this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
185 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19229 readers
3241 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney dismissed the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as a “PR campaign,” noting it lacks statutory authority and cannot implement changes independently.

While praising Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s goals to cut bureaucracy and waste, Mulvaney emphasized DOGE must rely on Congress or the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to enact reforms.

He highlighted Russ Vought, the incoming OMB Director, as important to the initiative’s success, despite Musk and Ramaswamy’s higher profiles.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote 69 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I work for the federal government, and there most definitely are ways to make it more efficient. However, everything I've seen from Musk and Ramaswamy only sound like ways to cut productivity while leaving spending pretty much untouched. Maybe that's what they actually want, I dunno.

[–] just_another_person 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

All of these fools are just out to prove that "the gubment" shouldn't be doing anything but push paper, and everything should shift to privatization. Yes, meaning them and their friends. Musk is probably going to try and make Twitter the defacto messaging platform for all government entities...yes, seriously.

GOP has been pulling this shit since the 80's. Claim government wasteful spending, and shift tax dollars to their buddies or their own companies and call it "privatization". It's a scam to literally make people who live here just pay them money for doing nothing. In no way will they make anything better or save money.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Or gut government services and cry about how bad they are and that they need to be privatized

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, they just want to punish people who oppose them - that's why Musk called out the CFPB in particular.

Don't hold your breath for Musk to cut Tesla subsidies because they create market inequities.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, real “efficiency” would come from standardizing tools and procedures, getting rid of “shadow IT”, making annual budget requests more flexible (ie if we don’t use it this year we won’t get it next year), and empowering the workers to make more decisions and initiatives without involving committees, managers, etc.

They are not doing that. It’s not about efficiency, it’s a libertarian crusade to strip out anything valuable from the public sector and leave what’s left to rot.

[–] DaddleDew 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It would be hilarious if they told Elon he has this powerful position and he goes around telling people what to do but it's just a plot to keep him happy and distracted. People pretend to listen and then once he's gone they just ignore what he said and do what actually needs to be done.

You know, like how SpaceX is run already.

[–] Bassman1805 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, that sounds like the modus operandi at his one company that's legitimately successful underneath the hype.

[–] DaddleDew 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He did nearly bankrupt Tesla after he stole the company from its original founders and demanded that the cars have flush-fitting door handles, completely ignoring his engineers advice that the R&D would be extremely expensive and time consuming because of the safety regulations requiring the handles to still be functional after a crash.

[–] 800XL 1 points 2 weeks ago

Read about what he did to Paypal too. Same shit. Elon is a moron.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

You mean like they do with trump? 🤪

[–] DarkCloud 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, Russ Vought will be the one whose actually in charge of budgeting and costing policies, and he's worse than Musk and Ramaswamy.

He was a co-author of Project 2025.

[–] takeda 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I feel Elonia and Ramaswamy are only there to divert attention to them, while the actual work will be done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Department Of Gaslighting Everyone

[–] jaybone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Department of Gaslighting Elon

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

DOGE-ing taxes.

[–] inclementimmigrant 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, well see. I fully expect the spineless Republicans to fully follow through with whatever musk tells them because he has three toadstool of Trump in his mouth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Real things come with preexisting rules and procedures. This new thing can be whatever m'dudes!