this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
108 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36309 readers
2239 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm referring to the sh.itjustworks instance. Which one would be it? Because I'm kind of confused..

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Balthazar 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Mostly both.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've always read it as "shit just works". Why would the "sh" be there if we weren't supposed to read it?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's a comforting "sh" like "shhhhh", don't worry, it just works.

It's only one h for the double entendre.

/joking

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] sir_pronoun 26 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine a greasy old IT technician coming up to you, putting a finger on your lips and gently saying that after you gasped about the entangled mess of hundreds of Ethernet cables in the server room

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Probably the latter. I've seen it abbreviated as SJW, that's unnecessary don't do that. Am I old?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I dunno, sjw is a lot shorter than shit just works

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah but... SJW means something else lmfao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Savior, Jesus Wept

[–] EleventhHour -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

For starters, because .w is not a valid TLD, and j.w would be registered in about 50 milliseconds if it ever became one.

[–] AnAustralianPhotographer 19 points 2 weeks ago

Hmmm. What if it's because the admin was an old school Linux user and never took to bash. "sh. it just works".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AndrewZabar 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s pronounced like it was something named in the universe of Dune: Zhid-Ghuwerst. You have to raise your eyebrows while you say it, as that’s part of the expression.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

I always assumed that it was supposed to be ambiguous between them for humor purposes

[–] eskimofry 13 points 2 weeks ago

Shhh... we don't ask such things around here.. it just works (tm) that way..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

sh. it's plausible deniability 🤫

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Why not both?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Shell it just works

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Its:

"shhh... nothing is broken, ignore all the bugs and pretend it all just works, mm'kay?"

sh.itjust.works

[–] MimicJar 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's "S Hit Just Works" and it's the slapping car meme.

The "S" is because the car salesman has a slight lisp.

Slaps Instance this bad boy just works.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shhhhhhh... ^itjustworks^

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shit just works - forever and always.

(shh, it just works and shit just works are both valid - the intent was the former IIRC - but the latter is obviously the superior choice. I'm also partial to sh.it.heads when referring to users [cheeky, but thought about in the same way as Deadheads for Grateful Dead fans])

[–] mkwt 5 points 2 weeks ago

Since DNS is hierarchical, it could be set up so that they both work.

[–] ccunning 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“it just works”

The “Sh” is silent…

[–] Zachariah 9 points 2 weeks ago

or at least very quiet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Idk but I picked the instance for the sense of humor in the name either way.

My brain pronounces it as the latter, though the extra jokes make it better.

[–] CaptainBlagbird 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shi Tju - STW orks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always read it as

ess heych dot it just works

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

unacceptable

[–] xploit 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Id put it in the words of god Howard:
It just works https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPN0qhSyWy8

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I pronounce it "this post hidden due to instance block settings".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Any reason you have blocked the instance?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The general trend of the behaviour of the userbase when it first began appearing. I'm pretty block-happy. I'm sure it's an over-generalisation but I've learned over the years that I'd rather miss out than feel constantly annoyed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

because they didn't censor the bad word?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean at least they've said that they blocked it, would have been awkward to try to actually respond to him and just have them never be able to see the post lmao, looking at their post history, I went ahead and blocked them as well because like I could totally see myself trying to respond to him cuz we share a lot of the same communities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Instance blocking does not also block users

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

ah good point, I was under the understanding that it blocks both since that's what happens when I block an instance. I guess that's a client feature.