this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
1382 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

10203 readers
273 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rob_t_firefly 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I wonder how many lawyers are offering her their services? Because that sounds like a slam dunk lawsuit if I've ever seen one.

[–] chiliedogg 6 points 3 days ago

Slam dunk how?

What employment laws are they breaking?

[–] stoly 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is Alabama. She’s got no chance

[–] JcbAzPx 1 points 2 days ago

It's a federal law they're breaking. The state doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is it America? Is it an at-will state? Where you can be let go at any time, for any reason. Corporations over people. COP. All cops are bastards. All corporations are bastards.

See, it all works out in the end.

We are all bass turds.

Fish shit in the water. Totally unsiftable. Totally fucked.

God save America.

From itself.

This, brought to you from Canada. Who is about to be next in the new global fascist "catch and release" system.

Catch democracy, release democracy.

Like a parent with an errant child. And the parent is too lazy or incompetent to stop the child from hurting itself. And bringing the parent down with it.

Oops.

/rant

[–] FordBeeblebrox 2 points 3 days ago

Good rant. Sorry from this side of the border, I still can’t fully believe so many of my countrymen voted for the villain

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

You can't make this shit up. Reality is so horrible, especially with mega corporations.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago

Newsweek is pretty shit, but at least it's not a screenshot of a tweet so thank you.

[–] shalafi 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Despite lemmy thinking CEOs are useless, they're usually the most important person in the company because they set the tone. That tone rolls downhill. Show me happy or sad employees, I'll tell you what kind of leadership they have.

Bezos set the grind culture when Amazon was starting, and that's fine for a startup, what has to be done. But he never backed off, and now we get shit like this, 100% on him.

Sometimes you have to grind at a shit job to work your way up, I get it. But there appears to be no level at Amazon where you're not under the gun.

[–] Awkwardly_Frank 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But why should anyone have to grind at a shit job? If your business can only survive by grinding people down, maybe society would be better off without it. If the only way we can get same day delivery is over the burnt-out, permanently injured ex-employees of a multi-national, is it really worth it? Maybe that start-up never should have made it. Maybe strong labor laws should have forced them to scale back their ambitions or close their doors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I don't wanna just say "this", but for real, excellently put.

"But we just have to abuse people for a little while until..."

Then it's not a viable business model. Easy as that.

Cooperatives are a thing, and they work, they just don't scale like cancer by generating hype-funding over destroying their employees, so they don't drum up so much excitement from the moneyed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

If they were deemed useless, they wouldn't become a target. The useless phrasing is more that their direction for the purpose of the company is useless overall. Line goes up isn't always a reflection of how well the company is doing for itself and its customers. You are right that CEOs usually set how the company runs, as my work a few years ago transitioned to a new CEO after decades of the first, and it's showing. What's frustrating is when they continue to play off that they are the same company and policy to keep morale up, but it's obvious things are different.

[–] Snapz 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Remember remember the 4th of December....

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Got it. Understood. Any and all Amazon representatives will continue to function after being shot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bezos needs her to suffer more

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

That's what their fans are field with. Liquified Human Suffering (LHS).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Absolutely heartless

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

She's been fucking shot, the hell kind of work do you think she'll do?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Warehouse work apparently

[–] Alpha71 5 points 3 days ago

Got Dam! 2025 said "And fuck you in particular" directly to her face.

[–] morgan_423 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I haven't seen actual articles talking about this... just people tweeting about it.

But if this event actually is what's being reported on the surface, then this is the most constructiest dismissal that ever constructively dismissed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›