French newspapers don't mention any of those for now, the only mention is that the methodology is similar to previous far-left activism (source: https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/live/2024/07/26/en-direct-attaque-massive-contre-la-sncf-reprise-progressive-du-trafic-un-tiers-des-trains-circuleront-vendredi-apres-midi_6258634_3224.html), which could be a disguise of course. As to why the far-left would do that, there are radical-ecologists that argue it is an unacceptable waste simply for entertainment, considering the climate crisis, for example. It could also be both, local activists helped by foreign influence, willingly or not.
oce
I thought intolerance based on origin would be pretty close.
The .ml tankie echo chamber is going to be hard to exit.
I have heard a lot of xenophobic (I guess it counts?) jokes about Germans, reducing them to Nazis and pretending they all talk like Hitler speeches.
Ça peut être des groupes politiques radicaux internes opposés aux JOs aussi. Certains semblent s'en réjouir ici. Je pense qu'il suffit d'avoir un cheminot avec un peu d'expérience pour connaître les points critiques.
Ça peut aussi être les deux, des radicaux locaux aidés par un acteur étranger, à leur insu ou non.
That's military not civilians, it seems justified as long as there are authoritarian regimes with imperialist ideas. Completely unrelated to civilians having military weapons. Unless you're saying civilians should have nukes too.
Because they were expecting a foreign military invasion, it still is military duty.
Ah, didn't know you would consider most of EU and the developed world to be fascist, thanks for the insult.
Green energy that could go to higher priority sectors like decarborning housing, food production and transportation . Carbon free doesn't mean no ecological impact, of course it's better than fossil fuel, but it still a lot of ressources extracted and place taken over nature (which is the first cause of biodiversity loss). So ideally we should only destroy so much for essential needs.
Seems Ukrainian stopped it pretty well without having civilians carrying military weapons outside of military duty.
Is that because they mostly make money from democrats but in some specific places it's more profitable to pay republicans instead?
This is two days ago and not related to today's railway sabotage, for now.