225
One dead after Tesla Cybertruck catches fire outside Trump hotel in Las Vegas
(www.theguardian.com)
Trumpster fire.
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
225 points (98.7% liked)
News
27003 readers
6837 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Is it just me or is it weird that they chose "catches fire" instead of "exploded"?
I have a feeling that it may have naturally caught fire (as in, standard tesla feature) and then fireworks they carried with them exploded.
A picture from this ABC article shows gas cans, camping stove cans, and fireworks in the back of the truck. The truck battery somehow survived.
Hahaha I can spot from a mile away the cans of Coleman (possibly Crown) camp fuel.
"somehow" Tesla armour their batteries well, also the fire was above the battery, little would have penetrated down to the battery and since the headlights stayed on during the doomed events, I expect battery cooling was active throughout
This fucking moron thought cans of liquid gasoline would explode?
They did have explosives in there with them, at least in the form of firework mortars.
Explosives and fuel make a good fireball and fire. Fireworks being a 2 stage explosive, they may have expected the initial bang to disburse the fuel and the second to detonate it as a fuel/air explosive which would be very damaging, enough to take down the building.
Obviously were that their goal they did not sufficiently test. The vehicle contained the initial explosion and all they got was a fire
Also, a tip for cybertruck drivers: retract the tonneau cover while carrying explosives and dangerously flammable cargo to add armour between the cargo area and cabin
The driver wouldn't have been so exploded and burnt had they had the back opened and steel between them and the disaster in their cargo area
If this was intentional, I'm guessing being exploded and burnt was the goal.
donvict and the intern might be influencing the reporting, and what's released to the public.
Match made in hell.
With Teslas you don't even need a match.
Cybertruck: You are the kindling!
Take a look at the picture/video https://bsky.app/profile/heyfren.bsky.social/post/3leplxu25722c
I am no expert but that looks kind of intentional. I am curious what the investigation finds out.
Everything I have heard is the cargo area was full of gasoline, camping gas, explosives including firework mortars
None of those things are prone to spontaneously catch fire or explode, so I expect it to be found to have been deliberate
I also expect that like the f150 lightning attack in New Orleans, this vehicle will turn out to have been hired.
I feel like a more flimsy vehicle would have released the fire and explosives more directly against the building, as it was it's only path out was the cabin via windows (the window to the cargo area, then the windows to outside)
The one dead seems to have been the driver
While I'm sure many like to comment on the delicious irony/attack towards Trump/Elon, I'm still curious about the "one dead" portion. It sounds like we have no idea who it was that was killed - possibly even just a random bystander from when it went off.
Which would be really terrible if someone was just detonating a stolen car for a political statement, and then ended up killing an innocent person.
The article read as though the person who died was in the truck. Now maybe it was someone who saw the explosives and was trying to get the truck out of there or something, but I'd assume likely the person who triggered it.
I like this news. Especially after reading about the medication price increases that went into effect today in the US. Burn it down.
IDK, I hate coincidence. This seems to me to be a terrorist attack.
??
What's the coincidence? Who is it terrorizing? What was the target?
Still not a ton of details so I'm for sure not jumping to any conclusions, especially with how shitty Tesla's are and their safety record...
But, Trump Tower and a Cyber truck certainly is the perfect symbolic intersection of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. If one did want to make a symbolic statement about the two, I don't know if I can think of a better intersection. Can you?
Obviously it's not proof of anything and Tesla's fucking suck. But I at least can comprehend why the perfection of the symbolism is noteworthy to people.
Edit: I see in a follow up comment buddy is linking it to New Orleans. I see no connection.
Coincidence with this the same day as New Orleans. Reasons it was a man made act. 1) I've seen information of Teslas spontaneously catching fire, but I haven't seen that they blow up. 2) when you watch the vid, the vehicle was smoking for some time. What was a person still in there for? 3) the explosion itself. The explosion appears to be low order like fireworks and originated in the passenger side rear, blowing out the rear first.
Wouldn't be surprised is all I'm saying.
A lot of crime happened on this day across the US, why the New Orleans specifically?
Fire can lead to explosions, especially in giant batteries. Also, fireworks.
You saw, and understood the smoke. Many people don't notice, or don't question. Some people drive for weeks on low oil and when questioned about why they just say "there was a weird smell, but I didn't know what it was."
The explosion was an explosion? Ummm, yeah?
I don't understand what you're trying to say, you wouldn't be surprised of what?
If you really want to discuss, don't start by discounting what I said in the first place.
A lot of crime happened on this day across the US, why the New Orleans specifically?
Because the New Orleans perpetrator died as a martyr, and here we have another.
Fire can lead to explosions, especially in giant batteries. Also, fireworks.
Great, so how many Teslas have exploded?
You saw, and understood the smoke. Many people don't notice, or don't question. Some people drivet Orleans for weeks on low oil and when questioned about why they just say "there was a weird smell,ira but I didn't know what it was."
Fair enough. But you might notice the floor getting hot
H>I don't understand what you're trying to say, you wouldn't be surprised of what?
I wouldn't be surprised if the ATF found it to be a planned act.
Will you look at that, seems like it was indeed a terroristic attack, if not at least a political statement.
When you're right, you're right.
Guess you can't express an opinion
(don't take this as an attack) I am not sure you meant it this way but your first comment comes across as "I am ruling out coincidence despite a lack of evidence that it was deliberate simply because I don't like coincidences"