this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
707 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19160 readers
5310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate 254 points 1 year ago (9 children)

So perfect that it happened when he was asked about running for reelection; the ads write themselves.

And before anyone condemns me for lack of empathy: the world would be a better place without McConnell in power. Also, fuck him.

[–] FlyingSquid 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder if he can even make it to the end of his term. He knows the Democratic governor of Kentucky will not appoint a Republican to replace him, so he's going to fight that.

[–] Zombiepirate 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh, I'd put money on them keeping him in a vegetative state if he croaks just to keep a Democrat out of power.

It would be the culmination of his life's work.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point, we're already witnessing the GOP version of "Weekend at Bernie's".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's funny how on certain topics (and to be clear, VERY few), the Dems and reps are the same. The Dems have feinstein who's in a similar state, and she's got people keeping her in office because they don't like who the governor is(n't) going to pick

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Feinstein is an order of magnitude more cognizant than McConnell, and yet a great many Dems want to see her removed also....and you just don't see that kind of parity with the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't go as far as to say the lady who tried to give a speech during a roll call vote, ceded power of attorney to her daughter and has to heavily rely on her staff to function is more mentally cognizant than the turtle by any stretch. He's struggling, but she's on another level.

But you're right, there's at least calls from the Dems to kick her out, so there is a decent difference between the two parties. I just wish the leadership felt the same way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

There's reports from colleagues that they need to repeatedly reintroduce themselves to her during the same meeting. She was completely unaware of her own months long absence from the capital.

There's definitely more Democrats calling for her retirement than GOP calling for McConnells (AFAIK there are zero), but saying she's an "order of magnitude more cognizant" is pretty damn generous

[–] minorninth 10 points 1 year ago

That’s ridiculous, Feinstein is clearly far more gone.

The issue isn’t her replacement, it’s that Dems would lose control of all of the committees she’s on.

I don’t believe for one second that Democrats and Republicans are the same or equally corrupt.

In this case, though, it does seem like they’re both playing the same stupid game due to their own seniority rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like they did with Strom Thurmond. Dude had to be wheeled onto the Senate floor and looked half dead by the end.

Part of the reason this happens is committee seniority is determined by length of time in the Senate, so to control committees it's important to keep Senators in office as long as possible for both parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think some people might read this comment and think you are describing some satirical hyperbolic scenario. But given what we have seen from conservatives over the last few years, It's not just possible, it's their normal.

[–] Zombiepirate 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, to be clear: I'm 1000% serious.

I expect the same for any of their SCROTUS justices who beef it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is insanity.

Under the amended law, the governor now may only choose from three names recommended by the executive committee of the outgoing senator's state party, and must make that selection within 21 days of receiving the list from the party.

With both of Kentucky's senators currently being Republican, the choosing of those three nominees would be up to the executive committee of the Republican Party of Kentucky, which is made up of 54 members.

After a vacancy is filled, there would be a special election with an open and bipartisan process — often referred to as a "jungle primary" — allowing any candidate gaining 1,000 signature to run. A candidate with more than 50% of the vote would win, but if no one wins a majority of the vote, the top two vote getters would go on to a runoff election in 70 days.

The timing of that election would be determined based on when the vacancy occurred.

If the vacancy occurred more than three months before a regularly scheduled election, that's when it would take place. It the vacancy occurred less than three months before an election and a regular election is scheduled the following year, the latter election date is when the vote for the Senate seat would occur.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter

He has an R next to his name. His own political ads could say "I'm too incapacitated to run and if you vote for me I will murder your family" and republicans will still vote for him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

That man has done massive damage to the country. He can’t expire fast enough for me.

[–] Daisyifyoudo 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To the contrary, I think you are displaying vast amounts of empathy by advocating for the betterment of humankind.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Our empathy is wasted on him and better spent on his multitude of victims.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I love when people try to pull the empathy card.

There are people on this planet who do not deserve empathy nor the benefit of the doubt. Corrupt politicians are some of those people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The world would be a better place if he choked on his own tongue while waiting for needed medical care like so many Americans that he helped keep from having healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Fuck McConnell. I hope his last years are equal to the horrible legacy he leaves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eran_morad 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Easily one of the most evil, destructive figures in the last 20 years of American history. May he get what he deserves.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've accepted this for so long as baseline knowledge that I've kind of forgotten some of the headlines. Can someone toss me a few bullet points of the bullshittery?

[–] eran_morad 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll assume you’re not a disingenuous republican. Off the top of my head:

  • Getting in the way of fucking everything Obama tried to do, including passing the ACA.
  • Disgustingly putting his thumb in the eye of everyone who voted for Obama by blocking Merrick Garland’s nomination to the now illegitimate and flagrantly corrupt supreme court (unworthy even of capital letters).
  • Unabashed support for putin’s agent in the white house. Up to and including voting to acquit during the impeachment hearings.

There’s more, but fuck it, I have a show to watch.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The "fun" part of his acquittal vote is that he said he was guilty, but since he had lost the election already, casting a guilty vote would be the wrong thing for the senate to do.

He wanted to both appease trump voters by voting not guilty, and appease saner moderates by calling him guilty in the press.

Just mealy mouthed all the way around.

[–] Dkarma 27 points 1 year ago

He proposed a bill and then when Obama backed it he voted against his own bill.

On another occasion he proposed a bill, and after it passed and the fallout was bad he blamed Obama for not stopping him from passing the bill.

Mostly he's changed the rules to benefit his party at the expense of the American people and / or democracy.

[–] Restaldt 11 points 1 year ago

He once filibustered his own bill because the democrats called his bluff and wouldve passed the bill

Dont remember what it was

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GrammatonCleric 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All my homies hate Bitch McConnell

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I know it's not nice to be piling onto an ailing old man who probably isn't going to be around much longer, but yeah when he was in good health he was an awful person who didn't give a single fuck about anyone else who was having a hard time, and had literally decades filled with opportunities to help people who were worse off and squandered them all just to accumulate more worthless power and money for himself.

Keeping him in power does nothing but harm other people and the country in general IMO, although to be fair that was also true before his health started to go south as well.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

He has destroyed so many lives, he deserves his destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DiagnosedADHD 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's honestly sad that these people would rather hold on to the little power they have than retire and spend the little time they have left with family.

[–] hogunner 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they truly cared about heir families they wouldn’t push so much disinformation and enact such horrible policies. These people only love power so you’re basically asking them to willingly give up the only thing they care about.

Evil bastards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anomalous_Llama 33 points 1 year ago

Goodness I hope it isn’t anything to minor.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Glitch McConnell

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Guess that long Covid is catching up. Adios Mitch.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Put him in an elderly home. I'd rather have a crack head off the streets make policy decisions instead of him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Surp 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Get rid of all politicians over the age of 55 or 60. Allow them to be maybe advisors but at this point these people have been unhelpful to the larger younger population.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Half-a-minute a second!? That's not good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cold_Brew_Enema 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Time to take the keys away, Mitchell. People with dementia shouldn't be driving

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This dude is going to end up dying of a stroke on camera isn't he.

Seems he's had several in the past few months already. Repeated events like this rarely end positively.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryrybang 12 points 1 year ago

Who is the handler in the video? She's more of an enabler.

She shares a ton of the blame.

We should write and call her because she's effectively serving as an unelected senior Senator now.

[–] millifoo 10 points 1 year ago

From now on, I'm calling this a Mitch Glitch.

load more comments
view more: next ›