this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
213 points (94.9% liked)

Europe

1986 readers
2296 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

In an interview with Fox News Sunday, J.D. Vance that “it is possible” that the United States will take over Greenland.

At the same time, Donald Trump's vice president is lashing out at Denmark.

“There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about Greenland. This is really important for our national security.”

“There are seaways that the Chinese and Russians use, and frankly, Denmark, which controls Greenland, does not do its job. It's not a good ally," J.D. Vance for Fox News.

“So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to take more territorial interests in Greenland, that’s what President Trump will do, because he doesn’t care what the Europeans are crying out to us. He cares to put the interests of the American people first," J.D. continues. Vance.

The vice president of the United States also highlights another point that “people are not aware of.”

“There are probably 55,000 people living in Greenland who are not actually happy with the Danish government,” J.D. Vance.

“They have great natural resources there, they have an incredibly rich country that the Danes don’t let them develop and explore.”

"Donald Trump, of course, would have a different approach if he was Greenland's leader," the vice president said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The words "piss-stained lying sack of shit" are thrown around a lot these days.

[–] NoSpotOfGround 2 points 55 minutes ago

...in some cases with an abundance of merit.

[–] booganiganie 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WrenFeathers 5 points 7 hours ago

A weasel that likes hiding in couches.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What happens if a NATO member invades another NATO members territory?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Technically “an attack on one is an attack on all” would apply still, since the us would be attacking. Though I doubt the actual agreements are written so simply.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 1 points 8 hours ago

I think the closest thing to an example we have is the direct conflict between Turkey and Greece, though that occured over Cyprus which isn't NATO territory.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Day one: Greenland loses universal healthcare and their entire social safety net.

You would have to be dumber than a republican to be a Greenlander who supports United States taking over.

[–] Evotech 1 points 9 hours ago

And all 55.000 are sent to the mines

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

What does the bit about the sea lanes even mean? What does he think the Danish are supposed to be doing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Violate UNCLOS obviously.

[–] Evrala 2 points 11 hours ago

As global warming increases the waters around Greenland will become more important strategically.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

Bro, in the US-Denmark relationship, you're saying WITH A STRAIGHT FACE that DENMARK is the problematic one? Bro.

[–] x00z 16 points 16 hours ago

God, these fucking American politicians are the definition of vomit.

Fuckoff Vance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Annexing land for mineral/energy interests, claimed as a security concern... I guess Putin is so far up Trump's ass we can hear him speaking now.

[–] DarkFuture 13 points 18 hours ago

As an American citizen I can say that this dipshit freak only speaks for the dumbest among us. This guy's daddy is going to make America lose all its allies. So I don't think this loser should be talking about this subject.

[–] bitchkat 5 points 16 hours ago

So, just because some residents aren't happy with Denmark, that means they would be happy with the USA? Lol.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus that’s some scary dictator / aggressor ready talk, holy crap.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We're either going to see the EU/NATO lay flat while USA takes territory, or we're going to see USA annex and invade EU territory and be met with war.

Probably the former, but it won't be good.

Vance is also intentionally ignoring the fact that 85% of Greenlanders were negative to Americans seizing their country. He throws out the unhappy 55,000 Greenlanders speculation as if they haven't already been asked about the situation directly. He does not care what the Greenlanders think, he just wants to seize Greenland.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does 24 points 1 day ago

It's the same rhetoric that Russia has used to annex land. "They aren't happy, the people voted and supported us" and "they have always been Russian, the land was Russia's historically. We are just taking our land back"

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 13 points 1 day ago

Honestly I hope we'll see neither of those scenarios but in the hypothetical event of a US invasion, the EU project would fall apart if it wasn't met with a direct answer.

[–] njm1314 6 points 18 hours ago

Oh yeah, forgot about this guy. As did everybody else.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about America. They're currently making a lot of unwise economic decisions and destabilizing the world. They're not a good ally.

So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to invade the USA, that’s what [insert country here] should do. (Plus we can take their resources.)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago

"There are probably 330,000,000 people living in The United States who are not actually happy with the American government,” J.D. Vance fails to admit.

[–] captainlezbian 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd love to be liberated by Denmark

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Not the worst choice. They're the second-happiest country in the world. They have freedom, look down on bigotry. They have nice pastry...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The second the US attempts to take Greenland we’ll be sanctioned to oblivion by the treaty we helped create. It’s beyond humiliating, but absolutely necessary.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I certainly hope this is just big talk of a delusional megalomaniac who wants to be emperor and some vice president with an intellectual impairment chiming in to either please him and lick boots, or because this is some elaborate strategy to spread fear and ask way too much, and then get a better "compromise". But yeah, sad to see the civilized world becoming smaller. I hope we stay strong, don't give in and in the end the good will prevail. We're going to find out either way.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He keeps saying that USA has an interest in it because they have an interest in it.

There's no reasoning except for daddy Trump saying he wants it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Redex68 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the Danes don’t let them develop and explore

Lmao, it's not the Danes that aren't letting the resources be explored, it's the Greenlanders themselves

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yup. Rare earth minerals are profitable, but ecologically apocalyptic. They don't want their island to become an ecological disaster zone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

They're not even profitable currently, given the arctic conditions. Greenland has been begging for outside investment for a decade, but it's just not viable.

Ironically, the Danish state might have wanted to invest, but are bound by a clause in out cooperation agreement (Selvstyreloven) which forbids Denmark from investing more in Greenland than they did when the agreement was signed in 2009. This clause was insisted on by the Greenlandic parliament, as they wanted to bind themselves to move more towards independence than cooperation with Denmark, but it's been a real problem when it comes to developing Greenland.

Like, the trouble Denmark had to go to in order to build an more modern airport on Greenland....

If we come away from this with our relationship intact (Greenland & Denmark), the Selvstyrelov needs to be renegotiated to allow more Danish investment into Greenlandic infrastructure and business.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The amount of FUD is insane and I’m afraid people are gonna eat it all right up!

https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-majority-of-greenlanders-reject-trump

Only 6 percent of Greenlanders want to leave the Danish Realm in favour of the US, and 9 percent are undecided.

The US can just build more bases in Greenland, instead of closing them down. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_Base

I don’t think this is about national security. This is about exploiting the natural resources in Greenland.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 64 points 1 day ago

It's fascist imperialism, because the US is a fascist dictatorship now, and should be treated as such.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

This is not about natural resources or national security, but Russian influence in the US government, and trying to normalize imperialism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Always has been, also for Denmark

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Sit down, Polievre.

[–] adam_y 35 points 1 day ago

They are not doing their country right, so we have to take it over and fix it, says nation where eggs are prohibitively expensive.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

O no the 55k people not happy. How about the tens of millions in murica that are not happy or can Canada start taking those northern states?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

Kid that wants to take everyone else's toys, after being told no by a grown-up: "I hate you! You're not my friend anymore!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Denmark might not be a good ally to the US in Mr Vance's bigoted little mind, but for what the US are to Denmark and Greenland, there is a far better term describing a state that wants to annex another state's territory: Enemy.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

As an European citizen, I prefer having Danish people as friend than US ones right now (and maybe for the next 4 years)... Reliable friends are always better than unreliable ones...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

And this should explain very well, what the US understands to be an "ally".

[–] captainlezbian 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shut up Vance. Nobody cares what the vice says.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›