this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
677 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39398 readers
1948 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israeli officials fear the pope's vocal criticisms and symbolic gestures - such as this year’s nativity scene in St Peter’s Square featuring baby Jesus resting on a Palestinian keffiyeh - may influence global public opinion.

Created by Bethlehem artists Johny Andonia and Faten Nastas Mitwasi, the nativity scene prominently features Palestinian materials, including olive wood, a symbol of Palestinian resilience.

During its unveiling, Pope Francis condemned the global arms industry for profiting from human suffering and reiterated his call for an end to all wars, urging the faithful to remember those suffering in the holy land.

The display, praised by many as a message of solidarity and peace, drew backlash from Israel’s supporters, who accused the Vatican of promoting a pro-Palestinian agenda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They're gonna call the pope an antisemite

[–] Valmond 0 points 2 hours ago

Well, to be fair were all already calling him a pedophile so...

[–] MehBlah 15 points 10 hours ago

Those assholes have used that word so much its lost all meaning.

[–] bokherif 55 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

HOW CAN YOU CRITICIZE US KILLING CHILDREN????

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Because they’re antisemites ofc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Yeah. But then they are allowed to make fun of the Pope saying stuff like “Between the Pope and air conditioning, I’d choose air conditioning.” and you must laugh for some reason even though the dude is Jewish and so the Pope is nothing to him like any religious leader is nothing to me.

[–] LordWiggle 54 points 1 day ago

Israel's children killing business is cutting into the church child molesting business. It's a conflict of interest.

[–] iAvicenna 31 points 1 day ago

only an anti-semitist would say "don't kill children". they should get him fired for this.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

Israel thinks this is what's going to give them a poor public opinion!?

[–] PugJesus 54 points 1 day ago

Imagine getting upset over "Don't kill children"

[–] scarabic 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is probably a good time to mention that Israel, like all developed nations, has been experiencing a slowing birth rate.

This was a problem for them because the birthrate in the occupied territories was higher, and if you can’t maintain a Jewish majority in the country, how can you maintain the country as a Jewish homeland? This existential doom has hung over Israelis like climate change or the heat death of the universe: even if they aren’t destroyed in fire, they’ll simply dissolve over time until they disappear, and it will all be for nothing.

So you know. I’m not saying that killing Palestinian children was the solution they came up with. But the prospect of a justified way to wipe Gaza clean came their way, and it was too important an opportunity to pass up. If some children must be killed in the process, they think, silently, in the quietest corner of their hearts, then so be it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately the data doesn't support your thesis. child birth graph Haredi jews are having more than double births than the average Israeli Muslim.

Combined (secular etc.) Jewish birth rate is on par (slightly higher) than Israeli Muslims and Palestinians in Gaza. (This was even before all the bullshit started last year)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Just a correction: what you call „Israeli Muslim“ are Palestinians. Very few Palestinians identify as Israeli. The Christians in the plot are also Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I won't argue about other people's identity, but nationality wise - if they have Israeli passport, they are Israeli in the census data.

[–] scarabic 4 points 11 hours ago

Well I got this information from some Israelis I guess you’d describe as “secular Jews” so their POV agrees with their data point in your graph anyway.

Still not shown by this data though, is the birth rate in the territories. I’m not talking about Israeli Arabs and wasn’t before either. It would also help to have some sense of proportion. Haredi Jews are 13% so although their birthrate is high it doesn’t characterize Jews as a whole.

But thanks for providing at least some data here.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't some secret. Listen to John Mearsheimer, who has talked about this for years. it is simple logic.

There is about the same number of Arab Palestinians and Western Israelis in the area. So for the Jewish supremacy ethonstate that Israel wants to be there is only three options:

  1. Indefinite Apartheid. This is extremely costly and as the Arab population keeps growing more and more difficult to maintain. Also it is just preserving the status quo

  2. Ethnic cleansing. Drive all the Palestinians out. However then your neighbors have to harbor them, they form a resistance there, and they keep demanding their right to return.

  3. Genocide. By eradicating them all, you get the "final" solution to permanently steal and settle the land.

So what we see is Israel maintaining option 1 and looking to escalate to option 2 and 3 whenever possible. Notice how they first tried to expel the population of Gaza into Egypt? When this option wasn't possible and they knew that their western supporters in the US, UK, Germany and others were okay with genocide, they escalated to genocide.

The only way to get out of this situation with minimizing further destruction and murder is to abandon the Zionist project in favor of a just state that grants equal rights and justice to everyone living in Palestine.

[–] scarabic 1 points 16 hours ago

I don’t believe I presented the information as a secret. And I agree with everything else you said. I’m a one-state-solution guy. This does mean that the state won’t have one official ethnicity/culture/religion, but I have no regard for the desire to build a state hegemony.

[–] MutilationWave 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have no proof of this, but I think Israeli intelligence knew the October Hamas attack was coming. Probably didn't realize how severe it was going to be, but they may have wanted it for an excuse for everything they did after.

I can't even wrap my head around what the goal of Hamas was with their attack. Surely they knew that Israel's response would be total insanity. Maybe they're drinking their own koolaid even at the top.

[–] jordanlund 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MutilationWave 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, seems like a pretty good source. It reminds me of the "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Within the US" reports that surfaced after the 9/11 attacks. I don't actually believe that GWB was in on it, but I could see the administration letting something happen for reason to go to war.

It's so similar in a way. Perhaps both were intentionally allowed at some level, just underestimated in scale. I can't imagine either of the leaders, Bush or Netanyahu, to allow so many of their "own people" to die and make a mockery of their countries to the world. Perhaps they did. I doubt we'll ever know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shard 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lets not confuse intelligence that something major is going to happen with actionable intelligence where you can preemptively take action to prevent an attack.

Prior to 9-11 there was most definitely increased chatter and I'd hazard a guess that many security and intelligence agencies knew something was going down on US soils but didn't have actionable specifics that would have allowed them to take appropriate action and prevent 9-11.

I think it was a similar issue with Israel and they must have believed that the worse case was an isolated terrorist bombing and to prepare a typical lockdown and emergency services response and not a massive raid on their territories.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OccamsTeapot 148 points 1 day ago (20 children)

This is NotTheOnion material. Like, are you actually mad that the fucking Pope is not on board with killing children?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Crosspost was removed for being 'Not onion-y'. Oh well.

[–] OccamsTeapot 4 points 10 hours ago

Despite being highly upvoted and the comment section agreeing with the onion-y-ness as far as I saw. Ridiculous. Still a good post

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Darkard 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember that part of Jesus's story where he had to flee because a mad king was systematically murdering children because he was scared that the child was "the king of kings".

What a wild parallel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Child murderers complain that their child murdering is being called out"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

The pope is Hamas!

[–] frostysauce 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse 67 points 1 day ago

If you’re on the pro-killing children side, it’s probably time to look in the mirror.

[–] kreskin 39 points 1 day ago

The vatican is finally right about something, even relevant, for once. Good for them. They have a lot to make up for, and this is a start.

[–] givesomefucks 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

“Yesterday, children were bombed. This is cruelty, not war,” the pontiff declared last Saturday, lamenting the immense humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave.

Israel lashed out in response, accusing the pope of ignoring its security concerns.

Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein accused the pope of ignoring the broader context of Israel’s military actions, which have resulted in the killing of 17,000 children.

Maybe everyone should ignore a "security concern" if the only way to alleviate that concern is murdering 17,000 children?

Because whatever group you're concerned about, probably won't like you anymore after you murder 17,000 of their children....

Especially when the reason for your concern is people are mad you keep killing them in the first place.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, if not murdering children is pro-Palestinian, then I guess I'm pro-Palestinian.

And logically, that means being pro-Israeli (or at least pro-Israeli government, because I know there are lots of Israelis who are not happy about what their government is doing) is also pro-child-murder. Their logic, not mine!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Valmond 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

"If you kill them you have fun only once!"

The Pope.

load more comments
view more: next ›