this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
426 points (96.3% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

4009 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (7 children)

How in the hell was anti-intellectualism ever framed as cool?

[–] Touching_Grass 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Almost every movie or show I've watched since I was a kid featured a cool shoot from the hip maverick that didn't have time to do that nerd shit like making ethical safe choices or pondering over the legitimacy of some grand conspiracy. They never needed too. They all live in a world where grand conspiracy's existed.

30 years later my generation grew up and have a lot of media stored right next to actual memories. So egg heads are evil spineless nerds that work for evil faceless organization. The real hero's are the guys that shoot first ask questions later.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Democracy. Everyone gets a vote, which leads people to think everyone's opinion is equal.

Insecurity. People don't like feeling shit about themselves. It's easier to find excuses to hate someone you suspect is better than you, than accept the sad truth that you're less than them. We're all narcissists to a degree.

A lot of people fluctuate between narcissism and self-loathing.

Vanity. It's the devil's favourite sin.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist 15 points 1 year ago

No democracy here.

Democracy would mean that Al Gore and Hillary Clinton won their elections Just because more people voted for them.

Republicans at every level of government get fewer votes yet hold more seats than Democrats.

That's not democracy, That's something else.

[–] darthelmet 22 points 1 year ago

Because generally the people with the money and power stand to lose by learning things they relied on for that money and power were bad.

[–] captainlezbian 11 points 1 year ago

It’s so much easier to sound completely sure of yourself and like you’re obviously right when you don’t know all the details. It’s profoundly easy to preach from mount stupid. Detail takes nuance, it comes with changing perspectives. It’s difficult and uncomfortable and requires humility. None of that is cool.

[–] pdxfed 6 points 1 year ago

When you only have a hammer ...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Ignorance is bliss. You can't be depressed about what you know you won't be able to or can't achieve if you don't know it. It's even better when you don't know that you don't know it.

Paint chip?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] marcos 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

When planes and distances get larger, hydrogen starts to make more and more sense. But I guess we won't get that far and planes will stay with biofuel and synfuel.

[–] postmateDumbass 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hydrogen doesn't have best track record with regard to aviation.

[–] marcos 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You mean the famous accident where the thing that was completely different from an airplane was full of hydrogen and burned down for reasons completely unrelated to that hydrogen?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jaydeep 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Electric airplanes are highly inefficient and not really good enough for commercial use.

[–] ABCDE 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s unlikely to change for long distance flights.

For short flights small electric planes are becoming viable already, and they will continue towards medium flights over time.

But theres no serious concepts for a battery that could compete for long flights.

That’s not to say that planes are doomed to be fossil dependent forever. But the likely solution will be a renewable high density fuel, possibly hydrogen or something easier to carry.

It’ll be less efficient than batteries on a energy in to work out basis, but once the cost of carrying the weight is considered, that will always swing way in the favour of high density fuels regardless of battery efficiency (for long distance).

[–] Fosheze 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Three words, nuclear powered aircraft. I see no way that could go wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly I wanna see the crazy logistics of using rocket fule, since it's just liquid oxygen and hydrogen with a water byproduct

[–] AA5B 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I doubt electric flight will ever be viable, but that’s because we should be using trains for short flights …. Says me from an urban area

Me who grew up rural near a small city says ….. what about connections from small city to an airport where I can go places?

Me from when I worked at an investment management company and saw people with more money than they knew what to do with says ….. I just need a quick hop down the Cape to my beach house (never mind that I was never one of those people)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The guy deleted his first tweet, but doubled down in his replies.

[–] Darkard 37 points 1 year ago

"people will always want to have a better society with less pollution so why even bother?"

What a knob

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/fossil-fuels-run/

In figure 1 [4] we show the future energy reserves in billions of oil equivalent, Btoe, as a function of year. While we obliviously use up fossil fuels without taking stock of about what future reserves look like, we should take note of the endpoints shown here. These endpoints are dangerously close: Since our society is so dependent on fossil fuels, it therefore is extremely important for us to know when these fuels will run out according to [4]:

Oil will end by 2052 – 30 years time

Gas will end by 2060 – 40 years time

Coal will last till 2090 – 70 years time

However, according to BP [5], earth has 53 years of oil reserves left at current rate of consumption.

[–] glimse 6 points 1 year ago

I came to the comments looking for a citation on the supply claim so thanks for the link!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Another thing to think of is what it will look like as people grab at those last remaining drops. We already see it in loosening of restrictions to allow fracking, and moving villages and farms to scrape coal out of weaker and weaker deposits. The costs (not paid) of gathering this fuel will only increase and it's already more than many are willing to tolerate, so the exact date of running out doesn't matter at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happens when we run out of fossil fuels? I understand fossil fuels are causing climate change/carbon issues. So why not just good riddance? Maybe I'm having a 'shower moment', but I think the change would force us to move to cleaner energy. Is there any intrinsic value to having pockets of sludge in the earth?

[–] jarfil 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What will happen, is 1000 more years of already changed climate, so that one's not going back all that easily.

Shutting down all fossil fuel use right now, would leave the world with a deficit of energy, meaning daily blackouts for starters, and a fleet of non-functioning cars, trucks, trains, ships, and planes, with some industries getting severely crippled (cement, steel, aluminum production, or anything using electroplating processes).

We're already being forced to move to cleaner energy sources, because the high quality carbon and oil deposits are already gone; what's left, is low quality stuff that's more expensive to extract and less energy efficient. So a switch to renewables and nuclear it is for the foreseeable future.

Is there any intrinsic value to having pockets of sludge in the earth?

Other than not having it floating all around... not really. It's likely going to get extracted until it stops being profitable, which is for a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate to spoil your fun, but these dates are always some what wanky. When my grandpa was in school, they told him that there ist still enough cpal for 40 years. When my dad whas in school tey told him that there is still enough coal for 50 Years. My elementry school teacher told me the same. If ypu look it up today, you will find that the coal reserves last for another 80 to 150 years. Resources dont run out. They get more expensive as the reserves dwindel leading to the developement of alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://feddit.uk/comment/2564489 Someone did look it up yesterday. We have approximately 70 years of coal left.

I don’t think anyone finds climate change/running out of fossils fuels “fun” so you’re not ruining anything.

[–] SendMePhotos 3 points 1 year ago

What will we use for lube?

[–] RIP_Cheems 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might I throw onto the table thorium power plants?

[–] AA5B 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can throw up all over the place for all the difference it makes. Sure, there are benefits that sound great, but the reality is they don’t exist. I think India has the biggest investment in trying to figure it out, but it’s not there yet and may never be

[–] RIP_Cheems 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean, thorium is far more common than uranium and require less processing to be used. Plus, it isn't always active like uranium, meaning it can be controlled a little better. It's worth looking into.

[–] AA5B 2 points 1 year ago

That’s exactly what I mean. There are benefits that sound great. However there’s not a practical reactor based on that, yet.

In some ways it seems like fusion. Every few years you see a flurry of headlines of how great it would be, and we’re only ten years away, but it hasn’t happened

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

good more of this everywhere all the time

load more comments
view more: next ›