this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
484 points (99.4% liked)

News

25272 readers
4286 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

On February 16, 2025, Washington state Judge Lauren King issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Trump's January 28 executive order that restricts transgender care for minors.

The judge ruled the order unconstitutional for overstepping presidential authority under separation of powers and violating the Equal Protection Clause.

The injunction follows lawsuits by Democratic attorneys general from Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota and temporary blocks in Baltimore.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 5 days ago (4 children)

These judges are working too slow, but that's the point of these processes.

But it's not like it's going to stop these right wing maniacs in USA to do anything different

[–] [email protected] 85 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So far, the legal system is the only part of government doing any substantial pushback at all.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Not quite... Remember when the legal system found Trump guilty of 34 felonies?

Yeah, he was not punished.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nah, don't count on that alone. At best, it's insufficient, and that would be without a Supreme Court run by batshit morons.

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's only a matter of time before judges start falling out of windows. That's the next step.

[–] jaybone 6 points 4 days ago

“Presidential act” “not illegal”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Yeah they’ve sent a few strongly worded letters.

[–] foggy 40 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Government is a lumbering giant.

Every president has failed to implement their vision. That's the point.

What's going on right now is unprecedented, but Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

It's just going to fuck up our standing in the world of geopolitics, which will have long lasting consequences.

I hope I'm right, because I sincerely doubt it goes any better than that.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago

It's just going to fuck up our standing in the world of geopolitics

It already has.

Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

I hope you're correct, but we can't rely on that.

Individuals have to also take action, and keep pressure on the people who are supposed to be preventing these abuses.

[–] JWBananas 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's going on right now is unprecedented, but Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

The Republicans will look at what they have done and institute broad limitations on executive power on their way out the door (assuming we don't just end up with martial law). This will prevent Democrats from ever attempting anything even remotely similar. But there is always the ever-so-slight chance that it nerfs Republicans down the road too.

Maybe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That assumes they still have the house and senate in 2028. If they're going to do that they'll do it before the midterms. Their majorities in both houses are razer thin, and the incumbent party almost always loses ground in the midterms. Trump wont allow them to hamstring them for his final two years in office

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts 7 points 5 days ago

There are no safety nets and guard rails anymore. It will be raining judges out the windows soon and that's your sign that it's totally over.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

ImPeAcH tEh JuDgEs 4 TrEaSoN !!!
--maga

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 4 days ago

The legal system never gets you your remedy when you need it. It's slow.

[–] 2pt_perversion 58 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Going to be interesting watching the courts this year. Congress ain't doin shit but maybe the judicial branch wants to try and keep some power for themselves and congress instead of being a complete rubber stamp. Also if they rubber stamp some of the clearly unconstitutional stuff we might be looking at possible secession and civil war. Then again if they don't rubber stamp and Trump ignores their rulings we might be looking at civil war too.

It really sucks to live in interesting times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump is such a moron, and this is what the American people voted for. It's also going to affect the rest of the world.

Absolute insanity.

[–] MattTheProgrammer 1 points 3 days ago

I don't think the American people voted for this. I think Elon paid to have the election hacked.

[–] Sterile_Technique 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unless the judge is literally beating him with a book titled "Legal Setback" in a fatal manner, her efforts aren't going to do shit. Legal action against a man who's above the law is like spitting on a fish.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A president has immunity, but people implementing everyday life tend to follow court orders if they contradict presidential decrees.

If they consult a lawyer, nearly every lawyer will advise to follow court orders. If they don't, a court can order other authorities to enforce its decision with force, fines or jail time. Lay people don't have diplomatic immunity.

Now if cops won't enforce court orders, then yes... then I hope you're all stocked up on batteries, brushless motors and flight controller stacks. But I hope that won't happen.

[–] Eheran 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So? He can just pardon them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To my understanding, you cannot pardon someone whom a court fines or detains to force their compliance with their ruling in another case.

(It would be better if a lawyer answered that.)

[–] zergtoshi 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why cling to the 2nd amendmend of the constitution and not make use of the means?

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Highlights by me.
Instructions unclear?

[–] ComicalMayhem 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doing that means throwing everything away. Even if someone survives after starting a firefight, chances are they'll get caught and imprisoned for life. It takes a lot of courage and commitment to do something on that degree, I find it understandable why people are a little hesitant.

That said, Luigi did it. So can we.

[–] zergtoshi 2 points 3 days ago

Sadly it's a prime example for the paradox of tolerance and sooner or later people will act accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that has crossed the minds of a lot of people in the last several months, mine included

[–] zergtoshi 1 points 3 days ago

I'm a very peace loving person, but I understand that having peace is only possible if all involved parties keep peace; only one party or some parties keeping peace while others wage war is in the end no peace at all.

[–] breadsmasher 15 points 5 days ago

the constitution? republicans just threw that out the moment they had control

[–] fediverse_fremont 6 points 4 days ago

i never trusted the legal system anyway the only difference between a corrupt judge and a good one is how they rule on your case anyway

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

preliminary

I knew this word would appear. Either that or “temporary”.

[–] snekerpimp 2 points 5 days ago

Why does this matter? The entire executive branch has said they will ignore the courts and that the courts have no power over them, cause 😝. Unless someone IN the executive branch enforces anything, it’s all just hot air blowing in the wind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Mais le roi, c'est moi!