this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
344 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18082 readers
3738 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 6 months ago (59 children)

i want the Ukrainians armed and fed and warm, let's get to work

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I think we're starting to get into a "pick two" type situation.

load more comments (58 replies)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere 87 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Republicans singing the Russian anthem as they walk down the Capitol.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_flounder 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Speak up; The Republicans can't hear you over the sound of them licking Putin's boots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser 9 points 6 months ago

The picture you see McConnell looking like he was just startled awake from a nap.

[–] CADmonkey 8 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Honest question from someone who wants to see Ukraine not be overrun by orcs: Why is the US always the one who has to fund wars? There are some countries in the EU that have given a bit of suport, but the guys who are across the ocean seem to be the ones everyone looks to for money. Aren't you clever enlightened boys and girls from the European Union able to take care of this?

Every single time there is some conflict the idiots in charge here have to get big hard-ons and start getting involved. And we are told to stay out of it. But now Ukraine needs money and for some reason everyone focuses on the US providing it. Same with Israel, why are we the ones who have to prop them up?

I'd really like to know. Everyone hates the US until they want money or weapons. We aren't the ones next door to russia, the EU is. And we aren't anywhere near the middle east, so why are we wasting so much money on israel?

[–] Gordito 14 points 6 months ago (4 children)

USA has to respect the nuclear arms treaty... Ukraine was promised protection in return for giving up nuclear weapons.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I have to think our government in the US sees all kinds of strategic, political, and intelligence benefits from having our military spread all over the world. And our money too.

Plus the concept of proxy wars to hurt our enemies without putting ourselves in the line of fire and/or ending the human race.

[–] assassin_aragorn 5 points 6 months ago

This is why we've got such a large defense budget. Our military strength isn't just to protect ourselves, it's so we can also project our influence around the world. It's like if your neighbor has a bunch of guns, and you hear zombies are headed towards you. If there was ever a time their ridiculous spending had a use, it was now.

I do think though European countries should contribute more. They benefit immensely from American influence around the world, don't pay a dime towards it, and then criticize the US for spending so much on defense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Regardless of the EU support not being what it should be, it is in the best interest of the USA to support Ukraine. Russia is a systemic rival and will not stop its aggressive expansion into other countries if they are not stopped in Ukraine. Slightly cynical, but even if Russia wins in the end, dragging this war out by supplying Ukraine also weakens Russia more than the current support weakens the USA.

[–] Luvs2Spuj 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As a Euro, I am qualified to speak for all of Europe on this. TLDR; Decades of poor preparation.

Macron did talk recently about the USA reliance, which I'm sure a search would turn up. Unfortunately it isn't a quick thing to solve, so here we are.

I wish we could provide a fraction of what the USA does.

It is the situation we find ourselves in when none of our countries are investing in the military to any significant levels. Other countries are investing what they can afford, but have no where near the GDP of the USA. I remember Poland provided all they could, but had to say that's all we can do because we have to think about ourselves in case we are next.

I also think that you make most of the weapons in your country, so you are best placed to help.

Long term, I expect the EU to learn nothing from this and the next time someone starts a war it will be the same situation.

Please don't resent us for the situation, because we don't like it either.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

There's a last resort, but I would prefer Congress do their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Dec 12 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy met with U.S. lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to make a last-ditch plea to keep military support flowing as he battles Russia, but faced a skeptical reception from some Republicans.

Heading into winter, with tens of thousands of Ukrainians dead, a yawning budget deficit and Russian advances in the east, Zelenskiy is asking Washington to provide badly needed support.

Wearing a black shirt and olive drab trousers, Zelenskiy was met with sustained applause as he entered a closed-door meeting with U.S. senators, and the chamber's Democratic and Republican leaders pledged their support.

There are just three days before Congress recesses for the year on Friday, and Republicans in the House have until now refused to pass a spending package bill that contains $61.4 billion in Ukraine aid without fiercely disputed changes to U.S. immigration.

Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, who is leading the talks, said he thought lawmakers could reach an immigration deal and pass the spending package before the end of the year.

Ultimately, U.S. troops could be forced to fight Russia, Biden and others warn, if an unchecked Putin invades a European ally covered by NATO's mutual defense commitments.


The original article contains 785 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›