I would have loved to see actual enforcement of all of his previous gag orders, especially when he immediately turns around and violates it thoughtlessly. It just seems like he's always on the fringe of a technicality or simply given a verbal reprimand and the courts are willing to let him off the hook as a result. Every single time.

Nothing could convince me more that we are living in a society with a two-tiered justice system than watching this madness unfold. It does not seem to matter how obviously guilty Trump is, the system was designed to give rich and famous people the benefit of the doubt every step of the way. His evasion of justice and open mockery of the law are infuriating to no end.