this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
280 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19095 readers
3564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin 9 points 10 hours ago

Well, unless they cave because they are getting death threats from magaferbrainz and threats to their career from the likes of Tommy GROOMERville.

[–] DrSleepless 27 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Russian finally won the cold war

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I just can't get over how easy and cheap it was.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

we did most of the work ourselves tbh

step 1. invent light speed communication and connect all of humanity to each other

step 2. do not under any circumstances regulate it or the people who control it

step 3. lose everything

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Probably could have bought one less nuke at the onset, put the money in a bank for 70 years and been able to pay for everything with that money and still have some ruble left over to destabilize Europe with.

[–] CharlesDarwin 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] Ciderpunk 115 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The national security risk is why she was picked, hope that helps writers at the Atlantic.

[–] AbidanYre 41 points 1 day ago

The national security risk is the one who picked her.

[–] Raiderkev 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've listened to one of her Rogan podcasts. Hillary was absolutely right about her being a Russian puppet. T She parrots so much Russian propaganda it's asinine.

[–] just_another_person 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nope. They can't and won't.

Dumb fucking article asking for reason to the wrong crowd.

[–] dhork 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Senate absolutely can stop her, if they choose to. They probably won't.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Some of them are talking publicly about Gaetz, so they might. Or, Trump might nominate so many other Russian assets that Gabbard looks goid in comparison and sneaks through. Or, recess might be called, allowing Trump to appoint his entire slate of doom with no opposition.

We’ll find out in February.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

i promise im not defending protest or non voters (i need to specify this before im picked apart by a swarm of piranhas) but does no one realize that this massive rift in our social fabric is no longer just a political issue? would defeating trump this year have ended the rise of fascism? the intensifying hatred of minorities, the puritanism, the scapegoating, the violence? kicking the can down the road to 2028 would have accomplished nothing but delaying the inevitable.

if trumps GOP is using the rhetoric they use purely for the purposes of gaining power, had they not gained power in this election they would have just intensified their rhetoric even more and gained power in 2028 instead. these people are literally willing to destroy American society to enrich themselves and their friends.

i voted, you voted, pretty sure everyone on lemmy (worth acknowledging anyway) voted. it was with an empty feeling in my gut though because ballots just determine presidents, they are not a panacea

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

One of the goals of electing Harris was to delay fascism long enough for a populist like Bernie to hijack the Democratic Party and enact a progressive and socialist agenda. It would be a lot easier to run such candidates if Harris was in office than Trump. As it is we are counting on fascist incompetence to give us future elections and enough of a Democratic party left to co-opt.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Thanks regular voters too!

[–] dingdongmetacarples 11 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

Is she the reincarnation of Aaron Burr?