this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
224 points (97.1% liked)

News

23653 readers
2574 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the past six years, 19 states have made efforts to move to year-round daylight saving time. So what’s in the way?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just so you guys know, Mexico did away with DST last year. It's been great not changing the clock twice a year.

Come on US... Stop dragging your feet.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

But dragging their feet is the only thing our government is good at now. What would they have left?

[–] nutsack 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't care what the offset is. it's just fucking numbers. if I'm getting up at something called four versus something called six it doesn't make a difference to me. I just don't want the numbers to CHANGE twice a year

[–] Salamendacious 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm with you. Either that or make the day it changes a universal holiday. One or the other.

[–] nutsack 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there is absolutely no reason to change the offset

[–] Salamendacious 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All I really care about personally in the "spring" ahead. It's difficult for me to go to work with an hour less sleep. I have obligations that make it hard for me to go to bed earlier than I do.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hear me out. We keep the fall back but remove spring forward. Yes, things will get really odd in like four years but think of the beauty of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should spring ahead at 2 PM on Friday. Everyone gets to go home an hour early from work and we have the whole weekend to adjust.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meco03211 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read an interesting article that said insurance companies lose tons of money because of time changes. Animals supposedly get used to traffic being low/high at certain times of day (based on the sun cause they don't have watches). So when the time changes, they keep their same routine and end up causing more accidents while crossing roads they are used to being empty.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The week after we move clocks forward in the spring, thereby "losing an hour", there is a marked increase in car collisions and heart attacks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kinda absurd if you think about it. We're here arguing about Standard Time vs Daylight Saving Time while people are literally dying every year due to losing sleep every spring. I wish more states would just bypass Congress and revert back to Standard Time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derf82 26 points 1 year ago (29 children)

I know some think permanent standard time is best. But I respectfully disagree, for several reasons.

First, the argument for standard time is that we need the light in the morning to wake up. And, sure, that would be great. But with standard time, most people are already getting up in the dark. Sunrise only moves to 7am or later around here. A lot of people are already up earlier to get kids on buses (my bus went at 6:45) and to work starting between 7 and 8.

Meanwhile, look at what happens to evening light. Sunsets will go from 6 to 5, and many will travel home in the dark, or simply have no light when the get home, with hours to go before sleep.

The fact is, winter just doesn’t have enough light to go around. So we have to pick our poison. I’d rather get home with some light.

Second, no one considers what would happen in the summer. Here, sunrise would come at 5 am, too early and disruptive to sleep. If light would wake us up better in the winter, than it would wake us up too soon in the summer.

Third, people say we tried it in the 70s and everyone hated it. But when it happened, we didn’t just stay on daylight savings, we switched in the fall, and then back in January, an abrupt change in the darkest time of the year rather than the gradual change it should have been since fall.

And even then, many people lived it. There were people that didn’t, sure, but it is wrong to say it was universally hated.

But make we just need to compromise. Move the clocks 30 minutes and be done with it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But make we just need to compromise. Move the clocks 30 minutes and be done with it.

I was with you until this. But that's because I'm a programmer and time stuff is hard enough before you start using minutes instead of hours.

I think putting the sun's zenith at 1pm would be better year round. Even with that my kids still wake up before dawn starting in October, and I'd rather have daylight when I'm awake.

[–] derf82 7 points 1 year ago

I’m sure it’s already figured out. India is already 30 minutes off the rest of the world.

But I was mostly joking. Because I want the madness to end.

But I totally agree. 1 pm is mush more the meridian of most people’s day how we typically actually live.

[–] Salamendacious 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather have light in the evening but I honestly just want to get rid of the changing.

[–] derf82 5 points 1 year ago

I hate standard time, but I’d still rather stop changing even with it.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People arguing for our against really need to give their latitude. I'd imagine the further north you go, the more you are in favor of permanent dst.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I'm at 56°N. DST does exactly fuck all but mess with my sleep. I'd rather just stay at one time all fuckin year. In winter it doesn't make a fuckin lick of difference if the sun rises at 8 or 9 or 10, it's dark when I leave the house, and it's dark well before I get back in.

I used to live at 49°N and that was actually worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The opposite. For northern latitudes, the time switch is actually somewhat beneficial. People generally don't love waking up and going to work/school/whatever in the pitch black. DST doesn't magically "save daylight." The total amount is daylight is the same for either.

The only real solution is permanent Standard Time. Local businesses and governments already shift their business hours as they see fit for other reasons, so keeping "summer hours" and "winter hours" is totally reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't mind dark mornings, since I'm already at work by 7am each day. But not being able to walk/bike in a park safely each afternoon, not being able to cook outside, or hang out with friends in the daylight is a bit sad. And also SAD as in the disorder since we are now inside during the only hours of daylight...

[–] mkhopper 5 points 1 year ago

This right here is the reason I call for permanent DST.
I'm at latitude 42N and having less daylight time in the evenings during the warm months would be awful.

[–] derf82 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While we might not love going to work in pitch black, we don’t care to have all our evening in it, either. As you say, the total amount of daylight is the same, so we have to pick our poison. I’d rather have more light in the evening. I will hate the 5pm darkness that comes tomorrow.

Morning our schedules is no better than moving out clocks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're kind of having the same argument in two different threads ... I'm not sure which thread is better.

Morning our schedules is no better than moving out clocks.

It's objectively better! "Moving clocks" is effectively the same as moving schedules for individuals, but to practically coordinate with others, everybody must change their clock and therefore their schedule. Individuals and organizations already construct their schedules as needed.

Part of the issue is that we all work too damn much, anyways. The 40 hour, 5 day work week (and thus the 9-to-5) is an arbitrary concept that research has indicated may be just as effective as a shorter work week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derf82 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

41N.

And yes, this is true. But why should we be denied just because those closer to the tropics don’t have a problem? Or perhaps time zones should be rather diagonal so the the north can get later sunsets.

And those wanting standard time should also give their latitude. And rather or not someone is on the east or west end of the time zone makes a huge difference. Those further east in the time zone sees earlier sunrises and sunsets and are also more apt for daylight savings. For instance, much of New England would probably be better off in the Atlantic time zone. As it is under DST, the sun rises before 5am in Portland, ME, and EST would put sunrise before 4am! Sadly, being in the same time as certain business centers like New York and Boston (Maine wants to be the same time as Boston, and Boston the same as NYC) have made many bad time zone boundaries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Standard time is superior for the simple reason that the sun is highest in the sky at noon.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

UTC is superior. Everywhere sets their local schedule by what they need to like if the sun actually matters to them, and it gets rid of confusion. The real issue is that people have some idea that work should start at 8am or whatever in all areas. Or that 5 o’clock should be happy hour. That’s not helpful in any meaningful way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Exactly, people need to get over the fixation on the number the clock shows.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

States can only move to permanent Standard time without congressional approval, and when you consider that congress couldn't agree who their own leader was for 22 days, there's no hope getting them to agree on something like DST.

The real question, if states are serious about getting rid of the change to DST, why didn't they just pick standard time? No approval is needed to switch to full standard time.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Because people prefer the extra daylight in the evening which is why everyone wants DST hours.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender 6 points 1 year ago

Red herring to appear like they are doing something for the people. As was pointed out below, we tried year round DST in the 70s and people hated it so much we went back to switching our clocks. It seems that year round standard time would make the best compromise, but that would be doing something, rather than just appearing to do things.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Simple. Just keep one. I prefer daylight saving.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Its_Always_420 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way it makes sense to do this is at the federal level so the whole country changes at once. Doing it at the state level is stupid, confusing and frankly just a waste of time. This country has very real and serious problems it needs to deal with, and daylight savings time is not one of them.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's not fix anything until the things we won't fix get fixed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And even further, doing the easy stuff will help you get the hard stuff done.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Except hasn't it been well-proved that standard time is a better stopping state?

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 1 year ago

Hahaha. Almost everyone but Indiana, which used to have permanent standard time until Mitch Daniels got elected and he'd always had a bug up his ass about adopting DST. And now Indiana is like, "we ain't goin' back to not moving our clocks around!"

load more comments
view more: next ›