this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
133 points (95.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17493 readers
747 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

So the article explains that official tournaments use a unique words list that contains a lot of generous words like "zzz" and "aa". Mostly intended to allow high scoring words for people who studied their list.

The company that maintains the list has added a lot more of these "not a real word but it scores high so we added it" words.

For some highlight words from the article: MIREPOIXS, HORSEFEATHERSES, SUBSPECIESES, GRATINEEED

Players are complaining that high level tournaments are basically going to be competitions for who knows the most gibberish from the tournament word list and it is alienating the general population from joining tournaments and scrabble clubs.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MIREPOIXS, HORSEFEATHERSES, SUBSPECIESES, GRATINEEED

Did smeagol write this list?

[–] VindictiveJudge 8 points 1 year ago

Truly, a win for mutant hobbits everywhere.

[–] Sanctus 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Shouldn't the official word list just be the dictionary? Isn't that the point?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Which dictionary? Merriam Webster added almost 700 "words" this year, including shit like: TTYL, finsta, bussin, cromulent, doggo, simp, goated, and more. I feel like they are slowly becoming urbandictionary.com.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, their job is to provide definitions for the words people use in language, not to gatekeep what words are "good enough" to be defined.

I hear each of the words you've listed all the time, they're part of our language whether we like it or not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point was more about which dictionary do you use and less about the exact words added. Webster added them, but Oxford and American Heritage didn't.

[–] Maalus 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use all of em and if it appears in any it's a word

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Now I want to play a game of scrabble where you play a complete nonsense word, and your points are the number of Google results for that word - lowest points wins. And maybe you have 5 letters instead of 7.

[–] Sanctus 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would rather be able to spell out bussin' for points than zzzz, aaa, or Mieropoix. At least it is a word people actually use in conversation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mirepoix is an ordinary word in cooking, but it’s an uncountable noun and they’re inventing a fake plural, like “featherses”.

[–] Sanctus 5 points 1 year ago

Didnt it specifically say horsefeatherses in one of those comments? I start drawing the line there.

[–] joel_feila 1 points 1 year ago

I have never heard or seen mieropoix before.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Cromulent is a perfectly cromulent word.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Modern dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive. They don't tell you how things should be spelled, or what meaning they should have. Instead, they report how things are spelled and what people think they mean in the real world.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I knew Meriiam Webster was going to shit when they added "literally" as "figuratively" because people use it facetiously.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's the point of it, though. People use "literally" as "figuratively, and it should be recorded as such. It doesn't matter that it's facetious or ironic, it's still used that way commonly.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure the tournaments are just memorising lists. A man won the French competition without being able to speak French... He just memorised the accepted words.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Words in scrabble should be things that people actually use outside scrabble. It's fair if that makes some leeway for slang. It's also fair if it means that some really obscure words that nobody really uses get in. But, this seems over the line because they're taking words that nobody uses, and tacking on un-grammatical endings.

[–] reddig33 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m amazed that they allow Zzz. It’s not really a word.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, compared to some of those other ones it's perfectly cromulent. At least it means something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It truly embiggens the spirit of the game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is "bam" a word? It seems like a word, but it's an onomatopoeia, just like zzz. Neither are very accurate to the sounds they make, and neither are truly words... I'd let someone play bam without thinking about it, so I could be convinced to allow zzz

[–] reddig33 2 points 1 year ago

Zzz has no vowels.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My horsie has featherses, silly hobbitses

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 10x number of new words added compared to previous editions, and the nonsensical nature of so many of the new entries, says it has to be AI. There's no way some of those would make it past a human editor (except one lazily accepting everything the AI suggests as truth).