this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
492 points (98.0% liked)

Pleasant Politics

235 readers
721 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kelseybcool 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AOC Snub Shows How Democrats Refuse to Learn Lessons of ~~2024~~

~~2020~~

~~2016~~

~~2004~~

~~2000~~

~~1996~~

~~1992~~

~~1988~~

~~1984~~

1980

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

When the right wing voters didn't like what their elected leader were doing, they primaried them with more ideologically pure leaders.

Left wing voters just bitch and moan but take no action proving that some of the qualities the right claims of the left, like being lazy and entitled are true.

[–] Badeendje 5 points 21 hours ago

The magas have no problem voting for good enough.. Dem base consistently let perfect get in the way of good... And various factions have a different definition of perfect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Did you read the article? They’re saying that’s possibly what lost AOC some favor with the dem leadership, that she was supporting progressive primary challengers.

[–] Maggoty 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Nalivai -1 points 9 hours ago

Primaries are internal party elections that determine what candidate a party will support for presidency. In US generally speaking the Democratic Party primaries are open or semi-open, so every voter can participate.
For example, in lasr Dem primaries approximately 10 million people vited for Bernie Sanders, 2 for Elisabeth Warren, and 20 for Biden, which amounts to less than 20% of registered voters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The primary every congressional district has. The right ran some crazy fucks against some well established right wing politicians so where is the left's version of this.

Everyone hung up on the presidential primary is failing to heed our own advice to the people who vote for a third party as a protest against the Democratic Party.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 19 hours ago

They are doing that. At least they did in my state.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The one that exists in the argument but not in reality. Keep up. It's straw man season

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure it has nothing to do with multiple billionaire backers like Trump and Thiel pushing their candidates.

Must just be that the left doesn't care in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The billionaire backers came after the crazies won against right wing encumbrants.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

When the right wing voters didn't like what their elected leader were doing, they primaried them with more ideologically pure leaders.

I've been thinking the same thing. The current form of the Republican party that is MAGA is clearly influenced by the Tea Party movement. The Wikipedia entry say the movement dissolved and doesn't say what legacy it left. But in hindsight, it is clear that it made the Republican party evolve into MAGA that it is today.

The Democratic Party should have its own MAGA movement but from the left. The American left only seem to be animated if the candidate or leader is deemed progressive enough. They don't seem to actively try to influence the Democratic Party themselves unlike what the right did to the Republican Party.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

What I find hilarious is that every "progressive" leader that does make their way in ends up being a Republican/Russian puppet. (See Sinema/Fetterman).

Proves horseshoe theory is real. The DNC doesn't care about you guys because you've shown you don't care about the DNC. Bitch all you want but why should they try to pursue lazy kids who bitch and moan but don't vote when it counts or protest vote.

That's why the DNC drives further right because at least that voting base actually consistently votes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The tea party was astroturfed. There's no wealthy PACs propping up a movement of soc dems like AOC

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know. It's not directed at you but I think anyone who disagrees with a movement would always find ways and angles to smear it.

Nonetheless, many of what had been advocated by the Tea Party movement-- both social and economic policies-- are still visibly present and implemented by MAGA. So I think even with astroturfing, the goals of those involved in Tea Party had their way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

even with astroturfing

That's basically the point though, right? Without astroturfing the tea party probably wouldn't have grown into maga. Compare the occupy wall st movement (as mentioned below)-- there was no corporate backing so it fizzled as soon as popular support couldn't sustain it. But money kept pumping into the tea party and it eventually metastasized into maga.

[–] Fandangalo 8 points 1 day ago

Growing up with these movements, it felt like the Occupy Movement could have been that, but it was smeared by The Powers That Be alongside infighting or a focus on strange parliamentary procedure. It helps with cops also are on your side (Tea Party).

I don’t think the left makes enough persistent noise at their leadership compared to the right. I’m really proud of the recent strike announcements from Unions & hope they stick through the tough shit.

I volunteer in municipal work on a town board local to me. It’s not much, but there’s a few chuckleheads “from the private sector” that think they know everything in five minutes. If you put hard facts and actually argue them in proper settings with conviction, you can at least have a voice in the bullshit around you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's really very simple:

On one side, there's integrity and convictions and serving the interests of the American people.

And on the other side, there's a handful of corporations and wealthy individuals who will give them money in exchange for protecting their privilege.

And the Democrats have chosen the money

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As have the republicans. So now there are no political options for addressing the material concerns of the working class.

BOLD MOVE COTTON

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

At least it's on-brand for R. D still tries to pretend otherwise.

So now there are no political options for addressing the material concerns of the working class.

BOLD MOVE COTTON

Good point, that didn't go well last time did it? Those who forget history...

Looks like our politicians are going to be doomed to repeat it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Failing to cultivate younger politicians is exactly why people are disillusioned with the party, and why they had to keep running Biden in the first place. SMH

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

It should have been Bernie in 2016, yet here we are.

[–] enbyecho 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm one of those people who spent a lot of time cheer-leading the Democratic party and the Harris campaign before the election. I still think it was the right thing to do given the alternative. AND I still think that anyone who stayed home or voted for Trump is a moron. But now that the worst possible thing has come to pass and we're gonna have to spend the next couple of decades dealing with the consequences anyway: Fuck the Democrats. I'm done.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Fuck the Democrats. I’m done.

the only thing that matters to them is that you vote for them in 2028 and people will be calling you a moron for not falling in line.

[–] enbyecho 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I live in California. My vote doesn't count for sheeet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

not california; but i'm also in a blue state

i vote swapped so that i can vote 3rd party to give them the middle finger; it's not much, but it's the only thing i can do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, Pelosi has been a non-stop blight. It's time to cut out the cancer, here.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I’m not sure USA politics can be solved by replacing individuals. Seems to be an institutional issue

[–] SlopppyEngineer 21 points 1 day ago

You have to replace individuals to change the institutions

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we need to sacrifice a few more CEOs to the money gods just to test this theory. For science.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Let's start with people and see what changes. "Institutional issue" is often a product of just a handful of people. Remove the entrenched old money Dems and watch progressives flood the party.

The left is now "business focused" and the right is "money focused" with no room for the problems of us normal people. If CEO and business are determined to set a line between us and them, then "us" will unite to become"we" and they don't that. Let's get rid of the people who are a problem and use the organization they use to promote those who care about other people.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

At least the Palestinian genocide is over now because those Dems didn't learn the lesson or whatevs.

🤡

[–] workerONE 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think it's important to realize that there is corruption in the Democratic party (too). We need a left wing party. People paint left wing ideas as crazy but the opposite is true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most people have realized it. But many people also keep repeating the "2 party, can't be helped, lesser evil" line. This latter point is the problem.

[–] workerONE 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I mean, the whole political system has been corrupted by capitalism, with politicians spending 30% of their time fundraising and meeting with lobbyists. Lobbying is essentially legal bribery so there's no need for illegal corruption. However, elected representatives should not be acting against their constituents interests.

[–] khannie 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Too soon to expect that. They still haven't learned their lesson from 2016. A lesson from 2024 never stood a chance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

They haven't learned their lesson since 1980.

[–] Jimmycakes 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They don't care if they protect their party or the people they represent. They care about getting as much personal wealth as possible for themselves. Exactly the same as Republicans but they at least represent a portion of their voters by passing crazy laws for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billwashere 5 points 1 day ago

I’m 54 and I’m tired of this old guard. We need some new blood and energy.

load more comments
view more: next ›