this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
1149 points (99.1% liked)

196

17133 readers
3053 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Such a joke. While I personally believe everyone should pay their fair share... Winning lotto or winning at the casino ect, should not be taxed.

However if you use that money and make more money with it you should be properly taxed.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think if they only advertised the post-tax number, there wouldn't really be a problem. Like, "hey, the jackpot is some amount, and after tax you could win 400 million"—that would be fine. As it is, they're kinda just building resentment for taxes in general by making your final winnings seem so disappointing, even though it's still 400 million.

[–] RagingRobot 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's always on the consumer to pay all taxes for some reason. Even with sales tax. I didn't make a sale why am I the one paying the tax?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Hey, now. We don’t want to charge business taxes! That’s anti-business! We’re anti- people in this country. Businesses are tax exempt because they’re the real citizens. Those gross, floppy pEoPlE are what we use to make money for businesses!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

God, I hate sales tax. "This thing is $1.99? No it isn't."

[–] wolfpack86 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the amount is also variable as it's not a lump sum..

If you take lump sum and not the 30 year annuity, you take about a 50% hair cut off the prize money alone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Hmm...

I mean, they could advertise the 30-year annuity as a separate number, then. There are still ways to make this work. I'm just saying, not framing taxes as if they were a punishment would make the whole thing much less annoying.

Not taxing the winnings at all, or just taxing them before they get into the pot, might be the easiest solution, I guess. My only contention with that is, well, now we're just edging into the fact that I don't really like lotteries. Certainly not on this scale.

[–] DreamlandLividity 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And its not like it is business profit, unless you can put the tickets you buy as business expenses. To me, it is in the same category as gifts. Should not be taxed.

[–] Yawweee877h444 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I violently disagree with you.

Gambling and playing lottery is a method to take a risk and get essentially free money by doing nothing, other than taking the risk. Personally I think anything like this gambling related should be taxed up the wazoo. Definitely more than 50%. And that taxed amount should ideally go back to fund things like schools and stuff good for everyone.

Final note, if you ain't happy with 400M free money, you cray cray.

[–] coriza 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

In my country the lottery is taxed at the collection step, so the money divided and advertised is already after taxes. I think that makes more sense, you collect the money and the law specifically distributes this taxed money for specific budgets and the winnings advertised are the real one.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US effectively does both: the lotteries are run by the states and total prizes are much less than total ticket sales, generating net revenue for the state. Winnings are taxed like other income, meaning there are federal taxes and in many states state taxes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The whole system gets even worse when you look at it. They prop it up as an "education lottery", "This will help finance our schools!" In reality, they supplement education funding. I.E. they remove 2mil from state funding and put 2 mil in from the jackpot. They will continue lowering educational spending and use the assets in other areas they want.

When the lottery legislation was first written, it stated, “The net revenues generated by the lottery shall not supplant revenues already expended or projected to be expended for those public purposes, and lottery net revenues shall supplement rather than be used as substitute funds for the total amount of money allocated for those public purposes.” However, this sentence was removed right before voting, opening the door for legislators to use lottery revenues as a replacement for state funding.

The 2005 legislation stated lottery proceeds for education purposes would be allocated by the State Lottery Commission in the following manner: 50% for class-size reductions, 40% for school construction, and 10% for college scholarships. In 2013, lawmakers passed legislation giving themselves the power to allocate lottery proceeds for any education purposes, not just class-size reductions, school construction, and college scholarships.

In FY 2018, the majority of NC Education Lottery funding (57%) went to non-instructional support personnel, with 19% going to school construction, 12% to pre-kindergarten, 6% LEA transportation, 4% to need-based college scholarships, and 2% to UNC need-based aid. (link)

non-instructional support personnel, you know the over inflated administration that plagues education, now being supported by a lottery. Like most legislation, it started as something grand but slowly got mutilated till it's a net-negative effect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I’m in NC. The radio pundits during the runup to the General Assembly’s lottery vote were about the potential revenues being around $300 million. Further discussion was how that was the total budget for Forsyth County (Winston-Salem vicinity) schools. NC has 100 counties, some smaller, some larger, and for the GA to vote for it was viewed by the pundits as a really dumb thing.

The very thing of it becoming a replacement rather than a supplement to the school budgets was obvious to anyone who knows American (and especially NC) politics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US likes surprising people with something negative even if they don't have to, jumpscare ropefuel is like one of their founding principles. Kicks in asses, wakeup calls and reality checks are cornerstones of their society. Emotional pump and dump.

[–] _stranger_ 4 points 2 months ago

As an USian, I can verify this is true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's even more insane when you realize that lottery tickets are basically double taxing, because you already pay the sales tax when you purchase the ticket so not only are you getting taxed on the purchase of the ticket but you're also getting taxed on the winnings, so essentially they're getting double the tax per ticket

[–] Chev 13 points 2 months ago

Or the winning amount should represent the money you get after tax just like in every other country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I personally think the tickets should be hella taxed, not the winnings. However lotteries are immoral ASF anyways and should probably be banned so 🤷‍♀️

[–] Ultraviolet -2 points 2 months ago

The stated jackpot isn't just before tax, it's the future amount that it would be worth after collecting interest for 30 years.