this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
102 points (73.4% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus 105 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Regardless of one's opinion of the current situation, that he is considering it is a good thing. There are probably no good options, but if the pros and cons are weighed and the conclusion is that Biden endorsing someone else is the better choice, then that's what should be done.

Regardless, voting this November is about voting against fascism, regardless of who the Dem candidate is.

[–] Xanis 36 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I still want him to go full Dark Brandon and save his race by being a complete and unmitigated lunatic pointed at Trump and the GOP.

BUT...

...if you all want him to drop out, you need to push collectively. He has given in before.

[–] PugJesus 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'd prefer him to stay in if, realistically speaking, he is capable of doing so.

However, I also recognize that, even if he IS capable of doing so, he has not inspired confidence in the electorate in being capable of doing so. That alone may mandate his replacement even if all it was was a bad night.

I don't think he's in rapid decline - but if he is, or if he isn't but feels he cannot convincingly portray himself as well going forward, stepping down might be the right choice.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think what’s really put strain on his mental capacity is the campaign. It’s one thing to be in a demanding position as an elected official, at his age, but then add on all the campaign stops, speeches, and events. It’s too much for most people.

[–] anon6789 6 points 5 months ago

Exactly, I posted this article in a comment above:

Guardian, 2008: Fatigue and racism threaten to knock Obama bandwagon off the road

Barack Obama was showing signs of campaign fatigue. Sitting on a picnic bench in a park on Pagoda Street, Indianapolis, in discussion with a group of 30 supporters, he told a story about the "modest" background of himself and his wife, Michelle. And 10 minutes later, seemingly having forgotten, he told them it all again.

It is hardly surprising, given that he has been on the road almost non-stop since Christmas, battling Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination. In recent weeks, he has often seemed absent-minded, forgetting the names of the towns he is in.

Tiredness is the least of Obama's problems. After a relatively smooth and well-planned march towards the Oval Office, his campaign is facing its greatest crisis. "He is in the middle of a shit storm," one of the journalists travelling with him said.

Obama handled his 2 terms fine after that. He was as beat down by the campaign as Biden and he was almost 40 years younger!

[–] Xanis 7 points 5 months ago

HA! A reasonable take. Thank you! Sometimes it really does feel like I'm trying to convince a wall to not stand in the way.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 6 points 5 months ago

Samesies. But seriously, my man Joe is asking for four more years of a very physically punishing job. He doesn’t need it like some deranged narcissistic sociopaths we could mention.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The dark Brandon stuff is 98% fluff, talk, and meme. Biden has already said that they're going to take the high road on the presidential immunity matter. So, we're going to high road all the way to fascism while waiting for Biden to do the meme.

[–] NounsAndWords 3 points 5 months ago

Tbf, that's exactly the sort of thing you would say before, during, and after a state sanctioned assassination.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He should do both. Abuse his new powers to somehow cause a sever detriment to Trump or Fascism or both, then be like 'Oh im not the guy for the next four years.' It would literally be having your cake and eating it two. Biden actual having balls and Biden stepping aside are both moves that will more than likely track super hard with anyone who's not already locked for Trump.

Scorch Trumps earth then drop the mic and the chances they call for a Democratic encore will skyrocket I'd bet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

If he steps down it would be the perfect time for him to be dark brandon because of he's attacking in the right ways trump couldn't help by focus on bidden and not the new guy, trump might even take resources meant to attack the new guy to hit back at bidden

I really want biden to dangle a parden over trump's head and call him out for taking oil money because he poor

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

stepping down would be the ultimate dark brandon move. he could honestly become vice president instead

[–] NineMileTower 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Michigander here to tell you that Whitmer is a fantastic option.

[–] dhork 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

She is almost exactly 8 years younger than Harris. If Biden flat-out resigns over this, I expect President Harris to nominate Whitmer as her VP. I look forward to that hearing in the House (since they have to approve the appointment too, although they will likely just sit on it.)

Imagine Harris-Whitmer for 8 years, then Whitmer-someoneyounger for 8 more

[–] homesweethomeMrL 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Harris is not a viable ticket head.

The sturm und drang of this is gonna be a friggin nightmare if they don’t do this cleanly.

[–] dhork 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If Biden flat-out resigns, then Harris becomes President. Do you really think the party will choose someone other than the sitting President?

It will even make Trump have to change all his "45-47" hats to "45-48" .

[–] homesweethomeMrL 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

WHY would Biden resign? That’s just several layers of bullshit on top of headache. What, to promote Harris? I don’t think that’s likely or worth it. She’d cause a rift and it’ll be a mess of a convention.

As this hasn’t been done before, AND it’s post-trump, yes democrats can choose other than sitting president. It’d be ugly, but Harris just doesn’t have the support, so they’d do it.

[–] dhork 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I personally think Biden would have no choice to resign. How can go to the American people and say "I guess I can't do this job anymore", but still do it for a few more months?

It would have been different had he come to that conclusion 12 months ago, and allowed a contested primary for his replacement, but he didn't. The only firm conclusion to come out of the Primaries is that most democrats want the incumbant. So, give Harris the benefit of incumbency.

It's the simplest path to make the convention not a shitshow. And remember that they need to settle this before the convention, because of the registration deadlines in Ohio and other states. If they leave this to rhe convention, there a real chance the Democrat won't be on the ballot in Ohio.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He’s not saying he can’t do it for six more months. That’s kinda weird to imagine that, on top of everything.

But hey, even if he got hit by a bus and Harris got sworn in, barring some superhuman politicking she’d have a floor fight.

[–] dhork 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If Biden resigned, along with a direct endorsement of Harris, there will be no floor fight. The party will coalesce around the sitting President.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say “not gonna happen” but given the DNC’s track record that could be one of the many ways they could fumble this for a loss.

[–] dhork 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Harris is not an automatic loss, as long as the electorate is not composed solely of Lemmy users.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 5 months ago

Automatic, no. There will be lots of garment-rending and gnashing of teeth. Nothing so banal as an automatic loss.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 1 points 5 months ago

It will even make Trump have to change all his "45-47" hats to "45-48" .

And suddenly a shitload of dipshits are wearing Kamala merch. I'm on board.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Whitmer-Polis if we're doing fantasy football

[–] dhork 3 points 5 months ago

Shoot, I wanted to draft Polis! Now the highest one left on the board is Buttigieg....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Lol, in that scenario picking a new VP requires confirmation from both house and Senate.

Do you think the house GOP would confirm anyone? Or keep the spot open and just have Speaker Johnson next in line?

How do we feel about a woman of color as president with the next in line being a christo-facist? What's the presidential odds of assassination, 14%?

[–] very_well_lost 1 points 5 months ago

I don't think anyone seriously expects Biden to resign over this, but there is still a chance he'll announce that he's no longer seeking reelection, like LBJ in 68.

[–] assassin_aragorn 6 points 5 months ago

I'm glad he's taking it seriously. It looks like the next few events he does are going to be really important in determining his next steps. If they go badly, I think he drops. If they go well, he'll probably stay in.

I also 100% believe that Biden is fully aware of this article and likely encouraged the NYT's source to approach the media. Part of evaluating this whole thing is going to be gauging public opinion and testing the waters.

[–] dhork 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The only way it can possibly go down is to pick Harris. Biden already picked Harris as his understudy. And all those votes for Biden in the primaries were also implicitly for Harris, given Biden's age.

[–] PugJesus 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Harris doesn't inspire confidence for me, but she may still be the better choice. Regardless, if she's the Dem candidate, she has my total support for this election, because I would very much like a choice in every election of my life going forward.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think pushing the first black VP aside could go more poorly than people expect. Whether or not we like Harris (I don't), shes been a loyal VP this whole time and I can't imagine she's going to like having her only shot at the big chair taken away from her. I think keeping Harris as VP no matter what is the best path forward. You keep some continuity, you don't really piss off any voters, and you keep everyone unified. A unified front is the only possible way any of this will work. If everyone fractures and infights until November we're still fucked.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Disagree. She’s not Obama, or even Hillary, or . . . Well the list of people she’s not is (Everyone) - 1, but still.

If this is a thing, and they want to avoid a fight, and they recognize Harris isn’t going to do it, then they will go very far to ensuring Harris is on board with - whatever. Cushy corporate gig, committee assignments, cabinet post, whatever she wants.

We think of VPs as automatic Presidents when there’s no President but that’s not what’s (very theoretically) happening. She has no more particular claim to it than anyone. Saying she does is just not right.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 2 points 5 months ago

If this is a thing, and they want to avoid a fight, and they recognize Harris isn’t going to do it, then they will go very far to ensuring Harris is on board with - whatever. Cushy corporate gig, committee assignments, cabinet post, whatever she wants.

Totally works for me. But her cooperation is going to be absolutely crucial. I don't think she has any claim to the position, but she sure as hell may think she does, that's all.

[–] cabron_offsets 12 points 5 months ago

Fat chance, but Harris could be selfless and participate in the pragmatic realpolitik that we need in order to save the country. I am not sure who’s the best candidate, but I imagine that someone not directly tied to the Israel debacle would be good.

[–] jordanlund 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 5 months ago

Yes. I so want to continue ignoring her. It’d be typical of the DNC to do it though, because she cannot win, and they fucking love that for some goddamned reason.

[–] lemming741 -5 points 5 months ago
[–] dogsnest -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Michelle Obama could drop in and win in an instant in a landslide.

8 more years of Obama is music to the world's ears.

[–] tacosplease 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No she couldn't. Voters like her now because they don't know her as a politician. They would find issues as the campaign progressed.

[–] dogsnest -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're aware who she sleeps with to get to where she is?

It would be Barack-redux magnified, and she can appoint the kids to positions, just like Trump. Nepotism back atcha!