this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
452 points (97.9% liked)

Comic Strips

13196 readers
4726 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 2 days ago

You deserve this for using speaker in an office.

[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Animals don't need to wipe because they don't have massive glutes evolved to support an entire upright body while also walking and running. This is the curse of our intelligence and endurance.

[–] leadore 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OK, I was gonna say it was because they don't have big fat butt cheeks like humans but I like your version better. It's glutes. Yeah that's it, glutes.

[–] Soup 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let’s cut the shit, it’s the curse our fat asses.

[–] Maultasche 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let’s cut the shit

With a poop knife?

[–] Soup 16 points 2 days ago

Only way to be sure.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Did we evolve to like butts because walking upright upright was advantageous? Or did we evolve to walk upright because we liked butts?

[–] AnUnusualRelic 1 points 1 day ago

Does walking upright make the butts more or less visible? They're slightly higher but less prominently displayed.

[–] devfuuu 11 points 2 days ago

Butts are the original boobs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Something that blows my mind is realising how much of our understanding of sex and attraction is socially constructed. For example, there are plenty of documented cultures where women's breasts don't have the erotic connotation we attach to them. The thing that really threw me off was learning about some people who don't kiss as a show of affection — I found this a surreal concept, because in terms of romantic interactions with a partner, I'm fairly meh about sex, but I'm a big fan of kissing/making out; There's a sense in which I obviously know that preference towards kissing is likely not an evolved trait, but more sociocultural, but it feels so intuitive that something so visceral isn't necessarily an innate trait.

Anyway, this is a long way of saying "did we evolve to like butts, though?". Evolutionary biology, the field that would consider questions like these, is unavoidably pretty heavy on the speculation side — given that humans have evolved to be such social creatures, we can't really separate out the sociocultural aspects of development from the genetic side, and that makes asking evolutionary questions on large timescales to be a tricky endeavour.

Edit: This isn't to say that asking these questions is pointless to do. I appreciated your question precisely because it's the kind of thing that cooks my brain (and I enjoy that)

[–] AnUnusualRelic 2 points 1 day ago

We'd have to engineer a race of humans without butts and see if they managed to breed.

[–] CleoTheWizard 11 points 2 days ago

The baboons have been oddly quiet since you asked this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I dunno, but some other brother might deny

[–] LouNeko 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Technically humans don't have to wipe either. But it would be like dried Nutella in a shag carpet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Seems like that would result in a constantly itchy butthole? I guess one could get used to it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Something like that happened to "a friend". During a several day hike, a #2 in the wood was wiped a bit too hastily and some of it was missed.

Now the remnant bits dried and glued the hair from both cheeks together, during the hike after that my "friend" could feel the hairs being pulled from one side to another at each step he was taking.

Not a great experience.

[–] cactusupyourbutt 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you know, you dont have to share every thought that crosses your mind

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

No, no, thoughts like that are the entire point of the internet, and language itself

[–] hakunawazo -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] passiveaggressivesonar 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This makes so much sense.

I've only ever seen this scene in German, where the guy doesn't say "buns and thighs", he just says "Oberschenkelmuskeln" (which means thigh muscles) and I think that's beautiful.

[–] passiveaggressivesonar 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've heard spongebob in German is a quality experience

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They put a lot of effort in the translation and voice acting. Whenever a joke doesn't translate, they come up with something in the same spirit. Sometimes, I like the translation better.

[–] FooBarrington 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As you said, it's very well done, aside from very few impossible-to-solve issues*. There might be some bias at play since I grew up with it, but I'd say it's on par with the original dub. You can check out some examples here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOiBiRt-TOw

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They also do 'wipe.' Quite often, actually. I have seen just about every variety of mammal that I've observed for longer than a few hours lick their bum clean.

[–] MooseTheDog 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary 1 points 1 day ago

It's the flavor saver, Animal Planet edition.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

The wrong thread to stumble into during lunch, but that’s on me.

[–] mortalic 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] metallic_substance 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What in the world is happening in the lower half of the first panel?

[–] edgemaster72 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the person on that end of the phone call is naked in a bathroom looking at themself in a mirror, and the artist made them blurry cuz naked

[–] Buddahriffic 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the blur is to give it a sense of depth rather than censorship. It's just a back, not something dangerous like a nipple attached to a woman.

[–] edgemaster72 2 points 1 day ago

That could also be, and actually I think makes more sense, especially since there's a mirror you'd want that sense of depth, I'd think.

[–] Whelks_chance 1 points 2 days ago

Everyone watched the same scishow video then