this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
477 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20432 readers
3400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against "bureaucracy."

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Relevant bit from the article, because some of y'all apparently comment before reading:

The staffers who resigned were all originally employees of the United States Digital Service, a technology unit established during President Obama’s second term in 2014. The unit was renamed and reorganized in January via executive order by Trump into the Musk-headed DOGE.

[–] kreskin 2 points 2 hours ago

Putin will not be pleased.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Those are the ones you want to stay. They have ethics.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 hours ago

No, no, that's the point. This is a feature, not a bug.

[–] finitebanjo 12 points 6 hours ago

TBH it's interesting that there are always staffers available when the previous trump admin had staffers go very long times without a job as a result of their affiliations.

Working with the fascists is a huge negative on your resume, kids.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And 21 loyalists (yes, america, you're heading to monarchy) will be hired to fill those spots and nobody is left to resist.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They were doge staffers, wouldn't they already be loyalists? Edit: nvm, down the thread explanations that it was a department already that got converted to doge

[–] Bosht 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

HOLY SHIT HELL YES!! Finally someone with some backbone god damn. Best news I've heard in a month!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago

Propbably tired of getting cussed out and the partners leaving them.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

I am always confused why they don't just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren't paying attention...

[–] andros_rex 11 points 6 hours ago

One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago

That's the thing, though. They're not really taking risks.

Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can't be fired.

Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Sabatoge can carry extremely harsh legal penalties, particularly if it has any type of lasting impact. Beyond that, just phoning it in and doing a bad job can slow things down but doesn't actually stop it. If you're then let go it's on their pace, it looks worse for you and it's less noticeable.

A mass resignation can be the only thing some people can do. It sends a message, it gets noticed outside the organization, and it lets objective news reporting share your motivation, which would normally fall under opinion.
It also leaves a big gap in the organization that isn't getting anything done.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

but.. he who saves his country can not break the law. right??!

[–] FauxLiving 5 points 2 hours ago

Guys, dumping tea in the harbor is illegal, just pay your taxes to the crown. It's just a king, everyone has one

[–] ceenote 35 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Mostly the risk of jail, probably.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 10 points 14 hours ago

Or stochastic terrorism

[–] Jimmycakes -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Because they don't disagree with it, they only can't bring themselves to be the ones with the blood on their hands. Otherwise they don't care what happens.

[–] ripcord 2 points 8 hours ago

I know everything is bad now, but not everyone is bad all the time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

who did they submit their resignation? musk and trump can't lead so it's not them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Probably had to tweet a poop emoji at Musk.

[–] Nightwingdragon 37 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

I just want to know what these people were thinking when they took the jobs in the first place.

[–] orclev 133 points 15 hours ago

I think the ones resigning were part of the old department that Musk took over and converted into DOGE, so they didn't actually join DOGE originally.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They already worked there.

Musk took over the US digital Service and they were preexisting employees

[–] Serinus 5 points 10 hours ago

Well... one of the doges is the USDS skinsuit one. There's actually several iterations. And it's not clear Elon works for any of them?

https://nebula.tv/LegalEagle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Needed a job to pay that ridiculous rent, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

They probably thought they were actually gonna make shit more efficient.