this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
152 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19267 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Robert Reich argues that Wall Street, not political or institutional checks, will be the primary constraint on Donald Trump’s upcoming presidency.

While Trump’s cabinet includes disruptive figures like RFK Jr. and Pete Hegseth, his pick for Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, a hedge fund manager tied to Wall Street, signals an intent to reassure financial markets.

Wall Street’s fear of inflation and stock market instability could curb Trump’s tariff plans, despite their populist appeal.

Ultimately, Reich criticizes the reliance on markets, rather than democratic mechanisms, to limit Trump’s power.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BMTea 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What an understatement of a headline.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The guardian has the hottest takes.

💩

[–] DirkMcCallahan 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

AMA request: Someone who genuinely believes that Trump's cabinet will be anti-Wall Street.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I believe his (and Putin's) goal is to destabilize (destroy) the western order, devalue the current global currency (USD), crash the central banks, fully shift economic power eastward, inflate crypto.

Tariffs on all north American trading partners will cause harm to the entire continent and beyond.

If none can trade, none can profit. If the tarrifs go to gov, with this admin, will they really?

The only thing pro wall street will be how they siphon off whatever wealth is left, pump and dump, crash and burn.

[–] Sludgehammer 10 points 1 month ago

Trump has no goal other then self gratification and being the center of attention. Putin's goal is to destabilize the US and he's doing that by supporting Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Paradoxically Trump only cares about cash of which I imagine is American currency. So confusing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Surely this cabal of billionaires will be just the ones to put those rotten billionaires in their place!

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 month ago

It's weird how the qons all have deluded themselves into thinking they are some kind of rebels, sticking it to The Man, by voting for a Manhattanite and alleged billionaire who has been thirsty to be accepted among the upper of the upper crust all of his sad little life.

The same batch rally around slogans like "save the children" because they think Hillary is trafficking children for pedos - then they vote for a pedo who was besties with a prominent pedo before he died in jail and who is the type that nominates another pedo for AG.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

Mf he is literally Mister Wallstreet, that was his entire shtick and TV personality, how the fuck anyone got "he's anti wall street" out of that needs to be committed

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I had thought tfg and his cabinet were entirely pro Wall Street ...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Why the hell would it be? Donald Trump is a lifelong corpo. Anyone who believes he gives a single shit about the common folk is delusional.

The system will be tuned to work even better for corporate profits at the expense of the citizens.

[–] alquicksilver 8 points 1 month ago

Announcing the continued mascot of the responses to the incoming administration:

Congratulations, surprised Pikachu! 🎉

Special commendation for the runner up, Face-eating Leopard. 🏆

[–] TheTechnician27 7 points 1 month ago

"Pol Pot isn't as anti-agrarian as some Cambodians may want to believe."

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 1 month ago

LOL, anti-Wall Street? What fucking voters believe that?

For all of his pathetic bullshit life, donvict has wanted to be among the elite of Wall Street. What kind of complete dumbass thinks he's going to be ANTI Wall Street?

[–] hark 6 points 1 month ago

Who thought it would be? I see Musk's name come up repeatedly in the article, but I don't know why he'd think this or even why he'd be mad about this since he owes his vast fortunes to wall street. I could imagine cryptocurrency clowns thinking Trump would give them an anti-wall street cabinet, but they're too stupid to realize that bitcoin is valued as high as it is now because of wall street, even though these same clowns were cheering so hard about bitcoin ETFs being approved a short while ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The “anti” was “sarcasm”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Unrelated but that is an extremely unfortunate name to have today.

[–] Lasherz12 1 points 1 month ago

He hired a top investor for their ultimate boogeyman, George Soros... The lesson to take is once you give a narcissist what he wants that is the end of your usefulness and your opinion being honored is no longer a means to an end. This important lesson will be unlearned in less than 4 years.