this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
191 points (98.0% liked)

World News

40675 readers
2683 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mean_bean279 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That would be minimum 15% of their budget wiped out. If we force other US charities (really just 1) to stop, or “convince” them not to we could be talking about a 30% decline in revenue.

Source

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In exchange, the WHO gets to make sane policies about vaccines, women's health, and sexual identity. Could easily be worth it.

[–] NOT_RICK 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you think the US is the only place where people have backwards views towards vaccines, women’s health, or trans rights I have some bad news for you

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

It's not the only place, but it's particularly loud and forceful about swinging those views around internationally.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If that means the Trump administration not having sway over WHO, it’s probably worth it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's roughly a billion / a, nothing other countries couldn't compensate if necessary. I'd rather have my country foot the bill than RFK Jr. having any influence on the WHO.