this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
173 points (87.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

30539 readers
1104 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

'Choose' rhymes with 'lose'? I mean c'mon, someone did that shit on purpose πŸ‘€

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

The bigger problem is that lose should rhyme with pose or close. Loose is fine.

[–] spankmonkey 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Don't get me started on ough and ead.

The lead soldier kneaded dough in the bough brush while they read the book that they previously read while taking a furlough in the rough.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Didn’t even have to click. Great poem

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I barely started reading and i hate this already.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 9 points 2 months ago

I read this and all I could think of was "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How can the soldier knead anything if they're made of lead?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] over_clox 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Hoes drop their clothes.

Who the hell decided that close is pronounced the same as clothes?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (32 children)

No one? They aren't pronounced the same in any accent that I'm aware of.

Edit: I'm dumb. I was reading that as the "nearby" close and not the "shut " close.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Okay as a non-native speaker who struggles with consonant clusters this is both the best and worst thing I learned today.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey we may have our language rules pulled from 30 different other languages and applied seemingly at random, but at least we don't have to memorize the gender of every inanimate object in the world!

I've taken 5 years of German and self studied some Russian and Spanish, and goddamn that gendered noun shit is really, really hard for native English speakers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Okay you got me there. Also for what it's worth, gendered nouns are hard even when you natively speak a language with gendered nouns. Source: Am an Arabic speaker and will Jihad anyone who says a chair is female.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 6 points 2 months ago

They sound pretty close to me. We can close this issue.

[–] SandLight 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know that they sound that different, but I definitely "pronounce" them differently in that my tongue is in a different party of my mouth for both of them. When I say clothes, my tongue is near touching my front teeth, where as close is more just below that ridge behind my teeth, so farther back.

I'm from the center of the U.S. for reference.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

They never did. Their spelling, meaning, and pronunciation are the same as they have always been.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they are very different in my mind. perhaps because i first came across them in their respective contexts through reading.

even when speaking, to me, lose rhymes with booze and loose rhymes with goose.

this has never been a problem for me, personally.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And here's me, another non-native speaker, just learning that booze doesn't rhyme with goose.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman 6 points 2 months ago

oh, no, no, no! booze and a goose should never go together!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

I mean yeah 'loose' could probably be pronounced like 'choose' and it would still make sense, but it absolutely wouldnt make sense for 'lose' to be pronounced like 'moose' or 'goose'. Im not sure what you even mean when you say they switched meanings either because thats just false.

[–] NorthWestWind 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

May as well combine words with the same pronunciation into one word and call it Simplified English (/s)

Honestly tho, this is one of the features of Simplified Chinese, which created the infamous "fuck vegetables" (干菜类).

It's meant to say "dried vegetables" (乾菜鑞 in TC), but δΉΎβ†’εΉ². Meanwhile, there exists εΉΉβ†’εΉ² as well, which means "fuck".

fuck vegetables

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jimmy90 16 points 2 months ago

english is a very silly language that's evolved so you can do almost anything with it

it's a risky strat but it seems to have worked

[–] db2 13 points 2 months ago

They didn't, except among the ignorant and autocorrect.

[–] vaper 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Loose rhymes with noose. I can't think of a word that's spelled and pronounced like lose so you have me there.

choose lose cruise booze

all rhyme lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's a miracle I know it, and having to teach someone how to read and spell was an eye opener for me trying to explain "this is like this except for this one word because... Reasons and sometimes there's a variation like this because...reasons" so many times.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Agreed, I am teaching my second son to read.

I am having the same conversations as when I taught my first to read.

"ok, this word is a 'sight word' because it doesn't make the sounds you expect. It says won, but it looks like it says on-e"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Mostly the "reasons" just boil down to etymology. We spell things the way the languages we stole them from spelled them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about the words that are only different in tone.

Content and content

[–] spankmonkey 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is read like lead, not read like lead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] over_clox 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's ~~too~~ ~~to~~ two different ways to pronounce and spell many words.

Fuck, that's three!

[–] AnAustralianPhotographer 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Steady up over ~~their~~ ~~they're~~ there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, if they swapped meanings and then swapped spellings then doesn't that mean they're the same as before?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corvett 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jerb322 8 points 2 months ago

Trust me, it is equally frustrating for most Americans...or almost, anyway.

[–] Aeao 8 points 2 months ago

Read rhymes with lead, and read rhymes with lead, but lead doesn't rhyme with read and lead doesn't rhyme with read.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Are you familiar with β€œThe Chaos” by Gerard Nolst TrenitΓ©?

Deep breath:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chaos

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe the generally accepted scientific term for the English language is "clusterfuck".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Okay TIL that these aren't pronounced the same.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If we start now, we can probably switch the pronunciations of Aristotle and chipotle within a generation.

Chip-ot-el

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scarabic 4 points 2 months ago

English is idiosyncratic as hell. Didn’t someone famous call it β€œnot a language but 3 languages in an overcoat.”

Adding to this specific instance is that even native speakers spell things wrong. They loose their keys, etc.

[–] Here4CatPics 4 points 2 months ago

It's a lose/loose situation

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί