this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
191 points (98.0% liked)

World News

40613 readers
2202 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 69 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Entirely ignorant to soft power

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 month ago

He was just today saying about Musk:

"No, he’s not going to be president, that I can tell you,” Trump said. “And I’m safe. You know why he can’t be? He wasn’t born in this country.”

No understanding of soft power whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Soft power is for soft people! Trump is hard! That's why he's coming in threatening just about everyone. That makes him strong and hard!

And his followers lap it up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did not need an image of Trump being hard. Even Melania doesn’t want to see that anymore at this point.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 1 month ago

Good news is you'd have to make it up, since there's nothing in real life to base it on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Not as hard as Arnold Palmer.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

And also to everything else.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I doubt he knows what that is. Probably thinks it's forcing himself onto someone with a limp dick.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

'Day One' LOL. This dude has 123,964 things scheduled for 'day one'. The man who didn't get to works before Noon when he was pretending to play president last time. He will be playing golf on 'day one'.

[–] FlyingSquid 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't really matter if this doesn't happen on day one if they're still planning on doing it pretty quickly. And based on the article, they are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Real Donald Agenda

Day 1: order 12 mcdonalds egg mcmuffins w/ham & cheese, +16 hash browns throw away biden's portrait, & kamala's too order 60,000 tiny bottles of ketchup order CVS' entire inventory of hair spray order 73.8 gallons of orange foundation practice saying 'huuuuge' 37 times in the mirror find a box of sharpies and change the weather change his ringtone to say 'it's a hoax'. make all the republicans send him fawning text messages play golf

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have to say that I am totally fine with the US no longer having influence over the WHO.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea, it'd be pretty fucking awesome. Maybe we can convince the US to withdraw from the security council and surrender their veto power as well?

[–] mean_bean279 9 points 1 month ago

Then we could use our nukes instead of diplomacy! Nothing like wiping countries off the map because we disagree with them.

[–] mean_bean279 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That would be minimum 15% of their budget wiped out. If we force other US charities (really just 1) to stop, or “convince” them not to we could be talking about a 30% decline in revenue.

Source

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In exchange, the WHO gets to make sane policies about vaccines, women's health, and sexual identity. Could easily be worth it.

[–] NOT_RICK 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you think the US is the only place where people have backwards views towards vaccines, women’s health, or trans rights I have some bad news for you

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

It's not the only place, but it's particularly loud and forceful about swinging those views around internationally.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If that means the Trump administration not having sway over WHO, it’s probably worth it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's roughly a billion / a, nothing other countries couldn't compensate if necessary. I'd rather have my country foot the bill than RFK Jr. having any influence on the WHO.

[–] Treczoks 19 points 1 month ago

It needs a really sick mind in seeing any kind of advantage in such a move.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

And there might be bird flu and his cracy health minister... What could possibly go wrong?

[–] satanmat 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AA5B 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the link