this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
425 points (98.2% liked)

politics

21036 readers
4740 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anti-intellectual might be the kindest and least offensive adjective to describe him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Anti-intellectual in much the same way as anti-matter

[–] xenomor 67 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every time I look at this dude, he looks like five giant cockroaches scrambling around inside a human suit.

[–] goodthanks 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So that worm in his brain might just have Cordyceps…cool cool. Stocking up on tape, vitamins, paper, scissors, and alcohol asap.

[–] goodthanks 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] goodthanks 8 points 1 month ago

Do do doo do doo doo.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sounds like he's on death's door when he speaks too. Or he's already dead and the roaches are good ventriloquists/puppeteers.

[–] MrFappy 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d assume the latter at this point. Although it’s not cockroaches, it’s fucking worms.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] goodthanks 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought it sounded strange when he spoke as well. Turns out he has some condition which makes it sound like that, so maybe we shouldn't point it out.

Or maybe we should - the right has nothing against playing dirty, maybe it's time to take the gloves off. Who knows.

[–] xenomor 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s my understanding that his voice condition may very well have been caused by his heroin use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

No sympathy for ghouls.

The moral highground is utterly useless today - something the R's have learned well.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

New my ass! It started with Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich in the 90s, if not even earlier!

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 1 month ago

Yes, this. It goes back even further. It's now, they are empowered and emboldened through Bullshit Mountain + "social media" platforms.

[–] eran_morad 27 points 1 month ago

In 2016 we managed to elect a guy who was very obviously mentally defective and a career criminal. Fuck outta here with “new”.

[–] PumpkinSkink 24 points 1 month ago

Americans stay being aggressively anti-intellectual. It's been that way since waaaay before Trump too. We're gassing up Trump too much with this. Americans have been like this longer than I've been alive.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

new era you say? did that reset after the first time trump was elected, or immediately following the second? new era, for fucks sake

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think of it this way : movies were really popular before talkies came in. So, movies didn't die off when they started talking, but it was a new era. Same thing here; it's still anti-intellectual, just better and shinier

[–] inclementimmigrant 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

New era? Pretty sure we've been living in this isocracy full force since 2008 when the deplorable morons lost their minds and went full stupid racist with the tea party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Oh we've only been experiencing anti intellectualism beta. They're pushing out full release before it's done testing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's new approaches to it. You would usually hear creationists say things like "true science agrees with us". It was nonsense and they never understood how science works, but there was this assumption underlying it that science was correct. They existed in a culture that at least conceptually embraced science and were coming at it from that angle. They were trying to co-opt the aesthetic of science rather than dismissing it entirely.

With attempts at funding freezes in health care and agencies under gag orders, we're seeing a much broader attack on science as a concept.

[–] AshMan85 17 points 1 month ago

no, trump signaled that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last I knew he was being questioned and this article is useless. Did he actually make it through???

[–] Maggoty 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not yet. The GOP is still attempting to show the correct amount of "struggle" before they all vote yes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Gotta pick the 3 senators who are least politically vulnerable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It was intentional

[–] HappySkullsplitter 3 points 1 month ago

Brain worms will do that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Us latinists prefer the term 'Stultiocracy'.

load more comments
view more: next ›