Rules for thee not for me.
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
690 points (92.4% liked)
Not The Onion
12533 readers
1208 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The only thing worse than having to go to the office to watch a video of Elon, is watching him in person
Yeah then you might get a whiff of his musk
load more comments
(1 replies)
This just in, Elon bans getting high at work
load more comments
(3 replies)
What a little piss baby
My boss recently did the same because he “accidentally” schedule his vacation at the same time of our yearly goal setting meeting. Lol.
But fuck me for buying plane tickets for my vacation 6 months in advance when they were on sale and I didn’t have the days approved off. $300 wasted and a giant fuck you a year later. 👍
That's the thing though. When we schedule those days off, it is more of a friendly notice than a request. I am going, you can't stop me. If you would rather have to replace an employee and retrain them, be my guest. Its not worth it for them unless you do something easily replaceable.
Exactly! It is not a Time Off Request. It is a Time Off NOTIFICATION.
Yeah. As a manager, I'm often surprised that team members who report to me don't actually realize this.
Actual conversation I've had:
"Thanks for letting me know your time off plans. I have to cover this logistic, but we will work around it."
"I mean, I can change it if it's too much trouble."
"How would your spouse feel about that?"
"Pissed."
"And if your spouse wanted you to change jobs, how long would that take?
"Oh."
(Oh meaning - At most, four weeks in an average market for their skillset, more like 3 months in the current unprecedentedly slow market. Either way, it's hell for me covering their lost expertise and then training their replacement.)
"Yeah. Thanks for letting me know. We will make it work. Tell your spouse I said 'Hi' and 'thanks' for the early heads up."
load more comments
(1 replies)
You are completely misrepresenting the power dynamic between employer and employee. The entire reason unions exist is to attempt to correct that power imbalance.
I agree and disagree. For the average low paying job that doesn't require any skill or knowledge, a union is the only arguing power you have. However, if you are hard to replace because of skill/knowledge and you know it, the power balances back. You have the power to say no without consequences.
Obviously don't push it to where the cost of replacing you is worth it for your employer, but you have more power than most realize. Making yourself invaluable only increases your say in how things go. So getting the time you requested off is certainly doable.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
What a punk ass bitch.
That's some real "I'm a big dick" energy
It's basically the story for most VP+ level execs at big tech companies. All parroting RTO rules, while on video in their home office, or from an office that isn't assigned to them...
At this point I'm only surprised about the picture. I've seen photoes of Twitter logo&name being demontaged from their headquarter a year ago, but then I've seen a lot of images of X physically installed somewhere, like this one. Are they real? It looks so, so bad.
Yes, it's real. Originally it lit up so brightly at night that neighbors couldn't sleep and they got the cops involved.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Isn't this the roof of the headquarters? It's always looked like a couple of guys found some metal and bolted it together.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Downvote Musk spam.
The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring him and his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle. Don’t be a useful idiot.
I would agree, but seeing as tho Musk's entire fortune is built on his image, anything that can damage it is good for humanity, and let's be honest he is paying for the shit ton of "Musk the myth, the Legend" articles, so why not boost the ones calling him out?
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I feel for those poor bastards whose work visas are tired to that site.
I'm sure Xwitter pays well but I am surprised that the employees stick around due to all Musk has done to destroy the company.
Yeah. There's some speculation that most of those who stayed are probably stuck due to life circumstances like visa sponsorship.
Edit: I imagine they're not staying for the stock options, at this point, in any case!
load more comments
(1 replies)
There is very little surprising about Elon Musk’s methods of running X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, seemingly into the ground.
I disagree. There is much about it that is very surprising, which is why we're still talking about it. Maybe he meant "There's very little that people should be surprised about, because this shit has been going on for a year now, and it just keeps getting dumber and dumber."
which Yaccarino tweeted about on Wednesday.
Are we still calling it that? Wouldn't she have Xed it?
Xcreted
It's crazy that they had a brand so strong that the name of the company is the word for the thing that the company does and this clown decided to change it.
It would be like Kleenex or Band-Aid changing their name.
load more comments
(1 replies)
How are employees not sabotaging this shit from the inside?
Trying to out-sabotage Elon? It's quite the challenge.
The comedy heist movie almost writes itself.
"We created a backdoor into the system, but now we're just waiting because it crashed and it's down right now."
"We smuggled an EMP into the data center, but it didn't do anything because it turns out everything critical is actually running on someone's laptop in the accounting team."
load more comments
(1 replies)
As I understand, a significant amount of the employees who stayed are ones who depend on steady work to stay in the country. For these folks, sabotaging their company could ultimately end in being deported. IDK about you but I don't think that's the hill I'd die on.
load more comments
(1 replies)
if that big dumb annoying "x" at the top of the building is there illegally
HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING would the law actually prosecute anyone for trying to remove it without their consent?
i mean... it'd be tricky to get rid of that thing without employing dangerous tools. it's not like anyone would condone dropping thermite or munitions on it from a drone... and you probably can't fit power tools on a drone or exert enough force with a drone for those power tools to be effective.
but still, just as a thought experiment, how might one go about removing an unsanctioned structural eyesore from a building, as a "public service"?
Some BBs could probably smash enough of the lights in it from a distance?
Or maybe paintballs to make it green
ooh i like that
i bet a drone could carry an airbrush actually
fly right up and dye the bulbs trans flag colors X3
view more: next ›