this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
87 points (96.8% liked)

196

16757 readers
4488 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rule

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dnick 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This could be a great platform, but almost completely ruined by an unnecessarily pretentious font.

[–] NielsBohron 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is this better?

Is this better?

I like the other one because this one seems too sparse and I wasn't really shitposting for legibility.

[–] Godnroc 22 points 1 year ago

"shitposting for legibility" is the best thing I've heard today.

[–] Plum 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NielsBohron 2 points 1 year ago

Pre-cise-ly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does #4 interact with laws on hate speech, harassment, etc?

[–] pory 5 points 1 year ago

I'd argue that fighting and punishing hate speech would be protected by Tenet II, which takes priority over "other laws".

[–] NielsBohron 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh, the phrasing is a bit on the libertarian side for my liking (are we still doing phrasing?), but I like the sentiment. I take the "social contact" view of the Paradox of Tolerance, so speech and rhetoric that deprives others of their rights should not be protected, IMHO.

Plus, this is designed more as a personal code of ethics rather than system of government, so I'm not really too worried about "enforcing" any of these. And since I personally don't see a conflict when it comes to limiting the speech of others if it is inciting violence or encouraging discrimination, I think it's ok the way it's written.

But hey, to thine own ~~stuff~~ self be true. Write your own version if you like and share it around.

[–] Donjuanme -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too many times the left ignores #6, and asks the right why they don't do the same.

[–] skeezix 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because for the right, it’s usually intentional, not a “mistake”. For them hurting and marginalizing certain people is the point.

[–] NielsBohron 11 points 1 year ago

Plus, the left is far more likely to hold people accountable and own up to mistakes. Remember Al Franken? When was the last time a politician on the right did anything other than double-down or change the subject when faced with a scandal?