206
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
206 points (98.1% liked)
politics
19309 readers
3400 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not the "Tuberville Blockade". It's the "Conservative Blockade". They are all doing this. He is just the arrogant, grinning, evil face of it this time around. But they are ALL complicit.
This is not how the government should work. One person should not have enough power to obstruct anything. Whiners. That’s all Republicans are. They whine and cry and if they don’t get their way they just refuse to do their jobs. Pieces of shit all.
💀
Does he have the power all by himself? I couldn't find much information on exactly how he's blocking them. Is it a filibuster or something like it, where they could simply override him if 9 Republicans were willing to vote with the Democrats to end his block? Or is it something else where he truly, even if all the other senators disagreed, has this ability?
If it is something like a filibuster, then this isn't just him blocking promotions - it's the entire Republican side of the senate blocking promotions, with him as a figurehead.
From what I had read somewhere, the holdup is in batching a ton of the promotions into a single voting item. Batching them together requires a unanimous vote, so by voting against it, Tuberville gets to hold the entire process hostage. Promotions can still occur, but each promotion would likely take weeks or months of work and deliberations.
To add to that, Republican senate leadership could replace him on the Senate Committee on Armed Services with someone who would support these promotions. By not doing so, their leadership is showing support for him and his position.
Before military promotion and assignment was apolitical. As such, a mid to high level military commander could speak truth and not worry about civilian politics killing his career (military politics was and will always be there)
Now every ambitious major and colonel seeking a career has to factor in capital hill (and white house) whenever they speak at a meeting or hearing
Thanks Tuberville
Thank god we didn't do away with the filibuster.