this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
103 points (96.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36107 readers
1177 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am tired of having to listen to all the side theories of every major news outlet and their interpretations of the votes as they come in. Is there anyone better than another to get more solid info and less bullshit?

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11111one11111 72 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not being a dick but how are the election result reporting not unbiased? They're all using the exact same API so the numbers shouldn't deviate as long as they're all in sync. I'm sure as shit not tuning into a network news station so sorry for the ignorance.

[–] snausagesinablanket 64 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the link. This has just what I was looking for, even county level. The only thing I don't know yet is how well it updates, that was an issue in the past between different interfaces and their refreshing. But that was a different internet too.

[–] 11111one11111 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lol why wouldn't they just show both years on this demographic? What's the point of have the api for the live streaming data in the text but not in the graphic? To quote the retired NoSho league MVP Shoarsie, "Sodumb."

Edit: OH FUUUUUUUUUUUCK ^IM ^THE ^ONE ^WHO ^IS ^SODUMB, ^I ^SEE ^IT ^NOW

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can I directly use the API myself?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dohpaz42 4 points 1 month ago

Neat. Thanks!

[–] 11111one11111 1 points 1 month ago

Hate to burst everyone's bubble but the api isn't available without AP credentials.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PBS will have live coverage. Also available streaming.

[–] Johnmannesca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice to point out a public service, as their less likely to act in favor of whatever gets a sponsorship (even though they still do sponsors/ads to a degree)

[–] SmoothLiquidation 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This show was brought to you by viewers like you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Consider the UK's BBC and the guardian. They do it well and the perspective is just a little outside the American bubble. Used them and their live threads the past two elections.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 5 points 1 month ago

I'd recommend video streams from BBC, Sky News and Channel 4 all in the UK. Channel 4 is partnering with CNN for data and shared stories, and their UK election coverage earlier this year was well regarded. TV news in the UK has to be impartial by law so they will not take a side in the election. They will however voice opinions from both sides.

Having said that though all coverage will endlessly speculate all night on what ever result means because that's the nature of elections and filling air time.

Regarding the Guardian, that is not regulated but it is a good quality broadsheet. It is left leaning and effectively supports Harris but it's coverage will still be good quality and not as partisan in the style of US media. But expect it to be biased somehwta in Harris' favour.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Welcome back to the BBC......"

proceed with 7 minutes of on-air staring at the camera in silence as intense looping breaking news music plays. Then the camera just starts drifting around the studio showing the floor, and ceiling. All while the anchorwoman remains still, silent, and emotionally dead inside.

If you don't know what I'm referencing, just watch any youtube video called something like "news fails compilation".

They'll just be 30 minute videos, with 7 minutes being one continuous moment as I've described. It's so hard to watch because it just KEEEEPS ON GOOOOIIIIING!!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You should have seen how bad that kind of stuff was when satellite TV was new. Channels would broadcast straight out into the airwaves and not bother to cut the feed. There's some old fox news clips for example of the guy losing his shit when he kept flubbing his lines. Can't remember his name.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uhhhhhh......are you talking about the Bill O Reiley outburst about Sting? Then he's yelling at the teleprompter guy, because he's an idiot who works in television who doesn't know the phrase "play us out"?

Because that had nothing to do with Fox News......or Satalite broadcasts. Those were supposed to be pretaped bumpers for the closing segment of Entertainment Tonight. But he goes off on a hissy fit, and then starts yelling "THIS THING SUCKS! IT SUCKS!!! PLAY US OUT!!! WHAT DOES THAT MEAN???? FUCK IT!!! WE'LL DO IT LIVE!!! I'LL WRITE IT, YOU SHOOT IT!!! FUCKING THING SUCKS!!!!"

This was the 90s, before Bill O'Reiley was a Fox News talking head.

Unless you're talking about something else. Which could be the case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I conflated the two. You're right. But there were unedited satellite broadcasts with weird shit. I'll see if I can dig up something.

Here's the sort of thing from back in the day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFczpXAGz8Q&t=34

[–] HootinNHollerin 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] hperrin 17 points 1 month ago
[–] cheese_greater 5 points 1 month ago

GroundNews does breakdowns of the range of treatments of the same events being reported on throughout the various major news companies across the political spectrum

[–] rhacer 4 points 1 month ago

You can try The Free Press their coverage starts at 7pm Eastern tomorrow.

https://youtu.be/u3Seqsx7I_A?si=vvLkp6KPhJlzJ3Yr

[–] olafurp 4 points 1 month ago

You can look up some exit polls but they might also not be fully accurate but give a good picture of what'll happen. The only accurate way to get the result is to wait for the electoral committee to cunt the vote, especially in an election this tiiiiiiigtt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'll probably be watching Breaking Points on Youtube. The hosts aren't unbiased, but they don't pretend to not be and provide a good balance overall.

[–] Anticorp 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

For the US, check out 270towin

[–] Intergalactic 2 points 1 month ago

Apple News if you have an iPhone or Apple device. They just show a live activity and that is it.

[–] Johnmannesca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/elections-2024/electoral-calculator?_gl=1148jud3_gabzFZUGVLYU5aajJCdmtESm5lUkpPOWg4VDU1R3c3NUNBNTBqUlJaRkNOTVl6ZmFyQnM3LW52SG53TnBqU1pORQ.._ga_N3H2WMRSFS*MTczMDgyOTU0Ny40LjEuMTczMDgyOTU0Ny4wLjAuMA..

sorry for long link

[–] Anticorp 1 points 1 month ago

It got messed up