this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
146 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19232 readers
2358 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He knows she's not on trial, right?

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He also assailed James for the skyrocketing crime rates that have plagued New York City and the larger state during James’s tenure in office, as well as for having promoted a “Drag Story Hour read-a-thon.”

The horror!

Promoting tolerance and literacy? Who does she think she is?!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also worth noting crime is once again trending downwards.

[–] TechyDad 14 points 1 year ago

But according to my father (who watches FOX News), merely stepping in the borders of New York City gets one instantly mugged with a 50-50 chance of being killed. Surely, he's right and everyone i know in NYC who says that it's safe are really wrong!

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao. Hes gonna lose all his New York shit

[–] ThePantser 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can a person still be banished from a village? Like can he be banished from the state or NYC? That would be sweet.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The goal is to banish his businesses. Part of the sentence they're seeking is to make it impossible for him and his sons to own a business in New York State.

[–] TechyDad 10 points 1 year ago

As a New Yorker, I'll welcome him back on one condition. In fact, we can even have a parade welcoming him back if the condition is met.

That condition is that Trump is sentenced to a federal prison located in NY.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The saying, "the thief thinks everyone steals" applies here.

Everything he is accusing those aligned against his bullshit of is stuff he has done, or would do. He can't see the world in any other light.

[–] TechyDad 17 points 1 year ago

This applies to the "massive electoral fraud in 2020" claims also. Trump tried various methods to prevent a free and fair election. (For example, getting DeJoy to slow the post office down right when mail in ballots would be coming through.) Since he lost, he can't accept that it was simply more people voting for Biden/against Trump. No, instead it must have been that the Democrats somehow cheated more than he did.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He's is trying so hard to get a judge to slap a gag order on him so he can make the story about his free speech rights rather than his blatant and constant criminality.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

I think the only reason why one hasn't been put on him, is that all of the statements he's making are incriminating him further

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry Don. Letitia James is a prototype hard ass New York prosecutor. You ain't goin no where.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now I'm not saying correlation equals causation or anything, but it's curious that Don had been spending less time in NY and crime is dropping. That's all I'm saying, you draw your own conclusions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This trial is really amusing. Guess the two big things that have come to light is

  1. Trump's attorney never asked for a jury trial

  2. Trump himself will testify

[–] jordanlund 4 points 1 year ago

Never asked for a jury trial, and they insist on insulting the judge trying the case.

How do they think it's going to go?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

... as well as for having promoted a “Drag Story Hour read-a-thon.”

I have no idea what this is in reference to, but how dare they ... checks notes ... encourage reading??

Chutkan needs to rule on the gag order motion. Can she have such a motion apply to inflammatory statements about any case that Trump is currently involved in, or only the one in the DC Circuit?

[–] qantravon 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's one of the pet conservative conspiracy/culture war issues right now. They're claiming that drag performance is synonymous with burlesque or stripping, and thus having people in drag in the same zip code as minors is sexual abuse. It's part of their assault in trans rights, as they're equating drag with trans people, and saying that being trans is inherently sexual. It's all a load of bullshit.

[–] TechyDad 11 points 1 year ago

Exactly. What drag queen story hours is really: "A guy dressed as a princess reads a fairy tale book to little kids. The kids enjoy the 'princess' reading the story to them."

What conservatives imagine it to be: "A guy dressed as a woman does a strip tease while reading The Joy of Sex. Meanwhile, images from a XXX movie flash in the background as the kids' minds are warped."

[–] Treczoks 7 points 1 year ago

Encouraging people to read might make them smarter, which would lead to less votes for Republicans - therein lies the grave sin of reading!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are the odds this comes back to bite him in some way? This seems like a really stupid thing to be saying before court.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

His strategy has been consistent: treat all criminal investigations and prosecution against him as politically motivated harassment. Because that's how he uses the law. Then, after he found guilty, he claims political assassination to rile up his base and foment an uprising to free him.

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have no idea what this achieves. Like I said above, she's not the one on trial.

[–] tburkhol 12 points 1 year ago

It's for his disciples. All he needs to do is show them that she's imperfect, that she's "political," or that she's part of the Illuminati and, to them, the whole trial becomes invalid. It was already invalid because the prosecutors are oBviOuSLy political cronies of the Biden crime family, and having it tried before a political crackpot confirms that the whole legal system is just a Kangaroo Court of east coast elites.

[–] TechyDad 6 points 1 year ago

It serves a double purpose - neither of which are directly tied to this trial.

The first is to grift. "I'm being treated so horribly by the liberals because they know I'll stop them and make you fine MAGA folks rulers of this country. Now give me money!"

The second is to rile up his base to commit acts of violence. "This liberal prosecutor is unfairly coming after me. It sure would be convenient if someone did something to stop her!"

Of course, he won't care if the people who commit acts of violence for him get arrested. He'll use it to grift and incite more violence, but he wouldn't work to free those suckers.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I feel like he is completely incapable of understanding that he is now reaching the “find out” phase

[–] cabron_offsets 9 points 1 year ago

Lolbruh. Cry more, traitor shitcunt.