I feel like this is a bad sign of things to come - like sooner rather than later, it’s going to be impossible to own physical copies of our media, and companies no longer want us to buy copies of things, just sign up for never-ending streaming services.
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
147 points (95.7% liked)
Games
16961 readers
495 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Call us and rent for life ..today!!
🏴☠️
Big doubt. Boutique Blurays are still very popular but sold themselves.
UHD Blu-rays still have value and relevance. This is unfortunate.
I'd say regular blu-rays are still relevant even. The jump in quality between regular blu rays to 4k ones just doesn't seem as substantial as the jump did between dvd and blu ray. or vhs and dvd. But maybe that is just my aging eyeballs that can barely tell the difference with this latest jump.
IMO, HDR makes a bigger difference than 1080 vs 4K.
I preach this to everyone. 4k doesn’t matter. HDR does. I haven’t seen any DV yet as I don’t have a DV tv
The picture quality isn't as noticeable to me as the additional HDR and spatial sound that tends to be included. Even with that, any Blu-ray is significantly better than streaming.
I love commentary and streaming services almost never have it. That's the biggest loss.
Does any streaming service, besides Disney, have commentary tracks?
TIL Disney+ has commentary tracks. That's neat.
Value for sure, but relevance? I challenge you to find one of your non tech obsessed friends (most of the population) that is still actively buying physical media or even still owns a disc player. I don't even think I've heard my friends say the word blu ray in years.
Depends on age I think. All my 40+ year old friends have large DVD collections, as well as some in their 30s. I could see people younger than 30 not giving a shit about physical media. Personally I would go physical over digital.
I had DVD collection but already don't watch or use/have a DVD player for longest time.(well I did have consoles that can play them. But I just never play them from disc.)
I just buy to support the film/anime/singer, download a high quality rip and play from my archive when I needed. (So if for any chance I got swatted I can show them I already bought the media already. I did the same for digital only purchase as well as I don't like streaming quality.)
Like does it makes a lot difference between UHD vs a proper high bit-rate encoded rip? In my experience, if you never pause and compare side by side stepping frame, you probably won't notice. (Yeah, bad encoding you can obviously notice, or some ultra wide with custom crop for easier encoding/smaller size).
I'm in the fairly niche group preferring digital ownership (although I also strongly feel we need legal revisions and consumer protections over things we digitally own, instead of the "well if this digital shop goes bankrupt, your stuff is just gone", DRM, HDCP hellscape, wild west we're in now) primarily because I'm against the huge amount of plastic and physical materials physical media creates. I am most heavily against the "subscribe to everything, give all the companies your money, and own NOTHING" extra super duper hellscape we're going towards now.
The parity of environmental impact of a physical disc versus streaming a movie is 4 play throughs. So, if you play your blu-ray / 4K disc 5 times, it is more environmentally conscious than streaming the movie from a data server.
Source: https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/05/discs-vs-data-are-we-helping-the-environment-by-streaming/
I think what they're talking about is buying online without physical media, but still owning what you bought, as in, the actual movie, as a file on your disk. Best of both worlds - no plastic, no servers necessary for playback after a one time download. That is how things should work.
I don't think that group is as 'niche' as it seems. People who prefer digital just go buy digital. It's harder to get nostalgic or evangelistic about digital goods, and the benefits are pretty obvious, so there's not much point in trying to convince people of it.
OTOH, physical goods do tend to elicit nostalgia and some of the benefits are definitely in the eye of the beholder. People tend to talk a lot more about preferring physical things, perhaps because they feel the need to defend their choice. There's often a lot of fear involved, like "What if they take my digital library away", etc.
Digital "ownership" is often cheaper, takes less space, and is more convenient. Occasionally something stupid happens, but in general it's pretty hard to lose your digital library.
And if you do lose it, I think most people would have no problem with using piracy to replace it. They bought it, and they deserve it.
I wonder if they sell fax machines.
Yup, about a dozen unique results in their app.
Their analytics staff: HOLY SHIT WE GOT A HIT ON 'FAX MACHINES' WE ARE GOING TO FINALLY UNLOAD THESE THINGS
an hour later
Analytics: they didn't actually purchase any
A lot of them are printer/scanner combo machines that have fax functionality, rather than a dedicated fax machine.
Which makes sense, I assume it's not that much more expensive to produce it with the required parts (if any). Rest is software
Fax machines are still very much used in the health industry (unfortunately)
I'm pretty sure Japan loves them too
And banking. I send at least ten faxes a day.
They do, many business still use and need them.
Zero businesses need them.
A few pretend to though.
If the hospital you send you employees to for workers comp says they want paperwork faxed, then you need a fax machine. Are there better ways to do it? Yea, but the hospital isn’t interested in that and you don’t get to argue so you have to use the fax like they said.
You misunderstand, it’s legislated. They have no say in this, and are just as pissed that they can’t email documents as you are.
Exactly, so fax machines are needed, as I said before
but the hospital isn’t interested in that
The phrasing implied something else entirely, just clarifying.
You could say that about any technology that isn't cutting edge. The problem is when something is still standard in a particular industry, then yes you do "need" them.
Ideally we'd switch to better methods, but it takes time and organized effort.
At this point the effort and time to keep physical fax machines is greater than dropping them.
A lot of fax machines are just integrated into a regular printer/scanner, which is why you can find them fairly easily
But yea a dedicated machine makes no sense now
With POTS lines getting up to $1000/month in some cases, it’s not even the equipment that’s the problem.
I was in the used video game store today and they had a huge bin of Blu-ray’s, including really good movies, for $3 each.
It’s dead
Boutique media distributors still exist for the limited audience still wanting physical media. For that I am grateful. Best Buy is cutting their losses, we live in a digital age, sad as it is for those who love collecting.
I'll be really bummed when the next gen game consoles are 100% digital and that be that for game collecting. Alas, nothing lasts forever.
They've been implementing this for the past 2 years. So stupid
Meh 🤷
Huh. Figured this happened years ago
What is the difference between the licensing agreement for physical media vs the one for buying digital media (not streaming, buying).
To which parties? There are different licenses involved depending on what you are referring to?
For instance the soundtrack licenses are different and the sales taxes are different.
The one where you buy a CD vs the one where you buy an MP3.
It depends on your local laws for physical media mostly, like old DVDs would say not for public event display including schools etc. but that was unenforceable muck.
But with digital media you could have access through a Service which requires adherence to the TOS
Nah. In the grand scheme of things it's the same licensing agreement, one which is still basically unchanged for physical media. They tried not too terribly hard to adapt it for digital media (mp3's, and video files) about 20 years ago now. And you still only own a license to enjoy that media in whatever form you paid to purchase it, for the term of that license. The TOS and all of that is extra stuff added by the platform but your license has nothing really to do with that. Which was my point. People like to pretend they own physical media because they feel like they do. But in fact they don't. They own a license to view or listen to it etc. The owner is always going to be the entity licensing it to you. And they absolutely could sue for it back and possibly even win the lawsuit. They won't, but they could.
If you purchase an MP3 from Amazon and then don't back it up to somewhere you have access to in the event that that media becomes unavailable on the platform that's on you. But the licensing agreement is basically the same.
view more: next ›