this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
131 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39277 readers
2447 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Puberty blockers for under-18s with gender dysphoria will be banned indefinitely across the UK except for use in clinical trials, the government has announced.

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said that after receiving advice from medical experts, he would make existing emergency measures banning the sale and supply of puberty blockers indefinite.

The Department of Health and Social Care said the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) had published independent expert advice that there was “currently an unacceptable safety risk in the continued prescription of puberty blockers to children”.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund 8 points 3 hours ago

Unacceptable safety risk in trans kids feeling comfortable with who they are as human beings.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 8 hours ago

Puberty blockers to be banned indefinitely for under-18s with gender dysphoria across UK

I fixed the title. Of course, they're still available for other medical conditions, they're just singling out gender dysphoria.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 9 hours ago

So puberty blockers are not legal until puberty is over? Makes complete sense /s

[–] TheBananaKing 2 points 5 hours ago

evil fucking bastards

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 hours ago

Wes Streeting is pro child self-harm, at least as long as those children are trans. Fucking scum

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] anon6789 3 points 7 hours ago

I don't know about the issue enough for me to comment on if she is biased or not, but I found this NYT interview (archive.org link) and she really seems to try to be playing both sides to me. Her main arguement seems to be don't treat this as an issue to resolve gender, that makes you ignore mental health/depression/other things, but with there not being the best care of that nature available for trans individuals, what avenue is left for them?

It sounds like she wants to go on about a lack of enough proof for her to stop treatment, but it also doesn't sound like she has enough proof to say it's harmful, but that doesn't seem to discourage her helping eliminate it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do they think puberty blockers do?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago

think

I'm gonna stop you right there, no useful thought process was involved here at all.

[–] NOT_RICK 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Care to elaborate on the safety risks there, Wes?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

While I don't agree with it's findings, there is a 388-page report this decision is based on.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

that was debunked numerous times

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What was the debunked? That a report exists?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

the entire points of the report were debunked.. like a lot

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

K...I started my original comment with, "While I don’t agree with it’s findings," and was responding to a comment asking for elaboration on the safety risks. I was just providing context, not stating the report was gospel-truth or anything.

[–] STOMPYI 2 points 3 hours ago

Wait... are you saying you are a messenger? GET HIM!!!1111

[–] nickhammes 5 points 6 hours ago

The report exists, but it has so many errors, misinterpreting its own data to bend to the conclusions its authors decided they wanted to find, lots of cherry picking, and ignoring any fact inconvenient to its conclusions.

Imagine a paper that concludes that dowsing or homeopathy is good science. It's about that accurate.

[–] vivavideri 1 points 1 hour ago