this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
89 points (94.1% liked)

politics

20016 readers
4422 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration continued its head-scratching appointments by anointing billionaire Linda McMahon as Secretary of Education...

But then – surprise! – the deputy education secretary spot went to Penny Schwinn, who is far more famous to the likes of us education writers. Schwinn’s deep, impressive bona fides include becoming a teacher through Teach for America, followed by service as a classroom history teacher, school principal and then a swift ride up high-level administrative posts in various states including Texas. In 2019, at 43, she became Tennessee’s Commissioner of Education.

In Education Next’s extended interview, Schwinn emphasizes that educators must aim every single decision not merely toward achievement, but toward the best interests of kids. This “North Star” helps her to sift through irrelevant political chaff so she can stay with her agenda even in the face of constant opposition.

“That is always going to be personal and emotional; however, we must find a way to engage in hard conversations without taking them personally,” she said.

...Schwinn doesn’t seem like the kind of woman to put her North Star away, so she must have been convinced she could do real work.

Of course, we’ll see. The best interests of the kids could use a true champion. Good luck, Deputy.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Placebonickname 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hearing that the “The gop nomination is totally qualified…” makes me think that there’s either a misprint or they’re up to something nefarious…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I dove a bit into the nominations a while ago. Many are qualified, but the ones that aren't are impressively unqualified.

[–] aviationeast 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do they have a secretary of education if their is no department of education?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

So people will learn what the Trump administration is all about!

[–] raynethackery 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think being Tennessee's Commissioner of Education is the flex this writer thinks it is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Schwinn’s biggest claim to fame was an all-hands-on-deck initiative designed to shift reading instruction from the terrible 3-cueing system that teaches kids to guess words, to one that is science-based.

I listened to the Educate podcast from APM Reports. They did tons of stories on learning to read, the bad teaching, the good teaching, it was heartbreaking because of shit like this. The cueing system didn't teach kids to sound out words. It taught them to guess at words based on context. The specific example they gave was that the illustration and the words around the one you didn't know might make you guess "horse" when really it was "donkey."

I'm an avid reader and fan of education. This lady sounds like she knows her stuff. I'm pretty shocked, given all the other appointments. I'm full of dread about what might come next, but tepidly appreciate her appointment.

[–] gAlienLifeform 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering this is an opinion piece from an author who spends most of her time writing about how she thinks teachers unions make it impossible to provide good education to kids I think this is probably just another right wing attempt attack democracy by screaming "think of the children"

[–] reddig33 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Either way, the cueing system is nonsense.

[–] gAlienLifeform 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Either way, Republicans being in control of education policy is nonsense. It's not going to matter what reading system they use if they're trying to teach a trans student ~~whose~~ who's being harassed by their state's laws, or a student who is distracted by reasonable fears of being shot, or by hunger because they don't have any food at home. This person could be the most skilled and impassioned champion of education ever but she's never going to be able to help kids Republicans decide are unworthy working for this administration.

e; autocorrect being unhelpdul

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Any thoughts on this? I don't know her, other than what's in the article. And I'm not familiar with the structure of the DOE. Will she, as deputy secretary, be able to do anything to stop them from shutting down the department?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am not American, but I have lived in North America, Europe and Asia.

Typically when a new oligarch gang takes over, their priority is providing benefits to themselves and their senior affiliates. Everything else is cover for the plebs.

It is very likely Schwinn is more of a PR move to provide rhetorical cover for their criminal activities. Schwinn is either in on the scheme and was paid off or is dumb enough to think she can change the system from within or that American institutions will magically resolve everything.

Don't hope for magical solutions.

Strong democratic institutions are good and all, but they have a tendency to fail exactly at the moment that you need them most. And when democratic institutions do fail, the cost (and sacrifice/risk) to return to normalcy increases exponentially.

[–] Hoomod 4 points 1 day ago

Since they're trying to remove the Department of Education, this makes sense, as it will make her role totally pointless

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

This is what I'm afraid of.

[–] Donebrach 4 points 1 day ago

this is not a piece of journalism, this is a clearly labeled commentary piece by a who-the-fuck-knows. its likely completely made up propaganda.

[–] MolecularCactus1324 5 points 1 day ago

Uplifting news