this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
291 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19839 readers
3669 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Can we get a law in place that says if you have to sue the government to stop some obvious bullshit, that you recover your legal fees?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago) (1 children)

Laws only matter if the government wants them to matter.

[–] Warl0k3 1 points 1 hour ago

Sovereign Immunity is a fucker of a concept.

[–] FabledAepitaph 8 points 4 hours ago

Thats fine, I'm just as happy being fully "anti-religon" for equality.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 15 points 5 hours ago

Jesus is pretty cool. You show me a christian who follows jesus' teachings, and I'll have mad respect. You give me some dipshit doing the most anti-christlike shit imaginable, but with crosses all around, and I'll make fun of him forever. Just a way of un-tarnishing the brand.

[–] jaybone 16 points 7 hours ago

How many EOs does this dickhead have now in these two weeks alone?

How many does a normal president have in a full four year term?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

In truth it was very challenging to stay calm in the face of someone saying something so blatantly biased and false. Packaged as an opinion, of course, but presented as the truth.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made, but I know for a fact that the only thing I accomplished is that she's unlikely to make that particular statement in front of me again. No minds were changed that day. It's just sad.

As someone who actually IS persecuted in this country for things I cannot change about myself, I really don't get why someone would want to live under the delusion that they are being persecuted when they otherwise aren't. It's not fun and there's no benefit to being persecuted.

[–] CharlesDarwin 43 points 8 hours ago

And by that, they mean something like this? Xtians get all kinds of privileges and everyone else has to convert or be a second class citizen?

[–] qantravon 27 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They want to be David vs Goliath. Being the ones persecuted means that they can go on the offensive without feeling bad about it. It means whatever they do is justified as being a means of survival. It gives them an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, the Bible is written for the underdog. Constantly referencing persecution for the faith, which is non-existent in the USA, so they try to redefine what they see as micro aggressions as full on persecution. They simply want to be angry, righteous anger for Christ.

[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 8 hours ago

They view their Belief System (BS) being put on the same plane as other mythologies, new or ancient, as somehow being "persecuted", since they are so used to having unwarranted privileges.

They've seen that unwarranted privilege being chipped away, ever so slowly, as xtianity dies off in number of adherents in the United States (dwindling down to 60-some percent, now) - trending toward what more normal advanced countries of the West are like, and they fucking hate it. They want everyone and every part of the culture to have them up on a pedestal again, even if it means violence, and a lot of it, because "Jesus".

[–] partial_accumen 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made

I imagine some of those questions included:

  1. How many christians in the USA were killed in the last 20 years only because they were christian?
  2. When was the last time a gathering of christians in a public library doing things unrelated to being christian forced to cease and desist?
  3. Is it common in society for a young adult living with parents to profess their love for christ and be thrown out of their homes and essentially abandoned by the family?
  4. Is there a history in this country to regularly arrest and prosecute christians for gathering or holding ceremonies like communion?

edit: A couple more additions.

  1. Has marriage between two christians been illegal for nearly the entirety of the existence of the USA?

  2. Are there camps that some misguided parents send their children to to be "deprogrammed" from being christian?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Scabz 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They're gearing up to roll out project 2025.

[–] grue 31 points 7 hours ago

They're not "gearing up;" it's steamrolling us as we speak.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It ain't gonna be bloodless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Nope. Not at all, not even a little.

[–] [email protected] 177 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No freedom of religion without freedom FROM religion.

Resist a theocratic state.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

"The First Amendment clearly says "Congress shall make no law" and this is an executive order. Seems constitutional to us"

Supreme Court (probably)

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 hours ago

Jesus fuck I hate how plausible this is.

[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 7 hours ago

"I mean, there is no mention of the character of Jesus or their precious favorite book in the Constitution, and it's only the very First Amendment and all....and founders like Jefferson were QUITE CLEAR about their skepticism of xtianity's claims, but if you are True Originalists like we are, you'd understand how this is supposed to be a xtian nation!"

Also SCOTUS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 7112 125 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

DEI but just for Christians

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

be explicit: white Christians

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

White christian males with money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There's a group of people that go around in white sheets with pointy hats and they burn crosses, often on other peoples property. That seems pretty anti-christian to me and should be the first to be investigated.

[–] just_another_person 48 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Everything about the GOP as very anti-christian. Jesus was a bleeding heart socialist by today's standards. I'm not sure what books these fools have been reading that says otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I am entirely serious when I say this:

The latest meme/talking point working its way through all the newer, e-celeb type american christian pastors, the ones that are extreme but not quite as bonkers as the qanon, I-am-a-prophet types...

The latest sermon topic is 'the sin of empathy'.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=GFOMXXDlBTw

[–] just_another_person 3 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

they don't read. their megachurch pastors tell them what the bible says about who to hate. they draw all their rhetoric from Leviticus and Numbers to justify their gross misinterpretation of Revelations. they ignore the gospels entirely. here are the things you need to know when dealing with christofascist propaganda

  1. the old testament comes from the living documents of the jewish faith maintaining the history of their ancestors and people. the jewish faith is largely an ongoing conversation about what it means to inherit this story and how to resist oppression by enacting boycotts, strikes, and maintaining the cultural heritage of foods. no one thinks everything in it is right and good except for some folks who worship orthodox hegemony beyond all else
  2. the teachings of jesus are primarily about how orthodox hegemony is bad and that the true value of ethics and morality is to help others and strengthen communities where you are
  3. the book of revelations is early christians' attempt to document the events of a genocide enacted by an authoritarian who co-opted the trappings of religion. it's a warning against the types of coagulation of power being enacted by donald trump literally right now. they are the followers of the antichrist they accuse woke folk of being. woke folk are who get raptured into the eternal song of historical memory by remaining true to the teachings that kindness and grace is more important than orthodoxy. the book is all florid and weird because the roman censors didn't recognize it for what it was, so it was able to survive.
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 15 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

And by "anti-xtian bias" he means, not properly privileging xtianity.

That's what these assholes complaining about xtian "persecution" ALWAYS mean. They hate to be ignored, too. Being told that their rules are FOR THEM and not anyone else in their book club, it absolutely infuriates them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 62 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

the task force will work to fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society

Yeah, Democrats did this already. They're called Hate Crimes and it's the law. Not a measley little EO.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You don’t understand yet. The words are a cover for their real intentions which are to go after the enemies of Christianity under the guise of investigating hate crimes.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, nothing they say is what they really mean. Welcome to the last 40 or so years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

"moRE Of tHe SAmE" parrots the fool as the country falls.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago

No no but hate crimes are DEI bad word and also only happen to brown people, who deserve it!!!1!1!

[–] [email protected] 50 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Good thing I'm not biased against Christians specifically. Fuck all religions equally - fair and balanced.

[–] AbidanYre 42 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Every time I read something he said it hurts my brain. Everything about his speech patterns is so fucking stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't this still require specific existing laws (as in actual statutes) to charge someone with violating? Or can they just charge and convict on arbitrary things they don't like, now?

[–] FlexibleToast 5 points 6 hours ago

The thing with Trump is, he doesn't care. He will do whatever he can until he's told he can't. So, until this gets challenged and makes its way through the courts, he will do it. So much of our system is built on "norms" that he can get away with doing things that seem like they shouldn't be allowed. Until democrats start doing the same, they'll keep losing for failing to do what the people want.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I mean he can sign it, it’s going literally nowhere. But if this ain’t proof that there’s a genuine desire to install a theocracy in the US, then I don’t know what will convince anyone.

The fact that a President even suggests this is a clear tell that some want the US being Iran but with Jesus.

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, a depressing amount of Americans believe this country was founded as a xtian one. 60%

https://apnews.com/article/american-founders-christian-nation-conservative-beliefs-4ea388e8d80c54016a6a4460cbef9b82

Six in 10 U.S. adults said the founders intended America to be a Christian nation, according to a 2022 Pew Research Center survey. About 45% said the U.S. should be a Christian nation. Four in five white evangelical Protestants agreed with each assertion.

Which is just flat wrong, of course, and doesn't really need any debate: it just was not founded as a xtian nation, and that was quite intentional. But that's the level of stupidity we are dealing with.

And something like 45% of the country WANT this country to be a xtian nation, which is also depressing.

[–] grue 6 points 7 hours ago

Half the founding fathers were closet atheists using 'Deism' as a fig leaf.

[–] Nightwingdragon 35 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean he can sign it, it’s going literally nowhere.

This is incorrect. He can sign it, and Bondi will start bringing these cases to court. One would think that it would immediately stop there as the first judge she argues in front of dismisses the case for being blatantly unconstitutional and having her brought up on sanctions for multiple blatant violations of the defendant's constitutional rights.

But in this court system? I wouldn't be so sure. At the very least, I expect at least some people to get caught up in this dragnet and have their lives upended for years until the Supreme Court finally stops dragging their feet. But given this administration, this Supreme Court, and the number of MAGA judges that Trump can forum shop through, there is a non-zero chance this actually succeeds.

It wouldn't be the first time this administration and SCOTUS hand-waves away constitutional protections.

[–] benignintervention 19 points 10 hours ago

Keep in mind that they also broke into the Treasury system and own the paychecks of every federal employee. If that's not leverage, I don't know what is

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

As a reminder: The guy defending Christianity is a rapist and adulterer who set free 1500 criminals, including pedophiles and child rapists.

If Jesus was real, he would bitch slap Trump so hard it would take the paint off his face!

load more comments
view more: next ›