this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
195 points (90.5% liked)

Science Memes

12359 readers
3154 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tattorack 119 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Oh by fucking gods. It's loss. People are STILL posting loss. And here I was thinking this was a chemistry meme.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Personally I can't wait for this meme to be dead and forgotten

[–] Tattorack 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, me too. I've never even read the webcomic. Can we please just forget about it already?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Loss will live until the last soulless, inspiration destitute and desperately unfunny aging millennial dies a miserable and ugly death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would be a loss for memory.

[–] Tattorack 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Like that baby

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Carbonated loss

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fixed the charge on your 3-methyl-3,4,5,5,6-pentaethyl-6-butan-2-yl decane ion, aka lossane.

(It's been a while since I last did chemistry, so apologies if I messed up the nomenclature a bit)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

As someone who paid enough attention in highschool chemistry to get a B, and occasionally watches Nile(red/blue) and E&I videos.... I know some of these words/symbols!

[–] sga 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

actually we start numbering by minimising the number of highest order addition, which is the isobutyl, if it gets same number regardless, then we try to minimise the sum of numbers, so i think it should be called

5-(isobutyl)-5,6,6,7,8-penta-ethyl-8-methyl-decane (I am assuming hydrogen's are present, just not represented, because that usually is the case)

I may alo be wrong here, it has been 4 years since I have been required to do nomenclature myself

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, my chemistry department taught me the other way around. I distinctly remember the phrase "methyl-ethyl" being thrown around a bit. Additionaly, we were taught to be more specific about isomers, hence me using butan-2-yl instead of isobutyl.

Then again, scientists often disagree strongly about things like this, so we could both be right. Also, there's a good chance this is just the A-Level specification being weird. I left my old textbook at my student flat, though, so I won't be able to check for a couple of weeks.

I could also be downright wrong myself.

As for the hydrogens, I had assumed they were not present, and that this lossane molecule is an ion with a charge of -50. This is borderline impossible to achieve in real life, of course.

[–] sga 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now i remember we also had to specify what isobutyl (technically just 1 isobutyl exists (not counting stereoisomers), and other form would be tertbutyl). But giving highest priority and minimising sum were definitely something we were taught.

I was free enough to look it up this time - IUPAC guidelines for organic chem - https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Organic-Brief-Guide-brochure_v1.1_June2021.pdf (or more generally https://iupac.org/what-we-do/nomenclature/brief-guides/)

Section 7 ( c ) Lowest locant(s) for principal characteristic group(s)

Although I also remember just as we completed our unit on nomenclature, all we got was "common names", now i was supposed to know of the top of my head what a cumene is (which I think is isopropyl benzene (not going to check this one)). Same thing happened with polymers, we were taught IUPAC, and then again, "industrial names"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any idea what a molecule like that would be useful for?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fuel? Hydrocarbons like that are quite combustible. It could also be incorporated into a lipid or something.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (6 children)

So ... What does this chemical make you lose?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Your marbles.

[–] Reddfugee42 10 points 1 month ago
[–] Gutek8134 5 points 1 month ago

You lose nothing, don't worry about it.

On the other hand, you learn C (the programming language) by ingesting it, which would be considered a punishment by some.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It makes you lose your way in a vast endless c

[–] Ziglin 2 points 1 month ago

Positive thoughts and other particles with a positive charge.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Couldn’t resist. In a more standard form this molecule should (I believe—chemistry has been a long time ago) look like this:

Made with MolView –https://molview.org/?smiles=C%28%5BC%40%5D%28CC%29%28C%29C%28CC%29%5BC%40%5D%28CC%29%28CC%29%5BC%40%40%5D%28C%28C%29C%29%28CC%29CCCC%29C

People knowledgeable in chemistry, please correct!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

If I ever teach chemistry to kids imma tell them to name this

[–] AllToRuleThemOne 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Change/Invert the steric centers at 3 or 6 and it should be fine.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Assuming this has a 47 hydrogens stuck on to make it stable, I'd call it:

3-methyl-3,4,5,5,6-pentaethyl-6-buta-2-yl decane

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

dodecane has a 12 carbon chain. The longest chain here is 10 carbons, which would be decane.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Good catch.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am a total chem nitwit, would you like to explain me how you come to this ?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It basically comes down to finding the longest chain of carbons, then you number each of the carbons on that chain and list off things that are attached to each of them. For example, 1 carbon = methyl, 2 carbons = ethyl, etc.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

The urge to add hydrogens to all the carbons not fully bonded is overwhelming

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

(1,2,2,50)-loss-quinquagintinane

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

I somehow recognized it immediately. I think this meme has rewritten my brain.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

My stoned ass thought this was a shifter tree diagram of a goofy little manual transmission for a sec. All gears are just 'crash', lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

…is this gain?

[–] AtariDump 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can someone explain this to me? I don’t get it, but I want to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OK how long until it kicks in?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a few years and then you die of cancer

[–] Reddfugee42 2 points 1 month ago

*Cccccccccccccccccccccccccancer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

3-metilhexa-4,5,5,6,7,7-etil-4-butil From the head, im feel happy now