this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
261 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump's sons are scurrying across the globe to secure new deals with foreign governments for the Trump Organization

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus 130 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Why should he? He has only benefitted from this behavior. This is what happens when accountability doesnt exist.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rich people have forgotten that law is the peaceful solution. When that no longer works, people tend to take things into their own hands.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

One recently found out himself...

[–] TropicalDingdong 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

1000%

The administration showed their hand that they didn't really care about justice or the rule of law by sitting on their hands on going after Trump for J6 until basically too late, and even then, in a purely performative manner. They did not care about the relationship between a literal attack on our democracy and justice and accountability for the powerful. Look at Brazil. Look at SK. Both orders of magnitude more committed to the project of democracy than the US Democratic party.

In not going after Trump the very hour after taking power set Trump up for victory by putting the full cynicism of the Democratic party establishment on display. Everything that happened from 2021-2024 is an inevitable result of this weakness.

[–] UsernameHere 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This toxic escapism you are engaging is why the Democrats and their sycophants represent a stain on democracy globally.

WHY did Trump escape justice?

THE FUCKING DEMOCRATS ARE FUCKING WHY!!!

This apoligism you insist upon is the very reason why Trump has been able to get away with everything he has, and while it's small condolences, at least the world now sees these kind of idiotic arguments you are asking for what they are.

[–] UsernameHere 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Judges made the decision to delay the trials on Trumps request. Not democrats. You’re doing the GOPs work for them.

[–] TropicalDingdong -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats waited fucking years to start. They should have arrested him on day one. Accepting their excuses is why they think they can get away with shit.

[–] UsernameHere 4 points 1 week ago

Trump has delayed almost all of his trials. Not democrats. You scapegoating democrats for Trumps actions helps the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Ooh! Ooh! Don't forget its ALSO THE FUCKING REPUBLICANS ARE FUCKING WHY! There is blame on both sides, but Republican fawning has given Trump EVERY advantage that would have sunk a person percieved as less rich.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They tried so hard, and failed. They succeeded in getting rich and securing the safety for the future of their children at least. Pardon Me Too# good-bye 🙃

[–] UsernameHere 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ya I’m sure the democrats wanted Trump to delay his trials and become president to secure the safety for their children. Because that’s what lizard people do when the earth is flat.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You continue to insist to have ineffective losers represent you. Trump has conned the maga uninformed and undereducated, you have been swindled by the same elite insider trading, healthcare denying, in bed with corporations and military complex. Because your feelings. Facts hunter Biden was pardoned, facts none of the damage done by any administration will effect any of these politicians, facts their families will be the last and least affected by climate change. Have fun licking boots and struggling to pay for groceries.

[–] UsernameHere 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So you’re one of those “both sides are the same” bad actors.

I haven’t insisted on anything just calling out a bad faith argument. That seems to get you worked up. Especially when I called out your ridiculous conspiracy theory.

There is no politics without corporate influence anywhere in the world. Even without citizens united businesses will try to influence government. Same with military. Trump is filling every office position with billionaires and foreign actors and your trying to pretend both sides are the same. If you wouldn’t pardon your own son in the same situation then you’re a shitty father. Any damage done by any administrations will effect all administrations. Democrats have passed climate change legislation while the GOP denies it’s existence and you claim they’re the same. Inflation has been trending down for the past few years but will now start going up again because of tariffs thanks to Trump. But you claim both sides are the same in bad faith.

Sounds like you drank the qanon kool-aid.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

You absolute clown, you unimaginative, brainwashed, propaganda spewing, sound byte parrot. You absolutely deserve everything and all that will happen to you. At least you got to choose the color of rope used to hang you. Blue is a good color. Good day to you.

[–] blazeknave 3 points 1 week ago

Merrick Garland is a fucking bitch. Glad to see his true colors instead of jerking off about a scotus that could have been

[–] Chainweasel 35 points 1 week ago

Why would he?
The Supreme Court legalized anything he does as an official act.
If he issued an executive order that all federal employees must use his hotel chain when travelling he can't be investigated for Emoluments clause violations, Misappropriation of funds, Federal Procurement Violations, etc as it was an official act which he receives absolute immunity for.

[–] metallic_substance 35 points 1 week ago

This is how fascism works.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

He hid it last time?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

...he didn't bother to hide it the first time, either?

This time he's just far more brazen about being a vengeance filled asshole.

What's he deserve vengeance for anyway? Being a coddled fucking loser his whole stupid fuck life? Yawn.

[–] Omegamanthethird 4 points 1 week ago

For real, that doesn't sound any different than the first time. I'm certain there's somewhere that you can point to where he's more open about it. But he was already pretty open about funneling money to him and his kin.

[–] capital 11 points 1 week ago

No need. US voters are fine with it. Look at the election for proof.

[–] MushuChupacabra 11 points 1 week ago

He didn't bother last time.

[–] eran_morad 11 points 1 week ago

why the fuck would he?

[–] Rapidcreek 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why should he? Robert's gave him immunity

[–] Psythik -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

And don't forget that Jack Smith dropped the documents charges like the bootlicker he is. Everyone's falling in line. All for this fat orange dumbass. It's pathetic.

[–] jas0n 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I believe the reason for that is so it can continue after his presidency. He can shut it down entirely if it's ongoing.

[–] Snapz 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're not informed enough to have this strong an opinion.

[–] Psythik -1 points 1 week ago

Trump doesn't follow the law, so why should everyone else have to?

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's bullshit. If it were anyone else, their ass would already have been rotting in prison over a year ago. I'm not buying the "he has no choice" excuse.

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who cares about lawyers? Trump doesn't follow the law, so why should Smith have to?

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 1 week ago

Obviously you care about lawyers. You brought them up.