this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
140 points (83.3% liked)

politics

19149 readers
3629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus 127 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about we don't let the dictator who is shouting his plans to the world run for president?

[–] foggy 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Props to Colorado for actually having this discussion.

Shame on the whole rest of the country for not...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

MN and FL have already been over it, with different results. Ten other states have cases pending.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (85 children)

“But what I will say, too, though, is I think everybody should vote for Joe Biden if they want our democracy to survive,” she added.

Cue the people who want to clutch their pearls like, "BuT I DoN't WaNt ThIs DeMoCrAcY tO sUrViVe!" as if they have an alternative option that isn't a Trump-fueled fascist dystopia.

[–] billiam0202 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think there's an alarming number of Americans who are realizing the government is the only thing between them and the violent fantasies they desperately want to enact.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same people who are afraid to visit New York or Chicago today think that they will thrive in a lawless dystopia.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or that war-torn husk, Seattle

[–] Burn_The_Right 7 points 1 year ago

Seattle? Conservatives swear it was burned to the ground along with Portland. They really do believe these cities were demolished into rubble. It's bizarre.

Conservatism is a mental illness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisisawayoflife 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't think it will be a lawless utopia, do they? They want strict application of laws on people, just not corporations. Unless those corporations directly harm them, then it's bad corporation.

I see it as akin to how Nazis pushed the idea that the Weimar government was soft on crime (liberals just didn't understand how to apply "justice"), so they opened Dachau to show their fellow Germans how "criminals" should be dealt with. It served as a primer on how they would operate the kz network in Poland and elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Wilhoit's Law : Conservatism consists of one principle: there needs to be an in-group whom the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group whom the law binds but does not protect.

[–] assassin_aragorn 9 points 1 year ago

At the least the number of Americans simultaneously realizing this about their neighbors is pretty high too.

load more comments (84 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365 45 points 1 year ago (14 children)

....what's the dark reason? Was there something new, or the same "end of democracy" we've known very well about for about 8 years now?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that thing she participated in.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I came to the comments to have that question answered. Because fuck this clickbait title. And fuck huffington post generally. If I wanted an article that was just a bunch of snappy white liberals tweeting...I'd go on twitter.

[–] samus12345 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the same “end of democracy” we’ve known very well about for about 8 years now

It's that.

[–] RizzRustbolt 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, the article says that she's personally planning to go to the homes of every person that either doesn't vote or votes for Trump and snap the necks of their children.

[–] samus12345 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would at least be saying something new.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet, she’s still registered as a Republican. 🤔

[–] Fondots 31 points 1 year ago

Probably not the case with her, but I'm registered as a Republican to vote in their primaries. The way the party has gone though it's going to be a cold day in hell before I vote for a Republican in a general election.

There's a lot I disagree with Democrats on, but in general I can usually live with whoever they end up putting up as a candidate. I may not be thrilled about some of them, but they're usually not trying to send us headfirst into a fascist hellhole.

Republicans though, while pretty much all shitty, are a bit of a mixed bag, and I'd rather try to head off the trumps, Santoses, DeSantises, etc. before they make it to the general election.

load more comments
view more: next ›