this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
180 points (98.9% liked)

politics

21868 readers
3980 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans in Congress will try to pass a stopgap spending bill this week to avert a partial government shutdown and keep the government running through September, though they’ll need Democrats' help to do it.

The 99-page stopgap spending bill, which House Republicans released over the weekend, is required since lawmakers haven’t made any progress conferencing the dozen annual government funding bills that were supposed to become law by Oct. 1.

The continuing resolution, the third since October, would fund the federal government for the rest of fiscal year 2025 — marking the first time since fiscal 2013 that Congress has leaned on stopgap spending bills for the entire year, according to a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Dems should shut it down ... but won't. They could force Republicans to sign whatever legislation they want, they just need 2 voted to win ... but the Dems are weak. We need a better class of liberal politicians.

[–] Placebonickname 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Democratic representatives make more money in donations when there are more Republicans around making noise …

We need to fix the way we donate money to candidates 

[–] Stovetop 29 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Honestly it should not even be legal to donate to politicians at all. There should only be publicly funded elections. Earn enough signatures to end up on a ballot, you get a budget that goes to helping you campaign, audited to ensure that it only gets used for purposes directly related to campaigning.

[–] Placebonickname 7 points 5 days ago

Well, all i am saying is that i can take a tax free gift of 100,000 USD per year, but i still have to inform the IRS who gave it to me and when. If I have to do that as a private citizen, politicians should have to do something similar with campaign donations, so i agree

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Yes, but ... the people that would make these changes are the ones that benefit from how they work now. We need another branch of government, one with no power over normal citizens, but able to investigate corruption in politicians.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sanctus 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Cap them at 2k. Best of luck.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grue 19 points 5 days ago (5 children)

We need a better class of liberal politicians.

That's called "leftist."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And when it's shut down, we should have a general strike. And the condition for ending the shutdown should be the immediate defunding and permanent removal of DOGE. And Trump should be made to wear a clown suit with a sign around his neck saying PUTIN'S BITCH.

(A boy can dream).

We need a better class of liberal politicians.

We need social democrats or people to the left of them. And most of all, people with backbone.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately, we have the results of "vote blue no matter who" instead.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The flip side is that if the Dems shut it down, the republicans will use that as a scapegoat for all their failures and, truth be damned, their base will eat it up. It's not an enviable position.

[–] Blue_Morpho 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Republicans have the majority. It's Republicans who are blocking the spending bill. This has nothing to do with Democrats other than attempt by the mainstream media to make it seem like it will be Democrats fault.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

If you’re fucked for agreeing, and equally fucked amongst the same populace for disagreeing, there’s not a lot of downsides going for the “shut it down” plan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I fully expect Dems to capitulate

[–] Pacattack57 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

100%. Even with everything going on they will bend the knee and give MAGAts what they ask for for the umpteenth time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"We got Collins to agree to maybe not do a genocide of all gay people! Democracy is saved! Collins knows that handshakes are sacred."

[–] Tillman 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That’s because 2/3 are in fact republicans in a thin veneer.

[–] Ensign_Crab 5 points 5 days ago
[–] HappySkullsplitter 58 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] pigup 8 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago

Absolutely no way it's gonna happen but the best play I could think of for this situation would be for Dems to not support it and then go on a social media tirade about how they did everything they could to stop a government shutdown. You know, do their best to make the other side look bad by slandering them with lies like how they wanted to cut all funding to public schools or something else ridiculous. Over 99% of people aren't gonna read the damn bill anyways and will probably take what is said at face value because of not reading it, as sad as it sounds.

Absolutely not gonna happen because the only US politician with any amount of spine I know of at this point is Bernie Sanders, but would be fun to see.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Democratic leadership is coming out swinging on this one, telling their caucus that any member of the party that attempts to block this bill will be primaried.

In these unprecedented times it is an absolute necessity that democrats join with republicans to ensure their agenda moves forward. Americans want a congress that works again. Any member that dares to hold this great nation hostage to score cheap political points will meet with the full fury of the DNC.

When asked if they were at all concerned about the policies they would be enabling they responded

Our donors don’t pay us to worry about policies. We will not be held hostage by small dollar donors any longer. The only thing more dangerous to our democracy than the specter of fascism would be us breaking a single norm or polite convention.

When told that trump recently threatened to round up democratic lawmakers and execute them for the good of the nation leadership had this to say.

While we certainly disagree with their plans, we will hold our heads up high knowing that we had the integrity to pass the spending necessary to keep the gears of government turning.

At that point democratic leadership had to leave with one senior leader saying “I need to get back to dialing for dollars” and another stating that they “had to pressure more members to censure Al Greene for his despicable display of barbarism, shouting out the president, is there no decency anymore”

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I hate that I genuinely can’t tell if this is satire or not. The quoted parts at least.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I was gonna put an /s on it but I thought it was more fun to leave it ambiguous.

The quotes are not real (except the “we won’t be held hostage by small dollar donors” is a paraphrasing of something that recently came out of some dnc think tank about what to do going forward)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Yea it was the “small dollar donors” part that threw me off.
Well done, you :)

[–] Tylerdurdon 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dude, I was so confused because I really wondered if theyf had capitulated that far backwards. The money part though, I started sniffing something funny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

They have. Just not as publicly as all this implies.

[–] Whirling_Ashandarei 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Fully had me in the first half

Also if you say this over in sh.it justworks politics you'll probably get banned, so this might just be early!

[–] makyo 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's because satire is well and truly dead

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Satire is alive and doing quite well. It has entirely usurped reality.

[–] DicJacobus 12 points 4 days ago

they'll get it.

Unlike the Republicans, the democrats have double digit numbers of people who will flip flop and cross the isle, even in a time like this.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Gee, what is the GOP offering for that Dem support?

[–] Nightwingdragon 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nothing that they're going to honor.

[–] jumperalex 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You know, I had a gut reaction to your post, "If it's in the law they have to honor it!"

But then I remembered what timeline we're in. The one where congress and the courts have abdicated themselves to the Executive Branch. The one where there is nothing to stop the Republicans in congress from making promises, putting them into the budget, Trump flatly denying it (aka Impoundment), and congress and the courts not pushing back.

It can 100% happen and we have the evidence and precedent now to prove it.

[–] Nightwingdragon 9 points 5 days ago

You know, I had a gut reaction to your post, “If it’s in the law they have to honor it!”

But then I remembered what timeline we’re in.

I've had to do this a lot. If I had a nickel for every time on Lemmy alone that I've had to argue with someone because they keep saying "Trump can't do that! There are laws against it!", refusing to understand that the very people responsible for enforcing those laws have been spending the past 6 weeks saying "Oh, yes. Yes he can."

Laws are irrelevant if there is nobody willing or able to enforce them.

[–] Ensign_Crab 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

They will cuz they suck. But they shouldn't.

Do to chump what the Repubs did to Obama. Go full Mitch McConnell. Stop everything you can. Help with absolutely nothing.

[–] psycho_driver 11 points 5 days ago

Shut the bitch down.

[–] ThePantser 8 points 5 days ago

Use the billions FElon saved! You don't need funding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Why should they?

[–] Today 5 points 5 days ago

Shut the bitch down!! We need to tank fast, clean house, and climb out!

load more comments
view more: next ›