this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
580 points (92.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27134 readers
4514 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Why tf does Argentina let women retire earlier???

[–] dexa_scantron 79 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that sounds about right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Women: get to retire five years earlier than men

Lemmy: Sounds like patriarchal oppression to me!

[–] pyre 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it is though. same with women getting more lenient sentences for the same crimes, custody inequality, etc.

[–] feedum_sneedson 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think a better word might be needed, to be honest.

[–] Drivebyhaiku 6 points 5 months ago

Kyriarchical oppression.

Kyriarchy refers to the overlap of various inequalities caused by gender, race, sexuallity and disability describing overlaps of cross sectionality. It also refers to the practice of problems created by assumed superiority.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It already exists and is called misandry.

[–] pyre -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

why? this is all the results of men being in power, including the odd thing that favors women sometimes, like custody battles being usually easier for women. it comes from the patriarchal view that looking after children is the mother's job and the father barely needs to have anything to do with it.

same here: men are stronger and women are weaker, not to mention women shouldn't be working to begin with but since they do they might as well retire early.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

To me as a layman it immediately brings up a connection to feminism. I don't think that anybody who will want to get men to think different will get very far using the word "patriarchy", given men being more right leaning.

There isn't much substance to my argument than "nuh uh I don't like that word" but it is what it is. There must be some better approach "marketing wise", despite patriarchy being technically correct.

[–] then_three_more 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Britain did until quite recently. Then a group of men went to court, I think hoping to get the men's age lowered to that of women. But of course the government raised the women's age to that of men.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You say that as if it was the men's fault for trying to get equal treatment. Clearly you have no idea how the legal system works.

[–] then_three_more 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how you got that from what I said.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The "of course" makes it clear you dislike the outcome. The long mention of the men who in your eyes "caused" this also makes it pretty obvious what your stance is about this and who you want the scapegoat to be in the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Wow that's some projection. You are reading deeply between the lines to find your take on that one.

I immediately got it as "why would the people in power ever make it easier for those not" but hey why bother with nuanced takes when the Internet will allow you to be angry at your specific beliefs as if they are the only truth, right?

[–] then_three_more 4 points 5 months ago

The "of course" makes it clear you dislike the outcome

Only inasmuch as a desirable outcome would have been the lowering of the age of retirement for men to either that of women or meeting both on the middle. The issue is that the government being the government took it as an excuse to effectively cut welfare.

The long mention of the men who in your eyes "caused" this

To be honest it probably just brought it on sooner. The government would have found it as excuse to raise the retirement age without it being highlighted to them.

also makes it pretty obvious what your stance is about this and who you want the scapegoat to be in the discussion.

No, still don't see it.

[–] SomeGuy69 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because women on average live longer. Strange isn't it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why would that mean they get to retire earlier then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this person's logic makes no sense. This is a solid argument for men retiring earlier.

Personally, I'd say it's probably best if it's just the same for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe opposite? Maybe women live lomger because they retire earlier?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No because women also live longer in countries that do not do this.

Edit: lol at whoever downvoted me for pointing out a statistical fact

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Yeap, women retire at 60 and men retire at 65.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

it's the same in many European countries

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, this seems backwards... Women tend to live longer than men.