this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
116 points (90.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43913 readers
1335 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the United States, I'd probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

Probably Dildo, Newfoundland.

You know why.

Edit: Actually, I think Dawson City is smaller. It's famous for being a big city back during the gold rush, despite being up near the arctic circle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The smallest Indian city that (almost) all Indians would know would be the hill resort of Shimla (pop 170,000). However, this is because a place is expected to have a population of about 100,000 to be declared a 'city', so for example New Delhi is only a town.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In the US it must be Springfield because there's so fucking many of them that they named a TV show after it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

named a TV show after it

The Springfields?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Okay, I spilled my coffee. I'll be giggling all day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Dildo, Newfoundland, Canada: 803 people as of 2021.

Someone here mentioned Vulcan, Alberta - however given the qualifiers of country and size, its 1769 people disqualifies it.

Also, though I am a Trekkie myself and know that Vulcan is well known in those circles, it's virtually unheard of outside them.

Meanwhile, Dildo:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/odd-stories-of-2019-1.5389442

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

Dawson City is also a contender, at least domestically.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Puerto Hurraco. Population 100. Everybody in Spain recognises its name because of a shooting that got burned into the collective mind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

we have a town called "Fucking" with only a few hundred people living there. the town sign gets stolen once a month

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I thought they changed their name? Isn't it called "Fugging" now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

yeah it looks like it, I've searched for "bad fucking" on Google maps and it returned Fugging

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

World recognition or in-country?

If world I'd guess Huskvarna (pop 24 000) for Sweden.

Known for having a company making chainsaws (among other things) named after it (Husqvarna). It is one of the two main brands of professional chainsaws (the other being Stihl).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago

How about Jokkmokk?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Wales has St. Davids - population c.1,750

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

In the UK it's got to be the City of London. Famous for being an ancient city established by the Romans and awash with history, now one of the world's biggest financial centers with a modern skyline of famously distinctive skyscrapers. It's home to some world-famous landmarks like Saint Paul's Cathedral and Tower Bridge, and has a population of about 10,000.

The City of London is not to be confused with London, London, London or London.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

You included London but didn't include London? Shameful.

[–] Davidvanb 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Roswell, NM comes to mind. Tiny and yet most people will think of UFOs when they hear the name.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 2 points 7 hours ago

I was gonna say Albuquerque, because of the name itself, the weird Al song and Breaking Bad, but Roswell is way tinier.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I can't think of a smaller city in the US that fits "so many have heard of it"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Tombstone comes to mind as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Byron bay. Bundaberg. Coon.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Corleone, Sicily, for obvious reasons. Population around 10k.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think a decent number of people know about Dildo, NL

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

Or, like, Saskatoon. Ottawa is smaller than Toronto but it's still big.

[–] joelthelion 5 points 23 hours ago

Gruyères, Switzerland. 2000 inhabitants. Famous for the famous Swiss cheese of the same name.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί