this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1006 points (98.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

29555 readers
6757 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I work at like... 40% over the whole week? Thats what they pay for, so thats what they get.

[–] Rooty 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It is literally impossible to be 100% productive at work - even machines start to break down if they're constantly being run at full capacity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Design them to work up to 1500w and limit "100%" to 750w. Now you can always run at 100% just fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Gotcha, so when the boss tells me to "give 110%" I can go ahead and translate that to 55%.

And then not do that either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Exactly. I make sure I give a really good 30% or so on most days.

[–] menemen 4 points 5 hours ago

I get most of my work done on friday afternoons. It is also the only time of the week when I actually enjoy work. Finally I can relax, knowing the phone won't ring. (And I start feuds with anyone who calls me on my workphone on friday afternoons!).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

We need to normalize not just starting worker owned and run co-ops, but taking over businesses and converting them to these co-ops.

Federate the co-ops, establish a shared workforce (one co-op goes under/not enough business at x? Come work at y) and have them become actual workers councils

The Marxist critiques of this are not lost on me, co-ops are not immune to exploitation and fool proof by virtue of existing under capitalism but I think we need them for two reasons:

Sitting around and waiting for a revolution from a small group of people with one idea of how to run things is a bad idea

We need to practice what actual day to day life will look like. I think the experiences and connections made will far outweigh all of the bookclubs, protests and other purely political avenues of organizing

It doesn't need to be all central planning and state owned, it doesn't all have to be zaney pure communal experimentation right from the start ..people could just literally experience going to work at a normal job but feel the agency of having a say in their workplace, not live in fear of an overbearing boss, decide their wages, always have a place in case their job implodes or they become redundant (bounce to co-op y).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Sitting around and waiting for a revolution from a small group of people with one idea of how to run things is a bad idea

This is just a strawman of vanguardism . The bolshevik revolution was only possible with the overwhelming support of the peasants and proletariat class. A revolution is literally not possible without huge numbers of soldiers turning on the government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

What is the name for a strategy to cut out shareholders?

I imagine it's something like, we syrike and demand 60% of controlling shares or else company dies.

Price tanks, workers buy their own discounted shares.

5 years later do it again, seize 60% of the remainder.

Continue until shareholders are fully marginalized and financing is done through regular finite terms loans. Preferably from loans direct from the central bank at the policy rate.

[–] Maggoty 17 points 13 hours ago

I always give 100 percent of what I get paid. Minimum wage equals minimum effort.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

that's a lot of work on Wednesday

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

It's that one day with no meetings.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL 11 points 19 hours ago

Yeah it's Thursdays for me when I realize that I haven't done shit this week and need to crank out a bunch of stuff haha

[–] Tencho 1 points 17 hours ago

Its only 40s of work.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My dream is to start a co-op bicycle shop/worshop once I finish my mechanic traineeship. But the other trainees don't seem to share my vision, they only care about making lots of money…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I recently waxed the chain in my bike, can I join?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Good enough, you're hired!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

What are they thinking, owners make the most money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

I'll come help out at your bike shop.

[–] synapse1278 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be honest, with my current job, I would have a 4 days work week, it would change absolutely nothing. I wouldn't even have to work more on the other days.

[–] Kyouki 6 points 1 day ago

Wish this was acceptable to work as, I sit in the same position. I think I am averagely productive at only 23% of the days...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I work 4 10s with Wednesdays off. Deal.

[–] Brainsploosh 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, the counter-argument is that nothing is stopping you from creating such a co-op today. You not doing it is seen as a point in favor of capitalism/ruling class.

Show them wrong?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Funding is stopping me. Lack of investment money to get started. Access to capital.

I don't have the luxury to stop being an employee, even momentarily because I need the income

[–] [email protected] -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How many banks have rejected your business proposal?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You seem to not understand the difference between an investment and a loan

I have applied to a few accelerator programs and haven't gotten a response

One thing is to get money in exchange for ownership of the company and the other one is to get money that has to be paid back no matter what

[–] Brainsploosh -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Which is precisely the argument they give for why capitalists are needed, and thus warrant recompense (at the expense of the worker).

[–] SmilingSolaris 3 points 16 hours ago

That's not a natural outcome. That's an artificially created made up barrier. That does not justify capitalists. That shows how they have purposefully rigged the system to be reliant on them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've designed the system intentionally this way, to keep people dependant on them.

[–] Brainsploosh 5 points 23 hours ago

Agreed. It's very hard to beat the system from within. And their arguments only make sense within it.

Now if only there was a way to break the system... 🤔

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Systematically unfair system requires us to continue unchanged to the advantage of an incredibly small number dbags who own everything already, 'cuz they have all the money to invest'. Good critical thought dude.

[–] Brainsploosh 5 points 23 hours ago

Oh don't get me wrong, it's a thoroughly unjust system. That is just their argument for perpetuating it. (I could definitely have phrased it better)

And I also believe it's rigged.

Which means that the only way to win is to break the rules, or play a different game, which sounds more ominous than intended. But I do believe we need to do away with capitalism, or the very least capitalists. Either the $1 billion "you win" cap, or just a wholly different way of economic organisation. Other options are available, but few are as civil.

[–] El_Azulito 2 points 1 day ago

That hump day is real shit though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

count again