this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
738 points (97.8% liked)

Games

32906 readers
1260 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Funko did not request a takedown of the @itchio platform."

Man, I fucking hate corpo-speak like this.

Yes, you didn't personally make the request against itchio.... But you hired this company to enforce "brand protection" and that's what they did. So you did actually request the takedown, but you just did so by authorizing another party to make such requests on your behalf.

This is like a military General saying "hey I didn't commit any warcrimes, I just gave the orders to my men to commit warcrimes!"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago

Translation: "we didn't think this predatory behavior would affect our bottom line, and we deeply regret that it has."

[–] pyre 32 points 6 days ago

AI to determine people's livelihoods, huh?

By the way, who's the Brandshield CEO? Asking for a friend.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Corporate doing corporate shit. And then asking why people hate corporations and their CEOs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People used to think so highly of CEOs, that they must be doing something right if they got to where they are. They must be smarter and have all the answers.

Now people are realizing CEOs are just rich scumbags.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Yep, I'm sure most of them just bought their positions there to have power over society.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The fact that a legit website could be taken down just by a big corporation claim, without any further third party or gubernamental investigation. Is indeed frightening.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Nintendo people: First time?

[–] oVerde 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If only we had a few more Luigi, these corpo-shit would think twice

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

They really like to show off how much power they have and how self defense is, indeed, justified.

They do and undo like there's no consequences whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They always talk about how giving coverage leads to copycats. Typically that has meant me getting pissed at the over coverage of mass shootings, but now I'm sitting here waiting like... Okay? Any day now? Maybe not.

[–] caseofthematts 367 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

I'm just going to post this comment to this thread as well, since this is newer. Classic shifting of blame and no one taking responsibility for scummy actions.

Fun fact: Funko's current CEO is the ex-president of Wizards of the Coast!

Why is this relevant? Well, under her leadership, WotC sent pinkerton agents to someone's home to threaten them because they got some Magic the Gathering cards early. She said things like Dungeons & Dragons players were under-monetised, pushing to make the Table Top game more like a microtransaction-filled video game, and helped with the OGL scandal.

The OGL, for anyone unfamiliar, was an Open Gaming License WotC had for years with D&D 3rd party creators. It allowed certain things to be created using D&D mechanics and lore by anyone that followed its guidelines and allowances. A couple years ago, WotC tried to change that so they would make more money off of people trying to create things for D&D - to profit off of indie creators passionate about the game. There was a huge backlash, and they eventually went back on this decision.

All this to say, you can see what kind of leader the current Funko CEO is, and what's happening with itch isn't surprising to me.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 239 points 1 week ago (14 children)

They requested a takedown before talking to the website owners? That's such a hostile move

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 236 points 1 week ago (23 children)

So Funko issued a non-apology blaming Brandshield.

Brandshield issued a non-apology blaming the registrar (Iwantmyname), and saying their AI tool definitely had nothing to do with it

And Iwantmyname hasn't even put out a statement.

Fucked all around, yet it seems nobody will be facing consequence for this except Itch.io who got their website nuked out of nowhere.

Though if I were Itch, I'd get a new registrar ASAP.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What I find really weird is I have a website, or had a website years ago, that someone issued a DMCA takedown to it, but it was totally fraudulent. The registrar sent me an email to say they had received the takedown request, had reviewed it, found it to be invalid, and we're taking no further action.

They didn't send me this email until after they'd already decided to ignore the report. Start to finish the whole thing took about 3 days. That was for some tiny irrelevant website that no one except me and a few users would have even cared if it had been taken down. Why didn't they do the same for a massive internationally well-known website?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

You make a good point. Even disregarding how well known Itch is, their registrar acted woefully incompetently by not even attempting to contact Itch.io about the takedown request (which is what Brandshield should have done in the first place)

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›