this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
405 points (86.4% liked)

World News

39363 readers
4720 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden was asked by a reporter in Israel on Wednesday what made him confident that the Israelis weren't behind the explosion that killed hundreds at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday.

Biden responded that it was "the data I was shown by my Defense Department."

Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded the Gaza hospital blast was likely caused by an errant Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket that fell short of its target.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I just want to respectfully remind everyone that just because this tragedy was likely not perpetrated by Israel, it does not mean they are absolved of any of the hundreds of war crimes they have already committed.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago

They killed multiple journalists earlier this week and killed at least 6 in a strike on a school and this hospital debacle has drowned all of that out.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we hold hamas (and palestine for giving them a holdout) for their war crimes, or is your logic only one-way?

[–] WhiteHawk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, people here are incapable of thinking in anything other than black-and-white

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, is there any place in southern Gaza that isn't packed full of the people they told to move there from the north for 'safety'?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Daiken 85 points 1 year ago (25 children)

The problem I have with this narrative isn't who dropped the bomb. Tbh they're probably right it was a Palestinian missile. It's the sheer audacity for all these western countries to be shocked and say let's figure this out, as Israel just dropped like 6000 bombs in 6 days. They're worried about one bomb but not the 6000 others, cause ya know, those were killing only Hamas and not injured people in a hospital /s.

While the Muslim world looks on in horror at more bombing in a conflict that has been going on for decades, the western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people. Only the US can pressure Israel to accept a two state solution. That's the only peaceful solution possible for this conflict imo. The other solution is to wipe out Gaza and the West Bank and everyday we're getting closer to that.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 20 points 1 year ago

The western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people

Misinformation on the scale of "a building was destroyed that clearly is still intact" deserves focus. If they'll lie about shit that can be confirmed with a tiny bit of research, what else is getting exaggerated?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A two-state-solution doesn't work in part because extremist Muslim groups want the are to be purely Muslim. They would continue to attack Israel with terror tactics, Like they did from the start. What is your solution to that?

[–] Pogbom 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Swap Muslim with Jewish and Israel with Palestine and it's the same problem... to be clear I think both are true but it's kinda weird to single one out.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

I don't know, most of the papers in the UK led with a front page item on how Israel had killed 500 people by bombing a hospital. So if that wasn't actually true, it's quite important.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The reason for the focus is that it was deliberately being used in a disinformation campaign. Were that not the case, I think you're right that it would have faded into the background noise as just one bomb among 6000 others.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 45 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  1. He was asked on the street by a random reporter.

  2. His quote includes "likely"

  3. For the last couple years Bidens off the cuff remarks haven't exactly been reliable.

Yet people are treating this as an official stance of the US Government...

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I’ll take what the president says as the stance of the US government, and I don’t think that’s remotely unreasonable…

If he’s making mistakes with off the cuff remarks, then he needs to stop making off the cuff remarks.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] vertigo3pc 39 points 1 year ago

"Iraq has WMD's" is a similar statement, backed by an entire administration, that also led to unnecessary deaths.

Its a political statement, because if Israel did attack the hospital, then that's another outright war crime right after Israel was threatened by Jordan, Lebanon, and Iran.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Uh, did you miss this part?

Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't consider the Pentagon to be a reliable source for information when they have a vested interest in the conflict. Remember when they said Saddam Hussain had "weapons of mass destruction" which was used to justify the Iraq invasion? Well there never were any. The Pentagon manufactured that disinformation, and media parroted it like loyal puppets.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nephs 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pentagon. The security agency of the country vetoing ceasefire agreement in the UN security council, in favour of Israel attacks.

Independently of whom, exactly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GiovaMC 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This reads like: "we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong"...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itscozydownhere 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean. Fuck both. But fuck Hamas more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is Islamic Jihad distinct from Hamas?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Yes, you can usually find it abbreviated as PIJ and supposedly has ties to Iran

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It is a different group. How much they align with each other and/or cooperate, I do not know.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JewGoblin 17 points 1 year ago

you mean the hospital parking lot?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The video seems pretty clear tbh. An aircraft dropping bombs would be quite loud, and a missile would be visible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Colin Powell has entered the chat.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't seen anything personally convincing, there's a photo of a pothole that's supposed to prove something I guess?

And the US government has a long and costly history of making up accusations against Arab Muslims.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

If anyone made it as far as the third sentence in the article, they might notice that "Islamic Jihad" in the title refers to "Palestinian Islamic Jihad".

They're not blaming Hamas for this incident. PIJ is a separate organisation.

load more comments
view more: next ›