datasheet for this part doesn’t have impedance-versus-frequency graphs
I don't get those companies. Do they expect to sell it as decorative pieces?
datasheet for this part doesn’t have impedance-versus-frequency graphs
I don't get those companies. Do they expect to sell it as decorative pieces?
Rar for Linux is something that exists, is free of charge, has no trial pop-up, and is basically the same thing that one runs for you. Also, 7-Zip can run it for you if you want to use a GUI.
But you need to install it.
you can obviously change the settings
And pray the settings don't change further.
Because they will. I have no idea why or when they do that, but those numbers will always corrupt, there was never an alternative.
Not a mistake, it's a memetic infection that goes from show to show every time they adapt that "decentralized consciousness" thing.
I wonder if they will extend citizenship to all the new areas they annex.
It is indeed a simple and very smart solution to the problem of illegal immigrants that the guy promised to solve in his campaign. I never expected smart solution from him in particular...
True that. The fish would vape.
I'm not sure China wants westerns using their internal propaganda app. Mixing the internal and external propaganda quickly leads to absurdities.
I'm divided between saying it's really great or that it should be a book and the man page should be something else.
Good thing man has search, bad thing a lot of people don't know about that.
Well, with the added detail that the censorship would only apply to Chinese people. You won't get a good real-world metaphor.
It's still quite messed up, and if ml mods dislike the other instances rules that much, they should just defederate them.
The "active" status.
Any project with it set is active, any project with it not set isn't. And you set them all to active when you create the toggle.
If the users complain, you make them tell you an specific rule that can you can use to auto-change a subset of the projects in a cron job. Expecting anything like this to have a complete objective definition is delusional.
Every time I see a "US eagle" with a speech balloon...
Well, when a bald eagle is depicted on TV, it's usually "dubbed" by a hawk. I'd recommend anybody to search what those eagles actually sound like, so you can laugh too.
Does it spark as much as a Star Trek high-tech panel?
If not, it's not futuristic enough.