We have re-invented trains for the 500th time. Good job world.
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
615 points (97.2% liked)
Fuck Cars
9440 readers
163 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What about trains underground?
Maybe even powered by electricity.
Is this "ThE lOop"?
Is that like crabification for vehicles?
But this time, it's different!
My trains have black jack and hookers.
But it's an even worse version because with it the traffic on rail networks would explode, the complexity of the unit that moves everything increases (as well as cost), and it pisses away all the efficiency trains get from economies of scale. A 2 mile train will always be more efficient than this crap. And that's all before you consider the safety nightmare that this would cause.
This is how you get the US to finally agree on a large scale train system: can them trucks.
Rail trucks.
Hell, they could probably get away with re-marketing ~~trains~~ rail trucks by talking about how much horsepower they have, how big they are, and how they can even pull other cars in a single line.
how they can even pull other ~~cars~~ trucks
Rail trucks that drive down rail roads.
Now we just need to wait for the Smart Rail Truck Convoy™
Just wait until they find out about the fancy air conditioned ones that can carry human cargo much faster than container cargo 😳
"this ~~dumbass~~ brave, smart, tech billionaire is upending ~~train~~ truck freight with this crazy ~~200 year old~~ new idea"
If you put a bunch of them together is that a road train on rails?
Truck platoons on rails. Sounds so cool. Fund it immediately.
We can optimize vertical synergies by putting the drivetrain into one car. I call it The Engine™.
Such a crazy idea for moving things around. I vote we call it the Locomotive^Tm
Sorry, our focus groups think "loco" has negative connotations
The us has a large scale train system (for freight.) the key will be to convince people who currently drive trucks (vehicles used to move freight) that trains are bigger and more phallic and thus a better method of compensation.
Doesn't the US already have a massive freight rail network though?
What if you link a whole bunch of them together, and then instead of having each cart be self propelled, you could have one car that pushes all of the linked cars at once? Sounds way more efficient to me. If only there was a name for a long chain of linked cars...
HyperRailTrackerCarGroup™
I am now taking on investors.
This guy is onto something!
From these comments it seemed like no one actually read what these are for? It actually makes a lot of sense to use existing, underutilized railway to deliver loads that would not require full train setups. This isn’t really a cars/trucks thing and I do blame Arstechnica for writing that shitty headline.
Yes, however, a lot of these rail lines have been needlessly abandoned and replaced with road shipping. Road shipping isn't really cheaper, they just get to put $10 of operational cost on the taxpayer for every $1 they spend. You're basically subsidizing artificially cheap shipping. Rail is the single most efficient means that we have of moving just about anything, but it's not as heavily taxpayer subsidized, and therefor not stonks. The correct answer would be to put those $10 of operational cost back on long and mid haul trucking companies and rebuild our freight rail networks, which, even without switching to electric trains, would significantly reduce emissions, make our roads safer, and drastically reduce long term maintenance costs on our highway infrastructure.
Road shipping isn't really cheaper, they just get to put $10 of operational cost on the taxpayer for every $1 they spend. You're basically subsidizing artificially cheap shipping.
Could you explain this? Is it because taxes pay for roads?
In a word, yes. Subsides to the tune of 100s of billions of dollars a year across the USA.
Like YIMBY said, the short answer is yes. The long answer is that there's a complicated network of subsidies, write-offs, and car-related maintenance, bureaucracy, and clean-up that is supported by the taxpayer and doesn't pay for itself. It's not just repaving roads, which has to happen more and more often as vehicles get heavier and faster (road damage increases quadratically as vehicle weight increases), it's also paying for highway patrol to enforce road safety, paying for first responders to clean up accidents, paying for other maintenance to prevent wildfires and clean up roadside litter (even if you use prison crews, it doesn't cost nothing), paying to maintain other road-related infrastructure like signs and guardrails, as well as the multitude of oil and gasoline subsidies that become more and more important as we become more and more reliant on tractor-trailers to haul goods.
The ten dollars spent by taxpayers for every one dollar of operational cost actually applies to driving cars, I suspect that the cost to taxpayers for long haul trucking is quite larger.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Not sure if you are saying that this is what we should be doing because that is what the article is suggesting. Using rail in a more efficient manner, not roads.
Of course not, they're just going to make twenty different posts talking about genitals, as if that's a priority for semi truck drivers.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Adam Something on YouTube:
It's like a train, but shittier, like a bus, but shittier, like a tram, but shittier...
I have nothing intelligent to add, but I just want to say that I sincerely hate cars. This sub isn't a joke to me, I wish those god damn things were never invented.
I'm tired of breathing their cancer-causing fumes, I'm tired of the honking and screeching, I'm tired of worrying I'll get run over just walking around my neighborhood, I'm tired of micro plastics in my brain because some fat asshole was too lazy to ride a bike, I'm tired of climate change threatening global stability. Sorry for the rant.
Very well said! No apology necessary.
Now stop me if you've heard this before, but what if... and this is just a thought, don't get too worked up... but what if instead of just one of those, we hooked a bunch of them together and pulled them with something?
I'm not sure we have the technology to achieve such greatness, but if we did, we could call it a TRAnsportation Innovation Network or TRAIN for short.
HOLY SHIT GIVE THIS GUY A CONTRACT!
In before someone in the US calls it CoMmUNiSm!
Preesh
This guy gets it.
America doesn't seem to want trains unless they're either cars or way too complicated.
It seems The Onion's article headline everytime there is a school shooting applies here, '"There's no way to prevent this!" says only country where this happens.'
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›