this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
929 points (87.4% liked)

politics

18081 readers
3489 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All 10 of the largest U.S. meat and dairy companies have lobbied against environmental and climate policies, resisting climate regulations, including rules on greenhouse gases and emissions reporting. This is according to a study by New York University, which examined the political influence of the 10 largest meat and dairy companies in the United States.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbouBenAdhem 164 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

100% of the top 10 meat and dairy companies.

That should be in the title—otherwise it implies that every family dairy in the country has its own team of lobbyists.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The title is misleading, however the top companies take up such a huge market share that it might as well be a true statement. I know there are companies trying to make some difference and I hate media sensationalism

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Closer to the truth though. Most are part of organizations that include lobbyists that would oppose anything that negatively impacts the industry. I don't find that particularly nefarious of course.

[–] AbouBenAdhem 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It’s not that the title isn’t still mostly true—it’s that the impossible statement discredits the rest of the article.

[–] 9point6 24 points 8 months ago

Precisely this, if you've got a point to make, don't sensationalise the headline, it only makes it easy for people to discredit and ignore without even reading the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is a sensationalist title, sigh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

100% of the top 10 US meat and dairy companies

Context.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And it would imply companies that make lab-grown meat and animal products, which are often companies formed explicitly in support of environmental sustainability goals, also.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 8 months ago (7 children)

IDK why corporate lobbing is still legal, wtf outlaw it asap

[–] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's legal because the people who benefit from corporate lobbying are the same people who determine what is legal.

[–] rdrunner 9 points 8 months ago

Yup! And it's exactly why the system will never change on its own. The people in power will never voluntarily give up that power. Why does Congress get to vote on its own salary?!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah, what you are missing is that the people who make those laws are the same ones being lobbied, and lobbying means giving money to them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 66 points 8 months ago (52 children)

Huh, well imagine that. The biggest sources of the problem is against doing anything about it.

What I find pretty wild is that our government even helps them do more of it by boosting terrible diet choices, including pushing it onto children.

[–] dual_sport_dork 20 points 8 months ago

It's all about profit. If some new discovery magically made dairy climate friendly but also increased profits by 12%, every producer would be on board tomorrow. They don't give a fuck about climate one way or the other, just profit. It's just that one position allows them to keep making their profits without having to make any changes. No points for guessing which position it is.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] Copernican 47 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Wtf is with quality on lemmy world these days. How is a medium article written like an ethics 101 student using ai assistance news worthy. It's formula 1 sentence summary linked to an article source, with one sentence over generalized conclusion... Over and over and over.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Easy content to make. That simple.

[–] Viking_Hippie 46 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Holy misleading headline, Batman!

I'm not saying that there isn't a problem with the industries, but the 10 largest in one country is NOT "100% of all meat and dairy companies" or anywhere near that!

A sample size of the 10 largest in a country where it's literally impossible to get to the top 10 anything company without truly despicable practices is some supercharged selection bias!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (11 children)

The 4 largest companies control 70% of the market. Markets tend to be one to three companies taking the lions share and then a long tail.

The top 10 will easily round up to 100%.

I'd also be hard pressed to find a meat producer that actually supported climate initiatives and wasn't some super small farmer.

https://www.reuters.com/business/how-four-big-companies-control-us-beef-industry-2021-06-17/

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mago 44 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Very dishonest click bait. Moderators should clean this stuff up in order to prevent redditification.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Seudo 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

100%

10 of the biggest

Always handy when a pop-sci article discredits itself without having to read it.

[–] eskimofry 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

100% is 10 out of all the 10 companies they investigated.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBat 36 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Oh no! Who could've known this? What's next? Oil companies lobbying against environmental and climate policies?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] H0neyc0mb 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know a lot of people are new here but this kind of shit should be moderated better... Link to the study, not someone's blog

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Agreed, this is a blog post from 3 days ago but all of the sources they link in the footer are from early 2021... nothing new here and this article is a biased mess.

That said, there's nothing surprising here anyway, lobbying in the US is just bribery and corruption by another term and obviously these companies are going to do anything they can to defend their profits

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I’m pretty sure this headline is impossible

Also, medium is a blog.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Came here to say this. I have a friend that's a meat and dairy company, and she (yup, 1 person for-profit farm) doesn't lobby for or against shit.

That gets us under 100% already.

[–] Chestnut 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From reading the sub heading out looks like they mean 100% of the top ten largest

They just wanted the click bait headline

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fades 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

fucking meat factories are killing the animals and the goddamn planet

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Ah water is indeed wet.

[–] xantoxis 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You know that this can't possibly be true, because most meat and dairy companies do not have a lobbying arm, right? Right in the first sentence it says it's the top 10 largest, but let's go ahead and put some bullshit in the headline anyway right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I mean, we all know the memes, but there has to be like a nuanced take take on why this is the case, right? Is it literally the case that they just don't give a goddamn about climate change and they're just going to get theirs while they can and to hell with everything else? Because it's going to be awful hard to keep your cows fed when climate change starts fucking up their feed crops, and we're pretty much there right now, as far as I understand it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

The entire system relies on infinite growth in a finite world, trying to find logic in it is futile, never mind ethics..

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Is it literally the case that they just don't give a goddamn about climate change and they're just going to get theirs while they can and to hell with everything else?

Yup, that's my understanding. They probably aren't full on deniers, they know it's real, they just don't want to do the hard work and take the pay cuts that will progress us forward into the future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhoeri 6 points 8 months ago (13 children)

The vegan propaganda campaign is back at it again.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›