Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
That's a stupid analysis, since it disregards the economic benefits of the programs that were cut. Based on that, 40% is a massive lowball estimate.
And Musk is transparent about attempting to eliminate any regulator that might cut into his profits by forcing him to make his products less lethal.
Cool story, bro 👍
Too bad it's irrelevant because saving money was never anything but a red herring in the first place. The purpose of DOGE is to purge the Federal government of relatively-impartial career bureaucratic and install MAGA loyalist stooges in their place. "Efficiency" has fuck-all to do with it, except in the sense of efficiently inflicting their extremist agenda on us all.
Wake me up when the AP quits naively pretending Musk is acting in good faith and starts doing its damn job.
Trust liberals to always treat fascists as if they’re acting in good faith, shutting down the left, and allowing fascism to grow.
It's also to perpetuate a lie that they saved so much money they can give the 1% huge tax cuts. Then when the bill comes due they'll have to cut Medicaid and ss.
I came here to say what you said, but you said it better. I'll just add...
Wake me up when the AP quits naively pretending Musk is acting in good faith and starts doing its damn job.
You're going to be sleeping a long time.
Well wake me up when the bs is over ig
Just goes to show how effective it is to repeat a lie so much that people start to accept it as fact. By continually calling DOGE a "cost-cutting" effort, they've completely framed the conversation how they want.
The goal is not to save money. It's to consolidate power in the executive.
And just coincidentally kneecap every department and service that was investigating elon or trump
a retired University of Baltimore law professor and expert on government contracting law. “Their terminating so many contracts pointlessly obviously doesn’t accomplish anything for saving money.”
it's hilarious how these high ranking highly educated experts are all completely baffled by everything the fascists are doing. when the actual objective of obliterating us democracy is complete, will they still be saying "butbutbutbut they said they were trying to save money!!!"
fucking come on.
fuck ap too. find someone to talk to who will address what these chucklefuck fascists are doing, rather than their 100% bullshit explanations for what they're doing
AP is big on both-sides and sanewashing. I guess that makes them "serious" journalists.
Where are you getting that he’s baffled? Elon says he’s saving us money, this guy points out that Elon is full of shit. Where is the confusion?
fuck ap too. find someone to talk to who will address what these chucklefuck fascists are doing, rather than their 100% bullshit explanations for what they're doing
Well some circles call this kind of non-biased reporting journalism.
Avoiding a direct statement of fact that contradicts known liars to appear non-biased is shitty journalism.
This shit is not "non-biased!" By taking Musk's claimed intent at face value even though the AP knows Project 2025 is a thing, they are blatantly spinning the coverage in the regime's favor.
What would actually be non-biased would be to accurately report what's actually happening, not to uncritically accept and repeat bald-faced lies!
They are trying to prove a point that there's no cost cutting actually happening.
Highlighting that Musk's own data, published by DOGE, says they aren't making any savings on almost half the cuts doesn't really seem very positive for the regime. It's also absolutely neutral reporting.
It is absolutely not neutral because it leaves out the important half of the story, which is that the whole exercise of publishing that data is nothing but a misdirection tactic. Again, we know this from Project 2025 and various public statements that had been made previously, so there's no excuse for the AP to be so excessively credulous that they mislead rather than inform.
The AP is parroting the Big Lie. It is absolutely biased and unacceptable!
I kept asking this question because I am familiar with contracts, and it made no sense.
Even if all the funds aren't fully obligated, you still have to settle with the contractor if you terminate a contract for convenience. They likely have supplies or comtract related overhead you need to pay for, so the savings will be minimal... Oh and in a lot of cases it means you have paid a bunch of money for no benefit if the project gets scrapped.
you still have to settle with the contractor
Yeah, that's not a thing that Trump does.
It will actually be fascinating if he just tells Musk to turn off payment somehow. Who would do business with the government at that point?
Wouldn't that put the government in default? And sink the US Dollar?
Cronies.
The art of the deal
It can officially be called DOGI now.
Attacking the USA was always the goal.
Attacking the USA was always the goal.
Hopefully the citizens of the USA actually do something to stop it.
We asked for this. It’s not like there was a bait and switch, they’re doing exactly what they said they would do before being elected.
Your "we" doesn't include me or anyone I know.
Dozens of them were for already-paid subscriptions to The Associated Press, Politico and other media services that the Republican administration said it would discontinue. Others were for research studies that have been awarded, training that has taken place, software that has been purchased and interns who have come and gone.
They turned off auto renew and deleted a few rows and columns from some spreadsheets. Top notch bussiness-ing there Elon.
Do the DMV! I want to go pay for my license and get out!
A quick DMV is why we have so many bad drivers.