this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
555 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5932 readers
3600 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (7 children)

Wtf is that event name? That is possibly the most convoluted way to write "disability awareness day".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

I work in an accessibility-focused field and can say person-first verbiage is more important for those with visible/ serious conditions that society tends to focus on over them as a person.

The spirit is that you view them as a person, instead of a their condition. It might seem obvious, but imagine you have a very visible physical disability. People are always talking about your condition, asking you about it, it's the first thing people focus on when they meet you. As a person, you don't want your condition to define who you are. As an example, if you worked really hard to win a major award, would you prefer the headline "First Name Last Name Wins Award", or "Severely Autistic Person Wins Award"?

It's fairly nuanced, and within some groups (such as ASD) there is actually pushback against person-first. But then there's people that it really helps so it's more of a "just be chill and not a dick about things" kind of vibe. Kind of like pronouns where some people make a huge fuss whenever they're mentioned. In reality, it's more about just treating people with respect as well as not walking on eggshells around everyone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

It's literally the same logic that led to "people of color", just applied to having a disability.

[–] Nalivai 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The convoluted one puts an emphasis on a person, not on a disability. I am aware of my disability always, I don't need a special day for it. A day to recognize me might be nice however. That sort of logic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

I am aware of my personhood always, and don’t need any special emphasis on it.

[–] surewhynotlem 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

They had to find something between #DayOfRememberanceOfThoseWithDifferingAbilities and #CrippleDay.

But yeah, it does seem off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

"Persons With Differing Abilities" is just a few steps down the euphemism treadmill from where we are now. Give it twenty years.

[–] samus12345 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

"Handicapable Day"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think it stems from a movement to stop identifying people first by their disability. I think along the lines of the difference between "Here's a disabled person" or "Here's a person who happens to have a disability." Lots of people would rather be first identified as a person.

Shrug.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The idea that an adjective being literally first in a phrase, determining what a person “is identified as” first, is ridiculous.

[–] samus12345 3 points 13 hours ago

Agreed, that's just a quirk of English. Not a problem in Spanish.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

But I have to have a way to look down on people who are sympathetic to my cause but aren’t serially online. How else will everyone know I’m more compassionate than you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

DAD is a much better acronym.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Guess we're crying on the toilet today

[–] i_am_tired_boss 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

The company is nice

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

That's a daily routine.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Before I got my glasses the stars looked big and well star shaped, with lots of little spikes, I was utterly disappointed when I got my glasses, looked at the night sky and they're just dots, boring ass dots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

Oh I had the same experience with my friend's hair. I used to like being behind her in line because her hair was like a flowing, floaty cloud. When I first wore glasses, I could see each hair and it became like a tangle of wires.

[–] Speculater 26 points 22 hours ago

Go out into nature, far far from civilization and light pollution. It's a very different picture.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You should try looking up at the stars with night vision some day. It's spectacular.

...Or so I've heard. I'm one of the poors that can't afford unfilmed gen III white phosphor tubes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

Just mine your own phosphor at home

[–] [email protected] 26 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Was there really not a shorter title than Day of Persons With Disabilities?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

"Spaz day" wouldn't get the right message across, I suppose.

[–] Squizzy 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

DisabledDay is a no go aparrently

[–] Wogi 4 points 16 hours ago

Leg disabled day is the one we always skip. Thankfully Roy has us covered.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 18 hours ago

And miss the chance of that amazing acronym that just rolls of the tongue?

[–] frog_brawler 8 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I’ll be that guy… in reality, an Axolotl and a Chameleon aren’t going to be hanging out and looking at the night sky. Axolotls live under water and can spend short periods of time outside of the water. Chameleons live above water and spend almost no time under water. These two animals live in environments that are inherently exclusive to one another.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I like how you had to dive into those specifics to see this was unrealistic, and both of them speaking and understanding English is completely looked over.

Talking animals? Fine! But damned if two from different habits are hanging out! Suspension of disbelief broken!

[–] frog_brawler 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Anthropomorphism is substantially more common than aquatic animals comfortably living on land.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Anthropomorphism is attributing human traits to non-humans. Maybe the axolotl has the human trait of being just fine on land. That's why both are sitting like humans.

There, I fixed it for you. You can now enjoy the comic.

[–] frog_brawler 1 points 7 hours ago

Haha, I respect where you are coming from with that.

[–] Viking_Hippie 23 points 19 hours ago

Maybe they're star crossed lovers

[–] Wogi 8 points 16 hours ago

It's a cute comic dude.

No one is asking you to be that guy. No one cares.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, that's what makes it such a fun Hallmark ~~fish~~ axolotl-out-of-water movie! Duh...

[–] Cris_Color 5 points 22 hours ago
[–] SpaceNoodle 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They had a vision? What was it?

[–] Viking_Hippie 3 points 19 hours ago

That one day, the new Dragon Age game would be extremely purple.